God's Truth
New member
Yes of course I have an imagination, we all do but I don't let my imagination rule my reasoning like you do.
You prove you let your imagination rule your beliefs.
Yes of course I have an imagination, we all do but I don't let my imagination rule my reasoning like you do.
Watchmanonthewall,
You said that there was no broken broken parts, but the shroud you are promoting says that there was.
Could you respond to this contradiction in your beliefs?
The Shroud of Turin
http://theshroudofturin.blogspot.com/2015/11/were-struck-in-face-6-bible-and-shroud.html
"Jesus was struck at the head and spat upon (Matt. 26:68, 27:30; Mark 14:65, 15:19; Luke 22:63-64; John 18:22, 19:3). The image on the Shroud shows a bruised face, a broken nose and a swollen right eye that is almost closed." (Guerrera, V., 2001, "The Shroud of Turin: A Case for Authenticity," TAN: Rockford IL, p.38. Italics original)
You prove you let your imagination rule your beliefs.
You have obviously run out of things to argue your POV and are just copying what I am saying. That is a classic sign of low intelligence.
Watchman,
Why didn't you reply to this post?
Did Jesus have a broken nose or not?
Then how are we saved by His death please? It isn't derailing, but relevantYou seem to contradict yourself? As per is bolded parts.
Christ's was the fulfilment of the sacrificial law, without His death we would not have been saved.
You expose everything that your are when you falsely judge me.
Then how are we saved by His death please? It isn't derailing, but relevant
Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk
That is a source that you have found and has nothing to do with what is in the documentary. You are easily distracted, which is another sign of low intelligence.
How is repeatedly calling one a fool helping anything or staying on topic?That is a source that you have found and has nothing to do with what is in the documentary. You are easily distracted, which is another sign of low intelligence.
You mocked the Holy Spirit in our heart and you think I care what you have to say about me. You are in a bad place.
Because you can go so far as to repeatedly stated that we are saved by blood, but repeatedly go no further.Really! How is it to do with what colour Jesus was?
How is repeatedly calling one a fool helping anything or staying on topic?
Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk
Implying; sorryYou will need some citations to prove your accusation.
Because you can go so far as to repeatedly stated that we are saved by blood, but repeatedly go no further.
You acting like it is due to forum manners is....an act.
Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk
Implying; sorry
Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk
Can you re-word that so that it makes better sense. The OP is about Jesus' skin colour not about His Blood or the colour of His blood if that is what you are confusing.
You have repeatedly implied that someone is a fool for no good reason other that you two are speaking around one another.You need to explain what you mean there?
What? That is non-nonsensical?Let me help you...you prove that you don't have the love of God in you.
Jesus dying for our sins isn't Jesus being crucified to save us, Jesus was put to death whilst trying to save us who are sinful, by the gospel, by the word of God, preaching with the hope that many would believe and be saved from the world, and he was murdered for it, thus he died for our sins, Jesus lived to save us, we are saved by his life. Jesus was dead to the flesh and alive in God, preaching the truth hoping to save as many as would believe in him, and he was murdered for it at the hands of wicked men with wicked hearts who's father was the devil.You seem to contradict yourself? As per is bolded parts.
Christ's was the fulfilment of the sacrificial law, without His death we would not have been saved.