We're still exactly right where They want us.
How can it triumph when the reactionary fascists control the purse strings? At least congratulate yourselves on your partial victory!
Hey, if I can make things more painful for a sourpuss like you, who hates helping others and wants to keep all his money to himself, then I am happy! :cloud9:
I love this description of people, in what used to be the wealthiest country in the world, in need of medical attention who cannot afford it.
very, very compassionate post.
The medical industry is the single largest growing industry in America, now let's set those facts aside for a moment and worry about how people who can't afford to pay them effect the US economy or pockets of the wealthy (when I say wealthy I mean people who can afford the high rising and ridiculous cost of healthcare).
rather than complaining about the poor and their effect on the rich, how about this for a solution, let's make healthcare affordable and reasonably priced and make charging $10-25 in an ER for a tylenol a crime, along with the ridiculous prices for "medications" that treat symptoms instead of diseases like $800 dollars for a month supply or Percocet, that is what is putting an unessary burden on tax payers and the health industry.
I don't agree socialism or Canada's approach to health care is right for the US, but I do beleive we are not doing all we can to stop the gap between price gouging and reasonable care for all.
keep shinin
jerm
You don't know that at all. You are the judgmental type who is dangerous to us all. You believe you have the right to decide what is best for others by force if necessary.
Which may be a good thing...
Who? The NWO?
While you probably make more than me and don't pay any tax yourself. :loser:
I wish other people didn't have your sorry attitude back in the day to make you such a sourpuss that you feel the need to cause pain on other people. :loser:
The FDA is a joke as well, and is bought and paid for by the so called legal drug industry, and the people are lab rats they use for those so called approved drugs by the good ole FDA, side effects :rip: don't let that little matter concern you.jeremysdemo said:I love this description of people, in what used to be the wealthiest country in the world, in need of medical attention who cannot afford it.
very, very compassionate post.
The medical industry is the single largest growing industry in America, now let's set those facts aside for a moment and worry about how people who can't afford to pay them effect the US economy or pockets of the wealthy (when I say wealthy I mean people who can afford the high rising and ridiculous cost of healthcare).
rather than complaining about the poor and their effect on the rich, how about this for a solution, let's make healthcare affordable and reasonably priced and make charging $10-25 in an ER for a Tylenol a crime, along with the ridiculous prices for "medications" that treat symptoms instead of diseases like $800 dollars for a month supply or Percocet, that is what is putting an unnecessary burden on tax payers and the health industry.
I don't agree socialism or Canada's approach to health care is right for the US, but I do beleive we are not doing all we can to stop the gap between price gouging and reasonable care for all.
keep shinin
jerm
A lawyers paradise I might add.
that little matter does concern me, that is why I am a MJ advocate and armature Shaman locally.
I don't understand why you would say such a thing...unless you are not talking to me but speaking to other readers in the thread generally....
I don't agree with the medical industries use of barbiturates and opioid analgesics, but I also cannot sit idly by while they make me and others pay for it out of our taxes and health insurance premiums while they make billions, I figure if we can put a legal cap on the profit it will reduce the availability and use.
I agree with your assessment of the FDA, a very evil and vile agency, approving lethal drugs as medicine while classifying every seed bearing plant and root used for healing as "dietary supplements" (which we pay out of pocket for), Europe does not have this problem, doctors are allowed to give the patients their choice of either type of remedy BOTH covered by insurance.
keep shinin
jerm
I was in agreement with your post Jerm, just added another component to the overall problem, I also agree the natural is a viable option that should be allowed.
Blessings, Zeke.
Don't knock the Toilet Bowl (tm)Gridlock is better than circling the toilet bowl. :comeout:
So you have been implying I have unpaid medical bills. I have something called insurance, which is bad and doesn't pay very much but better than nothing.Again, maybe you haven't seen your credit file for some time.
Not true. My spouse is a nurse and has been to the revenue meetings at the hospital. They lose about 50% of their revenue to people who do not pay. Yes they can get a fraction of it back through the process you describe but it is a pittance and unpaid bills hurt the hospital so they have to jack up their prices to account for it. It's a bad system, Obamacare fixes at least some of that problem.Here is how it works. A man comes into the hospital and gets treated. A bill incurs. When that bill is not payed, it goes to a bill collector. It is then reported to the credit agencies. If that doesn't work, it gets sold, just like a mortgage. And it stays on your report till payed. That means you will have a harder time getting a loan. That is called a writeoff. Even though it isn't. The hospitals holds the note and gets paid till they sell it. The hospitals will make their money on the note. Maybe not as much as if the man just paid it outright, but they still profit.
So, you do believe, ultimately, "let them die" is the order of the day. You can claim this till you're blue in the face. But Reagan already essentially made it a right, albeit a right to an absolute bare minimum of care. The way it's done also makes this type of care very expensive, hence something we need to fix.Healthcare is a good, not a right!
Not true. My spouse is a nurse and has been to the revenue meetings at the hospital. They lose about 50% of their revenue to people who do not pay. Yes they can get a fraction of it back through the process you describe but it is a pittance and unpaid bills hurt the hospital so they have to jack up their prices to account for it. It's a bad system, Obamacare fixes at least some of that problem.
So, you do believe, ultimately, "let them die" is the order of the day. You can claim this till you're blue in the face. But Reagan already essentially made it a right, albeit a right to an absolute bare minimum of care. The way it's done also makes this type of care very expensive, hence something we need to fix.
The way you said it, it's as if hospitals don't lose anything, which is utterly false. The fact that a pittance can be recovered is immaterial to my point, the non-payers still hurt the bottom line of the hospital, a LOT.Okkkkkkkkkkk, first it's untrue, then you admit it is true albeit a pittance. Make up your mind. Also, maybe if the hospitals wouldn't jack up their prices 50% they might not have this issue. Instead of charging $150.00 for a mucous recovery system.
Oh?No I don't believe in "letting them die." Your one sorry excuse for a human being for implying that.
Christians praying a lot more than they have been
toldailytopic: What will 4 more years of Obama mean for this country?
Misery and woe, 10.00 a gallon gas, stoners who rely on the government to support them, food stamps a way of life, and free abortions and obama phones.What will 4 more years of Obama mean for this country?