You compare me to keypurr, but you are the ones who are like keypurr,
I, lifeisgood, have never had any new revelation that came from no where like keypurr. You, gt, have made up your own doctrine, rejecting every single verse in the Bible that does not agree with your false doctrine. Where did you get your false doctrine that the Father came as a physical body?
you can't be reasoned with and you ignore and deny the scriptures.
Yeah, I know. You, gt, cannot make us bow down to your false doctrine.
AMR did lose that debate, but he is too delusional to see it. He follows me around and posts the link to the debate and claims he has won. However, anyone with eyes and ears can see and hear that he doesn't know how to debate, and he merely copies and paste material and doesn't directly answer any questions.
If you really, honestly believe that you, gt, won the debate, you have no idea what debate is.
Here’s how you debate:
Q: Who is Jesus?
GT: He is the Father with a physical body
Q: Where have you seen that in the Bible, can you please give a verse. Give a little bit more information of how you arrived at this conclusion.
GT: Jesus is the Father with a physical body
Q: I need a verse or a book that says something like that. A little bit more information, please.
GT: Jesus is the Father with a physical body
GT: Hooray, I, gt, won the debate.
Go look at the debate. Did AMR ever tell what essence God is besides saying God is the essence?
I did. AMR was quite articulate in his responses to you.
What a massive failure on his part.
You couldn't convince him to bow down to your false doctrine; therefore, your conclusion of "Hooray, I, gt, won the debate."
In addition, while you are at it, show where he answers anything that I say except to get out of answering the questions by speaking rhetoric as if I have done something incomplete while he is the one who really failed.
You mean when you, gt, never debated?
Hooray, I, gt, won the debate we just had.