Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
During our conversation, the pedophiles and pederasts of the LGBTQ movement were mentioned. Most if not all either were involved with child rape or supported it. I noted that you didn't chastise your "leaders" for that. Here's your opportunity.
I have no 'leaders' that I would follow that are involved in child rape or support it.
But you are making a mistake of inclusion by assuming there is some homogenous group that includes all LGBT, pedophiles, and pederasts and any other group that you want to toss in. There certainly isn't one that all represent the same view. There are no 'leaders' that all LGBT people 'follow'.
If you want to identify with a movement that has amongst other things made homosexuality legal and opened up/took control of invaluable institutions (government, marriage, the family, youth mentor groups, entertainment/media, Education, the Church, the military, mental health, etc.) to those with homosexual desires and gender confusion then you better acknowledge the men and women that fought hard (assaulted harassed, etc. etc.) for those so-called "rights. As mentioned most if not all were either pedophiles/pederasts or supported adult child rape.
If there were I would certainly chastise them and support their arrest. I, after all, came to this debate to defend children from harmful treatments.
Here's your chance. "Pride parades" will be going on all over the US (and most of the world) this summer. At these parades all kinds of moral depravity will be done in front of children (children like "Desmond is amazing" are also used to entertain the perverts who attend these parades) BTW Kit, if you want to have these degenerates arrested, I doubt that you'll get cooperation from the Governors, Mayors, Police Chiefs and Police Officers attending:
We can talk about the indoctrination of children by the LGBTQ movement in schools and every aspect of society later.
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
When we started our debate in another forum, you stated that you have two sons and that one has same sex desires. You later mentioned that you were bisexual (the "B" in the LGBT acronym), but never mentioned that they were just homosexual desires.
Since I find my wife desirable, enough to have two children, the flaw in your statement is obvious.
Yet you have stated that you have homosexual desires, i.e. find other males sexually attractive. One would think that if you're just dealing with being sexually attracted to other males, that you wouldn't embrace the child molesting/indoctrinating LGBTQ movement. I find women attractive, but as my pastor says when he sees a beautiful woman: "Nice job God, and then I move onto other things".
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
You are aware that "swinging" is not only acceptable in the movement that you defend, but encouraged. LGBTQ icon Dan Savage and his 'husband' do it. Surely you're not calling Savage and what'shisname perverts are you Kit?
"Swining" is fairly acceptable in heterosexuals as well.
I noted that you didn't condemn someone cheating on their spouse, even if it was consensual. Christians call those people perverts who need God's Word in their lives, LGBTQ'ers call them "allies".
I don't know how much it is encouraged anymore, I suspect a check of numbers will find it in decline and I favor social tools and pressures that discourage it such as allowing same-sex marriage.
I talked about the Ashley Madison website in an earlier thread. To my knowledge it's still as popular as ever. Regarding homosexual promiscuity, I can pull up article after article in homosexual periodicals that will never condemn such. Remember this Kit:
The thief doesn't condemn the burglar, as the burglar doesn't condemn the robber, i.e. one proud and unrepentant sinner doesn't condemn another.
Catholic Randy Engel explained it in an interview for her book "The Rites of Sodomy":
[The Homosexual Collective] " I am simply referring to the organized “Gay Liberation Movement” as opposed to the individual homosexual. There is a symbiotic relationship between the Collective and the individual — each feeds off the other. The latter looks to the Collective to affirm his identity as a “gay” man and for support to sustain his habituated vice. The Collective, on the other hand, derives its power, prestige and income from the individual homosexual.
Defections from its ranks are frowned upon and seen as a threat."
http://www.newengelpublishing.com/pages/CFN-Interview-on-Rite-of-Sodomy.html
I really don't care about Don Savage and his husband, if they chose to have an open marriage that is their issue, take it up with them.
i.e. "Do your own thing".
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I marvel how you borrow off of biblical principles (monogamy) yet defend a behavior and lifestyle that God abhors.
I think you will find that monogamy is not 'owned' by Judeo-Christian faiths exclusively.
Other major religions in the world embrace it as well. What a coincidence, those same religions condemn homosexuality!
And I've said before that I feel that multi-partner sexual lifestyles are not beneficial to the individuals that practice them or society as a whole. It is perfectly logical to use the same social tools that society has developed to discourage such behavior, namely monogamy, and marriage, wherever you borrow it from.
Since you brought up what's not beneficial to individuals and society, how about we talk about how harmful homosexuality is to individuals and to society as a whole? (After all, you are in thread that has given a vast number of reasons "Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized!".
12 Ways Adult Homosexuals Endanger Children
https://barbwire.com/2014/06/04/twelve-ways-homosexual-adults-endanger-children/
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I invited you to TOL because I want to help you, not subject you to the hate that the LGBTQ movement consists of.
Perhaps you can find a good therapist through this Christian therapy organization and after you've understood why you have homosexual desires, you can say
"Hi, thanks to spiritual and psychological therapy, I'm an EX bisexual."
https://www.aacc.net/
I bet that they even help atheists Kit
Thank you for your concern. I'm good though.
I didn't post the site so much for you as I did parents out there that want to seek a legitimate therapist for their sexually/gender confused child.
Oh and Kit: a male who finds another male sexually attractive is far from being "good".