lovemeorhateme
Well-known member
Welcome back Pete. How goes things?
:wave2:
Things are pretty good thanks, life is okay. I'm somehow managing to maintain my sanity at university. Yourself?
Welcome back Pete. How goes things?
Eh, knock yourself out...
Well it's one thing he has that you don't, so even when he comes out with outlandish stuff he's not so narcissistic as to be unable to laugh at himself. I've seen him for years on TV and he's cracked me up several times.
You on the other hand are just inadvertently funny. 'King Kong ain't got nothing on you'? I doubt he'd want to have Connie. It's just that kind of loony self impressed 'machismo' that's as sad as it is amusing, the same as with the 'guy thing' crap. I like plenty of gritty hard hitting films. So do plenty of my friends, men and women alike. Go figure, or don't...
Never watched it. Telling how you're so aware of these shows though aCW. It kinda fits in with all of these bonkers fantasies you have about straight guys being gay...
:wave2:
Things are pretty good thanks, life is okay. I'm somehow managing to maintain my sanity at university. Yourself?
Welcome (finally) to the WHMBR! Part 4 thread UN. (After 4 invitations in another thread, UN finally mustered up the courage).
I must say, opening with LGBTQueer propaganda is a good start to show how proudly you fly your rainbow colors.
If you should get the courage to return to the thread (surely you're not one of those trolls that post a LGBTQ propaganda video and don't return to defend it?)
I don't believe any of them believe (except for Uganda, which Pastor Scott Lively has visited on numerous occasions) in Jesus's 2nd Greatest Commandment. How can I love my neighbor as I'd love myself if I allow individuals who partake in homosex to destroy themselves and those who back the LGBTQ agenda to destroy our once great nation which was founded on biblical principles?
Nah, one thread is more than enough when it comes to your drama queen antics.
Gritty in your world are movies like "The Dresser".
(Refer to the table of contents regarding out and proud actor Ian McKellan, a real queen if there ever was one).
What, you don't partake in 'gay' culture Art? (Homophobe).
(Refer to the table of contents regarding out and proud actor Ian McKellan, a real queen if there ever was one).
Glad to hear it. We all have our ups and downs, even when we're followers of Christ.
Aside from dealing with a certain drama queen on a daily basis, life is good.
has a date been set for Lively's trial for crimes against humanity yet?
don't be silly aCW, Ian McKellen can't be gay he's almost 40 years older than the gay Life expectancy you keep going on about
Sir Ian McKellen: Paedophile vetting laws will stop theatres using child actors
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ng-laws-stop-theatres-using-child-actors.html
And some people are pedophiles who don't like laws protecting child actors in theaters.
Whenas thou art a religious extremist, thou hast the rite of slander. :rapture:Ummm...
Because you're a lesbian pedophile?
If I've said it once, I've said it a million times:
Peds like McKellen don't get AIDS from raping 10 year old boys.
Sir Ian McKellen: Paedophile vetting laws will stop theatres using child actors
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ng-laws-stop-theatres-using-child-actors.html
And some people are pedophiles who don't like laws protecting child actors in theaters.
You and Naz should get a room together aCW.
There! Fixed that for ya!
There was no real Dogtanian Naz it is a cartoon character. :doh:Apparently the REAL Dogtanian wasn't a Fag Enabler:
You and Naz should get a room together aCW.
You could make up and compile all the wordy misinformation while Naz could handle all the graphical misrepresentations.
Before checking your links aCW, iirc you were incandescent with rage that children be restricted from performing as amateurs on stage unless a paedophile check was imposed and paid for. The fact that paedophilia is not an issue in amateur dramatics as it is and that the cost would certainly stop some kids from taking part wasn't as important to you as that a much respected gay actor was opposing it. lain:I must say that Naz is handy with a computer. That being said: I'd ask you to defend Lady Ian McKellen's words about not doing background checks to keep pedophiles out of the theater, but you've already been there, done that in an earlier thread.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4357502&postcount=8649
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4358092&highlight=Ian+McKellen#post4358092
Before checking your links aCW, iirc you were incandescent with rage that children be restricted from performing as amateurs on stage unless a paedophile check was imposed and paid for. The fact that paedophilia is not an issue in amateur dramatics as it is and that the cost would certainly stop some kids from taking part wasn't as important to you as that a much respected gay actor was opposing it. lain:
Am I convinced that you actually give a fig for the welfare of aspiring young thespians? :think:As I mentioned in one of those links: pedophilia/pederasty is a huge problem in all institutions and organizations (the Church, youth mentor groups, etc.). If Lady Ian McKellen (who is a proud and unrepentant homosexual and marches in parades where children are exposed to all kinds of moral depravity) is trying to convince me and the rest of society that somehow the amateur theater in the UK is exempt from those problems, then I'll have to take a pass on the Kool-Aid that he's handing out.