Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Are you ok Art? I mean you took a pass on showing your HATRED of God and people who believe in His Word, and then chose not to talk about the best thing to happen to the LGBTQueer movement since the AIDS cocktail (shaken not stirred), LGBTQueer/NAMBLA activist Rex Tillerson.
I guess I should add your latest obsession to the long list of them (my former pastor Ken Hutcherson being a LGBTQ activist, Phil Robertson being for child molestation, etc. etc.).
Regarding what I voted for in the last Presidential election:
No civil government may legitimately authorize or define marriage or family relations, as affirmed by the 10th amendment, delegating to the people, - as our Founders understood the family – as necessary to the general welfare.
We affirm the importance of Biblical scripture in the founders’ intent as eloquently stated by Noah Webster:
“The moral principles and precepts contained in the Scriptures ought to form the basis of all our civil constitution and laws… All the miseries and evils which men suffer from vice, crime, ambition, injustice, oppression, slavery, and war proceed from their despising or neglecting the precepts in the Bible.”
The law of our Creator defines marriage as the union between one man and one woman. The marriage covenant is the foundation of the family and the family is fundamental in the maintenance of a stable, healthy
and prosperous social order. No government may legitimately authorize or define marriage or family relations contrary to what God has instituted. We are opposed to any judicial ruling or amending the U.S. Constitution or any state constitution re-defining marriage with any definition other than the Biblical standard.
We call for an end to all taxation and economic formulas that discourage marriage, incentivize cohabitation and child bearing outside of marriage or authorize or provide government funding for policies and programs that further erode the jurisdiction of the family or parental rights.
We reject the notion that homosexuals, transgenders or those who are sexually deviant are deserving of legal favor or special protection, and affirm the rights of states and localities to proscribe offensive sexual behavior. We oppose all efforts to impose a new sexual legal order through any courts or legislatures. We stand against so-called "sexual orientation" and "hate crime" statutes that attempt to legitimize inappropriate sexual behavior or stifle public opposition to its expression. We oppose government funding of "partner" benefits for unmarried individuals. Finally, we oppose any legal recognition of We recognize that parents have the fundamental right and responsibility to nurture, educate, and discipline their children. We oppose the assumption of any of these responsibilities by any governmental agency without the express delegation of the parents or legal due process. We affirm the value of the father and the mother in the home and we oppose efforts to legalize adoption of children by homosexual singles or couples. homosexual or civil unions.
https://www.constitutionparty.com/assets/2016-2010_National_Platform.pdf
Needless to say, the Constitution Party aint your cup of tea Art.
Thanks for stopping by.
Oh, I'm just not falling for your deflective little rabbit trails aCW. Your candidate doesn't support the re-criminalization of homosexuality, in fact he doesn't seem to think the state should interfere in such at all:
"While being completely opposed to it morally, Castle explicitly indicated that same-sex marriage is among the consensual activities in which he believes the government should not be involved."
So why did you support - by your own definition - a LGBTQ activist?