If you deny that Adam's sin resulted in your condemnation how can you receive justification through Christ's one act of obedience?
And consequently those who bear fruit do so because they were “appointed” to bear fruit and not only that the fruit would arrive but that it would “remain” (John 15:16)Exactly, it doesn't. It makes it relevant to us ALL.
That’s not the kind of choosing John is talking about, is it? Everyone, to one extent or another, is an image bearer of God, that does not mean that they will bear fruit that will remain, does it?Lee said:Actually, God chose us ALL when He came up with the idea of creating us in His image. That some choose to go against God, like Satan and a third of the angels in Heaven does not diminish that God chose each of us and then made it ever so easy to be reconciled to Him, IF we accept the invitation.
“All” is a word that needs to be contextually defined. All does not always mean every single one in the world. When I say I am going to pick up all of the kids from the school for youth group I don’t mean I am picking up every child in the world, nor do I even mean that I am picking up every child in the school, I mean I am picking up every child in the school who is going to youth group at our church that night.Lee said:It is MORE Biblical than changing the meaning of words like ALL and stating that it means ONLY all of the ELECT. Or changing words like whoever to ONLY the ELECT.
As opposed to the predestination of every single person who has ever lived? Yes. But for all your education in Calvinism, you still haven’t correctly articulated the doctrine of election properly.Lee said:Let's see, perhaps "predestination of ONLY the ELECT". Calvinism 101, 201, 301, 401, 501. Every year in every Reformed doctrine college, university, seminary.
That’s a fine assertion but it isn’t biblical. The bible says that the natural man cannot understand spiritual things. They aren’t able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned. (see 1 Cor 2:14)Lee said:If humanity, by choice, rejects God, then humanity, by choice, can accept God.
Of course there are. Here are just a few.Lee said:We are not limited to a one way spiritual street here. There is no Scripture, in context, that confirms Calvin's doctrine of total depravity.
I see you think that Psalms are only quasi-inspired? Not really God’s word? If they aren’t the word of the Lord then whose words are they? Do you believe that the psalms are true Lee. When David says, “For you, O Lord, are good and forgiving, abounding in steadfast love to all who call on you.” Psalm 86:5Lee said:Romans 3:11 is Paul combining OT Scriptures to make a point. Those OT Scriptures are Psalms, not prophecy, and not "thus sayeth the Lord" Scriptures.
I see so heaven is populated by two groups. One group who stand before God clothed sufficiently in their own righteousness and the rest of us who are sinners who are clothed in the righteousness of Christ. Right?Lee said:Whether you, Calvin, Augustine, or Plato (from whom Augustine actually got determinism philosophy), like it or not, the Bible is full of righteous humans in the presence of God, before Jesus came to earth as a human. In fact, Jesus did not come to save the righteous. He came to save sinners.
for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, (Romans 3:23-24 ESV) |
Right, the invention of Wesley’s mind that keeps Wesley from being a heretic. Where in scripture can we see this Lee?Lee said:Ah, now we come to what Wesley calls "prevenient grace".
Really because I am pretty sure that millions of people lived and died never having even heard of Jesus or the foot of the cross, so you prove to me how God has drawn ALL humans to the foot of the cross. Scripture please. Tell me please what verse proves that the Native American man who died twenty two minutes after Jesus died was somehow drawn, by the Holy Spirit, to the foot of the cross.Lee said:God, through Holy Spirit, draws ALL humanity to the foot of the cross.
Here is where your consistency is about to fall apart. Why would someone who can choose Christ entirely without the aid of the Holy Spirit need the Holy Spirit after they come to Christ (on their own) in order to live the rest of their lives? Isn’t someone who is spiritually alive enough to come to Christ without the Holy Spirit spiritually alive enough to live a life pleasing to God without the Spirit’s aid?Lee said:He did all the work, and does all the work in our lives through the power of His Holy Spirit.
Which is it, greater or lesser.Lee said:We merely cooperate to a greater or lesser extent, which shows in our lives.
Clearly you don’t’ believe in eternal security.Lee said:We are either growing more holy, become stagnant, or fall away from His grace.
1 Cor 2:14.Lee said:Show me the Scripture where it says you are the owner of depravity, or total depravity.
So that’s what you are, Eastern Orthodox?Lee said:Yes, you did not realize that Augustine of Hippo was a student of Plato and derived his determinism philosophy from Plato and injected it into Christianity where before the 4th century it did not exist, and to this day does not exist in the Eastern Orthodox Church.
Two thoughts. First, whether or not God is able to present the salvation message to ALL is conditioned by the reality that God has not presented his salvation message to all. Millions have died never hearing the gospel and there are STILL people who haven’t heard the gospel.Lee said:Yes, it would, but you Calvinists limit God's ability by saying that not only Ephesians 1, but John 3 does not apply to everyone on earth. Even though, Scripture is quite clear about God's ability to present His salvation message to ALL.
Not really, God predestined them before the foundations of the world. You tell me, which happened first, God’s predestination or their being faithful?Lee said:Please note what Paul actually wrote: "To the saints who are in Ephesus, and are faithful in Christ Jesus:" That "and are faithful" is key.
Calvinists don’t deny that people choose, we deny that people have the power to do so apart from the regeneration of the Holy Spirit.Lee said:It is a choice to remain faithful.
Scripture please. I’d like the reference that backs up this assertion.Lee said:God's predestination was culminated in Adam and Eve.
I think God is big enough to be the One who does the choosing.Lee said:You think too small of God.
Lets take that assumption and square it against scripture.Lee said:He predestined ALL humanity.
And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified. (Romans 8:30 ESV) |
I see, so all things being united in Him means that all, Satan, the fallen angels, all unbelievers, God haters and idolaters will be united in Him, right?Lee said:Let's look beyond your Reformed proof text to verses 9 and 10: "making known to us the mystery of his will, according to his purpose, which he set forth in Christ as a plan for the fullness of time, to unite all things in him, things in heaven and things on earth."
Once again, Calvinists ignore that which does not conform to their doctrine, or change the meaning of words and phrases that do not agree and make them agree. What part of ALL things in him (both) things in Heaven and things on earth is God not capable of uniting in His will?
Sure, let’s just look at the “all’s” and “any’s” in context.Lee said:Here is a hint: those things that possess God given free will, which is used to go against His will. Otherwise, Peter would not have needed to say this: "The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance. But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies will be burned up and dissolved, and the earth and the works that are done on it will be exposed."
Now, please explain the accepted Calvinist, Augustinian, Platonic meaning of " any" and "all" in Peter's 2nd letter to Christians.
Maybe you should learn to read and comprehend the meanings of words.\
Wrong again.
Acts 17:28.
Maybe you should learn to read and comprehend the meanings of words.
FAILTranslation: "I am too lazy and unqualified to present decent answer to this comprehensive post by Dialogos."
FAIL
Dialogos didn't post anything comprehensive, for one. For two he was responding to a post I made about a year or so ago, I think. And third, he was wrong, as my post is in plain English and is held to be true by all but hardcore Calvinists. Dialogos doesn't understand the meaning of the word "directly." And fourth, the verse he posted doesn't contradict my statement in the least.
:ha:Is this your excuse(s)?
:crackup:
Dialogos runs exegetical circles around you . . .
And consequently those who bear fruit do so because they were “appointed” to bear fruit and not only that the fruit would arrive but that it would “remain” (John 15:16)
So the question is who does God choose and when does He choose them?
That’s not the kind of choosing John is talking about, is it? Everyone, to one extent or another, is an image bearer of God, that does not mean that they will bear fruit that will remain, does it?
John is talking about the kind of choosing where God chooses us to bear fruit that will remain. Let’s keep focused on what we mean when we say “God chooses.” God chooses all sorts of people for all sorts of things in all sorts of ways, but in John 15 Jesus is talking about choosing his disciples to abide in Him.
“All” is a word that needs to be contextually defined. All does not always mean every single one in the world. When I say I am going to pick up all of the kids from the school for youth group I don’t mean I am picking up every child in the world, nor do I even mean that I am picking up every child in the school, I mean I am picking up every child in the school who is going to youth group at our church that night.
That’s not changing the meaning of a word, it’s just moving from defining a word in general to allowing a word to be defined in context. Arminians refuse to let “all” be defined in contextually and we will see that in your example from 2 Peter.
As opposed to the predestination of every single person who has ever lived? Yes. But for all your education in Calvinism, you still haven’t correctly articulated the doctrine of election properly.
That’s a fine assertion but it isn’t biblical. The bible says that the natural man cannot understand spiritual things. They aren’t able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned. (see 1 Cor 2:14)
A spiritually neutral human (can you say Pelagius) might have been able to choose God, but a spiritually dead human cannot and does not apart from the intervention of God by His Spirit.
Of course there are. Here are just a few.
Ephesians 2:1-3, John 6:44, Romans 3:1-23 and 2 Cor 4:3-4.
I see you think that Psalms are only quasi-inspired? Not really God’s word? If they aren’t the word of the Lord then whose words are they? Do you believe that the psalms are true Lee. When David says, “For you, O Lord, are good and forgiving, abounding in steadfast love to all who call on you.” Psalm 86:5
Do you think that this is somehow less true because it’s a song lyric?
Furthermore, what is the point Paul is trying to make from stringing those OT scripture together?
I think it is pretty clear, Paul is saying that all have sinned, they do not fear God and do not seek God.
So you tell me. How does the fact that they are song lyrics negate the content and meaning of those verses? How do you get from those verses that men do fear God on their own and they do seek God on their own.
I see so heaven is populated by two groups. One group who stand before God clothed sufficiently in their own righteousness and the rest of us who are sinners who are clothed in the righteousness of Christ. Right?
Wrong.
for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, (Romans 3:23-24 ESV)
Right, the invention of Wesley’s mind that keeps Wesley from being a heretic. Where in scripture can we see this Lee?
Really because I am pretty sure that millions of people lived and died never having even heard of Jesus or the foot of the cross, so you prove to me how God has drawn ALL humans to the foot of the cross. Scripture please. Tell me please what verse proves that the Native American man who died twenty two minutes after Jesus died was somehow drawn, by the Holy Spirit, to the foot of the cross.
Here is where your consistency is about to fall apart. Why would someone who can choose Christ entirely without the aid of the Holy Spirit need the Holy Spirit after they come to Christ (on their own) in order to live the rest of their lives? Isn’t someone who is spiritually alive enough to come to Christ without the Holy Spirit spiritually alive enough to live a life pleasing to God without the Spirit’s aid?
Which is it, greater or lesser.
Clearly you don’t’ believe in eternal security.
1 Cor 2:14.
So that’s what you are, Eastern Orthodox?
I realize Augustine was familiar with platonic thought. I’m not a monergist because of Autustine, I’m a monergist because of scripture.
Two thoughts. First, whether or not God is able to present the salvation message to ALL is conditioned by the reality that God has not presented his salvation message to all. Millions have died never hearing the gospel and there are STILL people who haven’t heard the gospel.
Second, there is’t a Calvinist I know who has ever denied that whosoever believes in Him will never perish so I’m afraid your comments here don’t hit their mark.
Now, regarding predestination you said:
Not really, God predestined them before the foundations of the world. You tell me, which happened first, God’s predestination or their being faithful?
Calvinists don’t deny that people choose, we deny that people have the power to do so apart from the regeneration of the Holy Spirit.
Scripture please. I’d like the reference that backs up this assertion.
I think God is big enough to be the One who does the choosing.
Lets take that assumption and square it against scripture.
And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified. (Romans 8:30 ESV)
Do you think that God justified and glorified all of humanity?
I see, so all things being united in Him means that all, Satan, the fallen angels, all unbelievers, God haters and idolaters will be united in Him, right?
No?
I think you need to rethink the way you are interpreting that passage friend.
God united all things in Him. All who are in Him are united together, but not all are in Him. And the scripture is clear that we can’t find ourselves in Him without faith in Him and the scriptures are also abundantly clear that we, being dead in our trespasses and sins, cannot have faith without the rescuing regeneration of the Holy Spirit. For if the Holy Spirit does not open our blind eyes, we all would have continued to maintain the message of the cross was foolishness.
Sure, let’s just look at the “all’s” and “any’s” in context.
The answer is in the text you quoted, you just don’t see it because your eyes are too conditioned by your traditions. The Lord is not slow in fulfilling his promises but is patent toward who?
Who?
patient toward you…
Who is the “you” in 2 Peter 3:9?
Is Peter writing to all of mankind?
No, he is writing to the beloved (verse 8). Arminians badly abuse this passage by ignoring the context of the audience. Peter isn’t writing to all of humanity, he is writing to God’s beloved. God’s patience is displayed toward his beloved, the elect, (the “you” of verse 9).
But let me ask you this if that answer isn’t satisfactory to you.
If you think that God’s patience described in 2 Peter 3 is set toward all of humanity and that God is not willing that any human being perish, then why do some perish?
Why won’t God just wait long enough for every human to repent? Peter said that purpose of God’s patience was to bring repentance, right? Why then would God ever allow anyone’s life to end before they believed? Why would God ever let His son return to a world populated by unbelievers? All of these will perish, will they not? Your use of the verse is actually self-defeating. You say God’s patience towards the objects of his patience is insufficient. God just didn’t wait long enough for all of humanity to repent. In contrast to the actual verse, you think God is absolutely willing to let the “any” perish.
It seems to me the one who needs to look at the definitions of the “all”s and “any”s in that passage, is you. Because, as it stands, you don’t really believe that God is patient toward “all” (as you define it) because there are some who will find the end of God’s patience and will die in their sins, and you don’t really believe that God isn’t willing that “any” (as you define it) should perish because you know that many will.
I don’t, I see that God is referring to the beloved (verse 8), the elect, and God is patient toward ALL the elect, He will not end their lives or the world before every single one of them lives in repentance and I am quite certain He is not willing that any of his beloved perish.
Looking forward to your response.
God’s blessings be with you.
Dialogos
One can predestine without individually choosing who will be included in the final result.
For example:
The serpent on the pole was lifted up to heal those bitten by serpents.
(Numbers 21:8-9)
It was predestined that whosoever looked upon it would be healed, but it was not predestined which individuals would do so.
:thumb:One can predestine without individually choosing who will be included in the final result.
For example:
The serpent on the pole was lifted up to heal those bitten by serpents.
(Numbers 21:8-9)
It was predestined that whosoever looked upon it would be healed, but it was not predestined which individuals would do so.
One can predestine without individually choosing who will be included in the final result.
For example:
The serpent on the pole was lifted up to heal those bitten by serpents.
(Numbers 21:8-9)
It was predestined that whosoever looked upon it would be healed, but it was not predestined which individuals would do so.
And consequently those who bear fruit do so because they were “appointed” to bear fruit and not only that the fruit would arrive but that it would “remain” (John 15:16)
So the question is who does God choose and when does He choose them?
That’s not the kind of choosing John is talking about, is it? Everyone, to one extent or another, is an image bearer of God, that does not mean that they will bear fruit that will remain, does it?
John is talking about the kind of choosing where God chooses us to bear fruit that will remain. Let’s keep focused on what we mean when we say “God chooses.” God chooses all sorts of people for all sorts of things in all sorts of ways, but in John 15 Jesus is talking about choosing his disciples to abide in Him.
“All” is a word that needs to be contextually defined. All does not always mean every single one in the world. When I say I am going to pick up all of the kids from the school for youth group I don’t mean I am picking up every child in the world, nor do I even mean that I am picking up every child in the school, I mean I am picking up every child in the school who is going to youth group at our church that night.
That’s not changing the meaning of a word, it’s just moving from defining a word in general to allowing a word to be defined in context. Arminians refuse to let “all” be defined in contextually and we will see that in your example from 2 Peter.
As opposed to the predestination of every single person who has ever lived? Yes. But for all your education in Calvinism, you still haven’t correctly articulated the doctrine of election properly.
As opposed to the predestination of every single person who has ever lived? Yes. But for all your education in Calvinism, you still haven’t correctly articulated the doctrine of election properly.
Originally Posted by Lee
If humanity, by choice, rejects God, then humanity, by choice, can accept God.
That’s a fine assertion but it isn’t biblical. The bible says that the natural man cannot understand spiritual things. They aren’t able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned. (see 1 Cor 2:14)
A spiritually neutral human (can you say Pelagius) might have been able to choose God, but a spiritually dead human cannot and does not apart from the intervention of God by His Spirit.