Did I say that?
Nah. I don't define things. I use terms as they are meant to be used.
Maricopa county ballot audit begins today
- Thread starter Gary K
- Start date
Did I say that?
Nah. I don't define things. I use terms as they are meant to be used.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Sure. Just don't accuse me of being a troll and a hypocrite when I'm still waiting for Derf to substantiate his accusation in the first place and which you jumped upon.
Right Divider
Body part
That can be quite confusing these days.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
You implied it at least and if you can't define what counts as "MSM" then why even use the term?
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Had to look that one up! : thumb:
Or you inferred it wrongly.
Is that a possibility?
Because I don't define what a term means.
Words have meanings apart from my use of them.
MSM means "mainstream media."
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Knowledge is power!
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Sure, it's a possibility as many things are.
I know what the term stands for but for some it seems to be akin to anything outside of fringe sources counts as such.
Right Divider
Body part
Funniest post of the year. Good one!What needs fixing?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Why thank you good sir, it was intentional!
Right Divider
Body part
I know... but it was still very funny.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Eh, the UK has a whole load of political crap and ineptitude going on, no doubt about it.
Not hardly. I dismiss anything that comes from Former Guy and his minions. Prior to the 2016 election, he claimed if he lost it would be due to voter fraud. The Orange Glob just can’t handle the FACT that he lost because there are more who hate him than support him.
The leftist news organists were the ones who insisted Trump was guilty of collusion and that the Wuhan lab had nothing to do with the development of covid. The good news organizations reported the facts which disproved the lies the leftists were propagating.
Derf
Well-known member
You mean he's guilty until proven innocent? That's not how it works here.
and again, you’re back to some standard that only you control—your opinion. Why should all news sites have to abide by that standard, especially when it’s duplicitous (that equates to hypocritical, as I’m sure you know).
Troll Hypocrisy #8? Help me out here, I’m running out of fingers.
Derf
Well-known member
Once a person only accepts his own standards, it’s never possible for him to admit wrong. So the answer’s No.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
You're running out of options more like.
I don't mean anything like you say, so quote me otherwise. I'll wait while that doesn't happen (again).
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Are you talking to a mirror? Else, quote me in regards to the supposed double standards you've accused me of. It's hardly a secret that I'm no fan of Trump. It's also in the public arena that I've declared that if there was actual and proven widespread fraud that I'd be in favour of the former election results being overturned and him being back in power if such were to be the case.
How about you Derf? You ready to retract your accusations in regards to Russia or have you got a quote of mine to back them up?
Derf
Well-known member
I’ve been giving examples of your double standards. Why do I need to always give more than I’ve given already? That’s a double standard right there, as you don’t require it of yourself. I’ll wager you have never said, “Don’t believe what I’ve written, unless I provide more evidence than I have, and tomorrow more than today.” So I don’t have to look far for that.
Re. Russia collusion, are you saying I need to provide a quote from you saying you have tangible evidence he colluded with the Russians, because Robert Mueller never found any. Apparently you should have taken Mueller’s place. Or are you saying you really do need tangible evidence, and therefore you reject any Russia collusion accusations?
Last edited: