Maricopa county ballot audit begins today

[JudgeRightly]

Cite.

For which part?

Because afaik, all of what I've said has been posted here in this very thread.

Something reputable

According to who's standards?

and that can be corroborated.

...

 

[Arthur Brain]

For which part?

Because afaik, all of what I've said has been posted here in this very thread.



According to who's standards?



...

How about objective, rational standards? Not sites that have either a heavy or discredited, far right wing bias? That would be a start because they seem to be the only ones that are making an embarrassing brouhaha over this.

 

[Derf]

How about objective, rational standards? Not sites that have either a heavy or discredited, far right wing bias? That would be a start because they seem to be the only ones that are making an embarrassing brouhaha over this.

Troll Hypocrisy #6: why do require "objective, rational standards" for others, when you don't for yourself?

 

[Derf]

How about objective, rational standards? Not sites that have either a heavy or discredited, far right wing bias? That would be a start because they seem to be the only ones that are making an embarrassing brouhaha over this.

And I forgot to add that I'm sorry you're embarrassed when your media sources are shown to be fraudulent over the very thing you're claiming to be a fraud. Troll Hypocrisy #7

 

[Arthur Brain]

Troll Hypocrisy #6: why do require "objective, rational standards" for others, when you don't for yourself?

Hey, I'm still waiting for you to substantiate your accusations in regards to Trump and collusion Derf. Got anything yet? Otherwise, yes, there are certain parameters that are the yardstick for objective and rational standards. Wingnut "news" outlets don't count.

 

[Arthur Brain]

And I forgot to add that I'm sorry you're embarrassed when you media sources are shown to be fraudulent over the very thing you're claiming to be a fraud. Troll Hypocrisy #7

No embarrassment here so no need to be sorry.

 

[marke]

Why should news outlets be obliged to jump through your hoops as to what's considered "false information"? I've followed this fiasco from the start and this latest circus was only to be expected. With regards to Ben Cotton then all of this stuff about databases being deleted has come to what exactly? Backtracking? Feeble excuses?

Considering that you've erroneously accused me of having double standards on here then your troll rubbish can be filed in the appropriate place thanks.

As evidence of serious problems in the 2020 election begins to accumulate, the leftist democrat standard procedure is to stand in the galleys and cheer for their team: "Go democrats! Give the investigators hell! Beat them down, beat them down! Make them sorry for challenging the most secure, honest, and accurate election in American history! Rah, rah!"

 

[Arthur Brain]

As evidence of serious problems in the 2020 election begins to accumulate, the leftist democrat standard procedure is to stand in the galleys and cheer for their team: "Go democrats! Give the investigators hell! Beat them down, beat them down! Make them sorry for challenging the most secure, honest, and accurate election in American history! Rah, rah!"

Hmm, does that apply to Christopher Krebs and all Republicans who weren't/aren't on board with the whole "election steal" monotony?

 

[Right Divider]

Hmm, does that apply to Christopher Krebs and all Republicans who weren't/aren't on board with the whole "election steal" monotony?

You sure spend a lot of time in other peoples politics. No life of your own?

 

[marke]

Hmm, does that apply to Christopher Krebs and all Republicans who weren't/aren't on board with the whole "election steal" monotony?

Is that how democrats plan to deny the damaging facts coming out of the investigation, claim republicans have joined democrats in claiming it is impossible and inconceivable that democrats would ever commit voter fraud?

 

[Arthur Brain]

You sure spend a lot of time in other peoples politics. No life of your own?

Funny, I got grief from Derf recently because I didn't answer him quickly enough apparently and had to point out that I have other things in life going on and TOL is hardly top priority. That answer ya? Otherwise, this is a forum and I'll post as and when I see fit and when the mood takes. Okay with you?

 

[Arthur Brain]

Is that how democrats plan to deny the damaging facts coming out of the investigation, claim republicans have joined democrats in claiming it is impossible and inconceivable that democrats would ever commit voter fraud?

Oh, I'm sure all democrats are on tenterhooks...

 

[Right Divider]

Funny, I got grief from Derf recently because I didn't answer him quickly enough apparently and had to point out that I have other things in life going on and TOL is hardly top priority. That answer ya? Otherwise, this is a forum and I'll post as and when I see fit and when the mood takes. Okay with you?

Sure... it just makes you look like a meddling outsider.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Sure... it just makes you look like a meddling outsider.

Uh, how am I 'meddling' exactly?

 

[JudgeRightly]

How about objective, rational standards? Not sites that have either a heavy or discredited, far right wing bias?

Using a genetic fallacy to exclude certain sources is neither objective nor rational.

It's also special pleading.

That would be a start because they seem to be the only ones that are making an embarrassing brouhaha over this.

The "Why" was already explained to you.

The MSM are not interested in truth.

 

[JudgeRightly]

You sure spend a lot of time in other peoples politics. No life of your own?

Probably not since the lockdowns...

 

[JudgeRightly]

. . . had to point out that I have other things in life going on and TOL is hardly top priority. That answer ya? Otherwise, this is a forum and I'll post as and when I see fit and when the mood takes. Okay with you?

This is my answer to your other question you asked me about something else in another thread.

Okay with you?

 

[Arthur Brain]

Using a genetic fallacy to exclude certain sources is neither objective nor rational.

It's also special pleading.



The "Why" was already explained to you.

The MSM are not interested in truth.

So, the "MSM" is not interested in truth but sources like TGP and similar ilk are? How about you define just what the "MSM" actually consists of.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Probably not since the lockdowns...

Cute. Wrong but hey...

 

[Right Divider]

Uh, how am I 'meddling' exactly?

It's sort of a figure of speech.
Why don't you fix your country first?