iouae
Well-known member
Don't worry about it.
I am not.
I very particularly did not say night club so as not to offend folks like you.
But like I believe, offence is something taken, not something given.
Don't worry about it.
I am not.
I very particularly did not say night club so as not to offend folks like you.
But like I believe, offence is something taken, not something given.
What I said was too hard to grasp?
Luke 16:29 - 17:2 KJV
29 Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.
30 And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent.
31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.
01 Then said he unto the disciples, It is impossible but that offences will come: but woe unto him, through whom they come!(Mat18:7)
02 It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea,(Mat18:6) than that he should offend one of these little ones.(Mat10:42, 18:6,10,14, Mrk9:42)
But still not sure how adding to the length of the story makes it a documentary on the afterlife...
Who is "adding to the length of the story"?
I quoted the Master: and you side with a concocted chapter break to your advantage? :chuckle:
Mark 4:33-34
33 And with many such parables spake he the word unto them, as they were able to hear it.
34 But without a parable spake he not unto them: and when they were alone, he expounded all things to his disciples.
Luke 10:23-24
23 And he turned him unto his disciples, and said privately, Blessed are the eyes which see the things that ye see:
24 For I tell you, that many prophets and kings have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.
Luke 17:1a
1a Then he said unto the disciples,
actually more than 1 and the contexts hold...
oh thanks for that except the ones that are mangled and contorted in a train wreck like your logic...
what does he look like when he sleeps?
NOPE. Now you using Paul like Peter said your type would do...
We see that the text in 2 Corinthians 5:8 does not say that to be absent from the body IS to be present with the Lord. One does not equal the other.
“We are confident, yes, well pleased rather to be absent from the body AND to be present with the Lord”
So yes most of us would indeed rather be dead AND with the Lord but it does not mean being absent from the body IS being present with Him...
helped teach me this that is for sure...“Behold, I tell you a mystery: We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed— in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet“
https://www.truthaboutdeath.com/q-a...-from-the-body-is-to-be-present-with-the-lord
ummm...ok looks like Peter was wrong...your type dont just misuse Paul’s writings...
because He told Mary to tell the disciples He was ascending to His God...you know first fruits...maybe that’s when He took the theif along...but that wasn’t the TODAY of the telling...
He wasn’t...was retelling a fun story
I'll just chalk that up as the ignorant ramblings of a wanna be.
Ouch...how will I ever recover? LOL
1 Cor 1:18
I doubt you will. You seem pretty pleased with yourself, at this point.
Nawww...all glory to Him for allowing you to please me with another opportunity to show how correct Peter was about your types trying to misuse Paul’s writings for themselves...
This time into saying that absent the body is automatically and instantaneously to be with present with the Lord...despite what he actually taught
And I am pleased that now again with this:
http://www.nazarene-friends.org/pubs/thedead/009.php
Not necessarily for you but again for others to see the opportunity you provide to restore Paul to the Way he lived and taught...Him/His way...
HalleluYah...yup I am a wanna be...wanna be closer to Him/ His way
actually more than 1 and the contexts hold...
oh thanks for that except the ones that are mangled and contorted in a train wreck like your logic...
what does he look like when he sleeps?
NOPE. Now you using Paul like Peter said your type would do...
We see that the text in 2 Corinthians 5:8 does not say that to be absent from the body IS to be present with the Lord. One does not equal the other.
“We are confident, yes, well pleased rather to be absent from the body AND to be present with the Lord”
So yes most of us would indeed rather be dead AND with the Lord but it does not mean being absent from the body IS being present with Him...
helped teach me this that is for sure...“Behold, I tell you a mystery: We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed— in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet“
https://www.truthaboutdeath.com/q-a...-from-the-body-is-to-be-present-with-the-lord
ummm...ok looks like Peter was wrong...your type dont just misuse Paul’s writings...
Spot on correct.
When we die, we sleep, and in the resurrection it seems, to the resurrected dead, as if no time has passed from dying to being with the Lord, although thousands of years might have passed.
Job knew he would have to wait thousands of years for his change from mortal to immortal.
Job 14:14
If a man die, shall he live again? all the days of my appointed time will I wait, till my change come.
Explain the "wait" in this phrase if we are immediately alive after death.
Even Jesus had to wait three days and three nights.
Job would have had to wait, because Jesus had not yet come.
Do you have a NT verse that supports your position?
Sent from my iPhone using TOL
Job would have had to wait, because Jesus had not yet come.
Do you have a NT verse that supports your position?
Sent from my iPhone using TOL
The apostles liken death to sleep.
1Co 11:30
For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.
1Co 15:51
Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,
1Th 4:14
For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him
Paul specifically says that David saw corruption.
Act 13:36
For David, after he had served his own generation by the will of God, fell on sleep, and was laid unto his fathers, and saw corruption:
If David immediately went to heaven, then David would not see corruption.
This is not a technicality. All humans saw corruption. Only Jesus did not. The Father would not allow Jesus to see corruption when he was dead.
.... you have an immortal soul is implied. There is no immortal soul. Death means the cessation of life.
Well, this verse works with doctrines of immortal souls, as well.No.
This verse only makes sense if the dead are indeed dead.
1Co 15:52
In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.
I believe it was Satan's first lie that humans cannot die. "Thou shalt not surely die" since you have an immortal soul is implied. There is no immortal soul. Death means the cessation of life.
If even David saw corruption, it proves that all humans who die will see corruption as their body decays, while they wait for the resurrection at the last trump.