Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Looking back at the posts from the website where we first started chatting, I'm getting the feeling that the person who wrote this expose' on anal sex does a little bit more than just think about having sex with other men.
One does not need a medical degree to do research on a specific aspect of biology. It is called the Information Age for a reason. They are called books, you should try them sometime but then you are a person who is afraid to publish his life's passion.
One must have a perverse interest in the anus in order to do research which results in the conclusion that
"
Eliminating some nerves and moving a few key components a few inches to the right or left would render pleasure from the act impossible. A few more nerves in the right places would render it intensely painful."
A normal person rarely thinks about the anus, other than the fact that it's a muscle designed to expel human waste.
The question occurred to me so I did a little research and found that yes that particular sex act is only possible due to very specific features of mammal biology. From an evolutionary viewpoint that is understandable but if you believe in an intelligent designer then you have to accept that it was designed that way.
You avoided the question of course by resorting to the free will argument that really doesn't answer it.
I get creeped out pretty easy when males start talking about how pleasurable anal sex can be, hence I quickly change the subject so that I don't have to run to a nearby toilet to vomit.
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Speaking of children molestation/indoctrination and anal sex,
how about we discuss Linda Harvey's 2nd point on
12 Ways Homosexual Adults Endanger Children
2. Children living a home headed by homosexual adults are exposed to the same poor examples in triple intensity and intimacy. Same -sex- coupled parents live a huge lie, deceiving themselves and the children, because they were not “born this way,” this is not “marriage,” and they are in all probability engaging in physically risky behaviors, like males who have anal sex . Just talk to emergency room doctors to find out the harmful outcomes of “faux” intercourse. These relationships can turn volatile in a second, with higher rates of domestic violence, putting everyone in the household at risk. Homosexual adults are typically high consumers of pornography, another element poisonous to the young.
Children from such homes have more problematic lives as young adults, according to a study by Dr. Mark Regnerus, findings spurned by vocal homosexual activists in America. Still, the study was academically validated by the University of Texas.
https://barbwire.com/2014/06/04/twelve-ways-homosexual-adults-endanger-children/
Go ahead and refute deny deny deny the above, that's pretty much the modus operandi of the LGBTQ movement.
It is again relying too much on stereotypes.
As I showed you in the first point that Linda Harvey made in the article: the key is that these people are proud and unrepentant about their behavior, i.e. they're not struggling with same sex desires and are attempting to overcome them. As you saw in my most recent scenario with Arthur Brain, never will they (or their allies) tell children that homosexuality is morally wrong and that it's an extremely harmful behavior, as well as being psychologically and spiritually damaging.
Remember how you stated that as long as the parent[s) of 10 year old boy are ok with it then he should be allowed to dress up like a girl and dance provocatively at parades where all kinds of sexual depravity takes place? Remember how you also stated that the parents of children who are sexually and gender confused shouldn't be allowed to seek psychological/spiritual help from a trained and licensed therapist so that their sexually/gender confused child won't have to go through the living hell that homosexuality is?
The prosecution rests it's case.
You might be shocked to find out that not all gay couples engage in anal sex. A survey done a few years ago found it was somewhere close to half do not. I'll see if I can find it again to get the exact figures.
I told the late alwight the atheist (who admitted that he had anal cancer, and disappeared shortly thereafter) that "the anus is to a homosexual relationship what the vagina is to a heterosexual relationship".
When the anus is used as a sex object, very very bad things happen (especially when men are at the receiving end). Of course you and I and the rest of the world wouldn't be here if our parents didn't engage in traditional sex.
Regarding those male homosexuals who don't engage in buggery: paraphrasing the words of my good friend Sandy (aka Rusha): "...then they're not 'real' homosexuals".
There are also well-adjusted intelligent homosexuals, usually the type to marry and form a household, that will be no different than good heterosexual parents in restricting sex to the bedroom and seeing that their kids receive a good upbringing and education on sexual matters.
They engage in a perversion that is extremely harmful and identify with a movement that amongst other things indoctrinates innocent children and hijacks society's invaluable institutions and severely damages them or outright destroys them.
Other studies have found that the outcomes of children raised in same-sex households are not statistically different than children raised in opposite-sex households. Those studies were a key part of the evidence in the court cases leading up to Obergefell v Hodges.
I understand that you seem incapable of believing there are well-adjusted homosexuals out there who can make good parents or teachers but that does not alter the fact that there are.
Mark Regenerus found otherwise, but then when the LGBTQ movement complained about his findings, it became a unscientific study.
UT investigates professor's study on children with gay parents
Updated July 11, 2012
Allegations of scientific misconduct have prompted the University of Texas to investigate a professor's study that found adults with gay parents reported significantly different life experiences than the children of married, heterosexual biological parents.
The study, authored by associate professor of sociology Mark Regnerus, made a splash when it was published last month in the journal Social Science Research. It has since drawn criticism from scholars at UT and elsewhere.
Bucking the consensus of the past decade of scholarship that the sexual orientation of parents does not negatively affect children in consequential ways Regnerus found that adults with gay parents tended to report lower levels of success in economic and romantic pursuits and struggled more with mental health issues.
T
he university began the inquiry after New York City freelance writer Scott Rosensweig, who uses the byline Scott Rose and writes about lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender issues for a blog called "The New Civil Rights Movement," sent a letter of complaint to UT President Bill Powers on June 21.
In his letter, Rosensweig alleged that Regnerus had committed scientific misconduct because he had created "a study designed so as to be guaranteed to make gay people look bad, through means plainly fraudulent and defamatory." Rosensweig also pointed out that the study was funded by the conservative Witherspoon Institute and the Bradley Foundation, writing that Regnerus had taken "money from an anti-gay political organization for his study."
Regnerus declined to comment on the inquiry but said that his study followed the standard protocol of scholarly research.
"A team consisting of leading family researchers was involved in developing the research protocol," Regnerus wrote in an email. "This academic team merged scholars across disciplines and ideological lines in a spirit of civility and reasoned inquiry, and the protocol developed by this team was subsequently approved by the University of Texas' Institutional Review Board."
"Normal procedures were followed for obtaining outside support, as many researchers do," he wrote.
The University of Texas defines scientific misconduct as "fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism" and "practices that seriously deviate from ethical standards."
Read more:
https://www.statesman.com/news/loca...dren-with-gay-parents/xb1G2oDRr8CH7IEEfXLwFP/
It doesn't take a study to show that faux parents who subject their adopted children to immoral ideology and the child molesting LGBTQ movement's lifestyle, are going to turn out as messed up as "daddy and daddy".
Speaking of what causes homosexual desires and that they can be changed: When (and if) Arthur Brain returns, I want to share an article by the NYT's where Robert Spitzer and Irving Bieber debated.
lain: