So then yer admitting that Dispensationism has no footing in the letters to Corinth?
I told you to have a seat, Jeff, until I decide to recognize you/engage you-"Yer outa order."
How did I do? You gonna hep me?
So then yer admitting that Dispensationism has no footing in the letters to Corinth?
Danoh ought to change his title to "Not Interested in the Truth."
That explains why he just ignores what I wrote here:
This evidence proves that the doctrine contained in the book of Hebrews is for those in the Body of Christ:
Those who received Hebrews had access into the heavenly sphere, a blessing that just applies only to those in the Body of Christ:
"Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus, By a new and living way, which he hath consecrated for us, through the veil, that is to say, his flesh" (Heb.10:19-20).
"Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need" (Heb.4:16).
It is only those who are in the Body of Christ who dwell in the very presence of God because only those in the Body have been raised up and made to sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:
"Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved); And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus" (Eph.2:5-6).
"If ye then be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God" (Col.3:1).
From this we can know that it is impossible that the book of Hebrews, which tells all "to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus," is for the future tribulation when only the high priest will have access to God. Instead, these words are speaking of the access into the heavenlies which members of the Body of Christ enjoy now. Cornelius Stam, the founder of The Berean Bible Society, wrote:
"The Holiest place of the tabernacle, still closed to Jewish believers at that time, except representatively through the High Priest once each year, reminds us of our free entrance into 'the holiest of all' in heaven itself. By grace we enter the presence of God, '. . . by the blood of Jesus . . . a new and living way, which He hath consecrated for us, through the veil, that is to say, His flesh' (Heb. 10:19,20). Think of it! The old dead way replaced by 'a new and living way,' specially consecrated to our use through the blood of Christ! This is the great Pauline doctrine of our access to God (Rom. 5:2)" [emphasis mine] (Stam, The Berean Searchlight, Volume L, Number 2).
Of course this destroys the teaching within the Neo-MAD community that the doctrine found inn the book of Hebrews is not for those in the Body of Christ.
And not even one of those who deny that the doctrine found in the book of Hebrews is for those in the body has even attempted to address these facts.
Since Danoh has no interest in the truth found in the Bible he just closes his eyes to this truth.
Still patiently waiting.......... :rotfl:
I told you to have a seat, Jeff, until I decide to recognize you/engage you-"Yer outa order."
How did I do? You gonna hep me?
"Still patiently waiting.......... "-second time for that stumper/cliche....
TOL is mesmerized... Please? "The Trifecta!!!" More!!!
"rotfl"-Jeff
Next up: Roflmao...TTYL....wink....
I see your point, but I'm convinced that the church of God refers to the "kingdom church" for lack of a better word.
Romans-Philemon: 13 letters for the dispensation of the gospel, heavenly inheritance
I did not respond to anything which Danoh said. Notice that I quoted nothing about what she said. Instead, I just explained why she should change her title.
And true to form she showed no interest in the truth which I pointed out from the book of Hebrews and how that truth can only be doctrine which is for those in the Body of Christ.
Here, let me slow it down for you son.
Yer original post to the guy was about his opinions.
Mine to you was about yers.
Now let's hear yer Dispensational opinion on where Paul got the idea Jesus said it is more blessed to give than to receive.
Sitting by patiently waiting.........
I'll take that as a concession to Tet's point.
Which was that it was to poor folks not yer buddy STP's false idea that they were Jerusalem saints who had sold everything.
So you wont offer us yer great and learned opinion on where Paul got the idea that Jesus said it is more righteous to give than to receive?
You are so confused because earlier you said this which refers to 1 Corinthians:
Slower: This is not a dating site, Jeff.
POTD=Post Of The Decade.
Certainly, Romans-Philemon is written to the body of Christ, and contains the doctrine for us to live by. Everyone mentioned in those letters, however, is not in the Body.
Is this written to the Body, Jerry?
James 4:4 Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.
Certainly, Romans-Philemon is written to the body of Christ, and contains the doctrine for us to live by. Everyone mentioned in those letters, however, is not in the Body.
I see your point, but I'm convinced that the church of God refers to the "kingdom church" for lack of a better word.
Romans-Philemon: 13 letters for the dispensation of the gospel, heavenly inheritance
Is this written to the Body, Jerry?
James 4:4 Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.
I guess he won't be getting a myspace request from you, saint john.
Tet: "More like Post of The Darby."
I hope I get to watch.