Leftist solution to poverty worldwide: Rob from the rich and give to the poor, thus making everyone poor. Leftists may never be able to figure out there is no solution to the problem of poverty.
Irrelevant. There'll be a whole array of disparate belief systems among scientists, from Christianity to atheism and a whole load more as well. What matters in science is the evidence. No theory has come about or become established in science because of personal bias, it's ridiculous to posit anything remotely resembling. If the evidence doesn't hold up to continual testing and stringent review then as before, it's either discarded or modified depending when new data comes to light. If you're really familiar with how a theory is defined in science then you know just how much the evidence has to be to support it.Science does not work in a vacuum. People (i.e., scientists) all have a world view within which they work. An atheist has a difference starting point than a Christian. When we talk about one-time, non-observable events, there is a high degree of bias involved.
If only it actually worked that way.
Of course it did. It's a belief system about the unobservable past.
Again, if only it actually worked that way.
I do.
This conflicts with other statements that you've made about "science".
If the second part of your statement were actually true, the "theory" of a single common ancestor of all life on earth would have been abandoned long ago.
And yet they agree with atheists regarding origins.
"ilk"
Again, we all have the SAME evidence and YET we come to different conclusions.
Your ignorance is monumental.
If this were actually true, the "big bang theory" would have been abandoned long ago.
Science is practiced by humans. Humans have biases and make mistakes.
Blah, blah, blah... origin science is NOT like the kind of science that gives us technology, like computers.
Atheist's have duped folks like you into believing a lie.
No, you start off with a conclusion based on your religious beliefs. Your silly quip about ignorance can just be laughed at and discarded accordingly as you seem to have no idea as to just how stringent testing a posit in science undergoes before it becomes established as a theory. Continually at that. The ToE runs contrary to your beliefs so of course you don't accept it but once again, your beliefs are irrelevant where it comes to how the scientific method actually operates.Again, we all have the SAME evidence and YET we come to different conclusions.
Your ignorance is monumental.
If this were actually true, the "big bang theory" would have been abandoned long ago.
Science is practiced by humans. Humans have biases and make mistakes.
Blah, blah, blah... origin science is NOT like the kind of science that gives us technology, like computers.
Atheist's have duped folks like you into believing a lie.
You never discuss scientific FACTS... you always, without fail, run to fallacy.
Evolution is not a scientific fact no matter how many rubes try to claim it is. It remains a debatable and unproven theory that encompasses hundreds of bad explanations for evidence that contradict the theory.
Do you know what a 'theory' actually is in science?
Of course the rich exploit the poor to make themselves richer. Germans and George Soros did it in WW2. Rich democrats are doing it today. God approves of neither.
No, I observe the world around me just like everyone else.
How do you "test" one-time events that supposedly occurred billions of years before the first possible human observer?
The ToE runs contrary to scientific fact.
Evolution (i.e., the "theory" that all life shares a single common ancestor that magically came to life by natural causes) is a lie and a silly one at that.
It's not "my theory", it's one that's established globally in science. You say you know how the term theory applies where it comes to such. If that's the case then you'll know just how much evidence it requires in order for it to come about. I've no interest in any of the bizarre stuff you want to accuse me of. Alate & Barb are believers and they showed that there's no need for cognitive dissonance in accepting evolution and having faith.No, I observe the world around me just like everyone else.
This "theory" of yours is just the same old tired try to "take the high ground" away from Bible believing Christians.
How do you "test" one-time events that supposedly occurred billions of years before the first possible human observer?
The ToE runs contrary to scientific fact.
Evolution (i.e., the "theory" that all life shares a single common ancestor that magically came to life by natural causes) is a lie and a silly one at that.
By "theory of yours" you should know that I mean "the theory that you agree with". Again, was that really hard to understand.
Just keep making your claims. That is laughably silly.
Evolutionists admit evolution has not been proven but claim it should be accepted as fact because so many people believe it is fact. The problem with that assumption is that there are many pieces of evidence that contradict evolutionary assumptions and conclusions and it is wrong to dismiss that body of evidence in an effort to elevate a debatable theory into acceptance as settled scientific fact.
en.wikipedia.org
If you think that the ToE is "vague" then the ignorance is once again, all yours. I'm not on the "side" of anything but there's no fantasy about it.By "theory of yours" you should know that I mean "the theory that you agree with". Again, was that really hard to understand.
You seem to think that a vague and infinitely adaptable "theory" is a "established globally in science".
Just keep making your claims. That is laughably silly.
Scientific fact establishes that life cannot come from non-life.
Scientific fact also establishes that random accidental changes to not "create" novel features and "improvements".
You are the one on the side of science fantasy.
Of course it's vague.
You do realize that the ToE isn't about the actual origin of life itself, right? It isn't vague in the slightest, not if you're familiar with it and of course there's evidence for it. If there wasn't it wouldn't have become a theory. I thought you said you were familiar as to how theories become formulated in science?Of course it's vague.
There is NO scientific evidence (that is not tortured in the process) that supports it.
Do you really believe that life comes from non-life? (Once again, apart from God's description of His creating it)?
The reason evolution cannot explain the origin of life is that the facts of life contradict evolution assumptions.
No, evolution is a completely separate issue from the origin of life itself.
It isn't, for most people anyway. That's why plenty of believers have no issue with it.