Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
So you were against homosexuality when it was illegal?
But in an earlier post you said this:
So evidently if a behavior is illegal (which homosexuality was for the vast majority of US history and throughout the history of the human race) that doesn't influence your view on whether something is morally right or wrong, as long as consent is given by...
who again needs to give consent for people to engage in immoral acts that are not only extremely harmful to the individuals who engage in them, but to their loved ones, their community and society at large?
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
BTW, adultery is legal. Why again are you against it?
So adultery should be looked at on a case by case basis (if the spouse gave consent, then it's morally acceptable?).
So you were against homosexuality when it was illegal?
No ... there was no good reason for homosexuality to be illegal.
But in an earlier post you said this:
Uh huh. As though you need an opening to do so. Anyways, consent has always been the criteria used when ADULTS choose to participate in unhealthy, legal acts.
So evidently if a behavior is illegal (which homosexuality was for the vast majority of US history and throughout the history of the human race) that doesn't influence your view on whether something is morally right or wrong, as long as consent is given by...
who again needs to give consent for people to engage in immoral acts that are not only extremely harmful to the individuals who engage in them, but to their loved ones, their community and society at large?
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
BTW, adultery is legal. Why again are you against it?
In most instances, it takes away the CONSENT of another person ... you know, the victim/spouse/partner who is being cheated on.
So adultery should be looked at on a case by case basis (if the spouse gave consent, then it's morally acceptable?).