ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
when you bang out a response like this, are you even aware that your ocd meds have stopped working?
Just a System
- Thread starter serpentdove
- Start date
when you bang out a response like this, are you even aware that your ocd meds have stopped working?
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
the American "justice" system is a steaming pile of crap that is typically only defended by those dishonest enough to benefit from exploiting it for personal gain
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
wouldn't it be interesting to see town address Bob's points instead of just playing his silly game of compiling "witty" and "clever" zingers to you?
Bob appears to think you're full of crap
why not address his points?
you could start here: http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...bate-By-Bob-Enyart&p=8494&viewfull=1#post8494
She said, once again linking to a page dedicated to her personal ad hom attack on yours truly while stepping around the rebuttal on the point she declared the appropriate consideration. If hubris were a commodity SD would corner the market.
Would it be as interesting as seeing you write something about me that wasn't a gross mischaracterization? :think:
Good for ol Bob then, if true. He's entitled. :thumb:
What's that to me?
I haven't been to the thread. I've addressed the DP before. I'm against it. It allows us to put innocent people to death. Until we can be certain that's not the case, it should be off the table. So should the possibility of parole for murderers. If Bob doesn't agree with that he's entitled, again. Lots of people, laymen and lawyers, have differing opinions on the point.
It doesn't impact the fact that we have the greatest system of justice in the world in any rate.
[Discusseach: issues :idea: not :yawn: people (Eph 4:14). See: Town Heretic] She said, once again linking to a page dedicated to her personal ad hom attack ...
:yawn: Your words (Eph 4:14).
each:
Some of them were. Some of them lacked context, as I noted in debunking your ad hom "control freak" charge by noting that the quote was actually just an answer in a thread asking for suggestions for changes. Then there are your other ad homs, like "deceiver" , things that reveal your nature.:yawn: Your words (Eph 4:14).
That sort of thing.
lain:That sounds like you're hoping for a negative outcome, which is about the least Christ like inference that could be advanced.Can't wait 'til theymeet the judge of all the earth (Ps 96:13, 1 Pe 4:5).
In any event, people pursuing justice and the safety of others in an imperfect world will, I hope, be happy to see the job in the best possible hands and I don't know why you'd think that's different from any other human approximation, including love...like I have to tell you.
By which I mean it really looks like I have to.
lain:
[Town Heretic, :yawn: Your words (Eph 4:14).
:yawn: If anyone is interested in your
I don't close my threads as some cowards do.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
:yawn: If anyone is interested in yourargument, they can click the link (Eph 4:14).
I don't close my threads as some cowards do.
Your threads are pretty much closed from the get go. It's not like you actually debate but just throw spam about 14 hours a day. You've been shown up on here alone to be disingenuous and just scuttle away behind your usual crap. You honestly think nobody notices?
Cue: "proof please" along with some Dennis Prager link and a bible verse...
If you run across a thread of mine that was closed--that would have been done by a moderator
Have you ever debated? :AMR: Eph 4:14
See:
Tactics of the Left
Sure. And they can read what I have to say here in response to your bringing the link here.:yawn: If anyone is interested in yourargument, they can click the link (Eph 4:14).
lain: You do realize you did that, right?Well, the coward bit is ridiculous, but sure you do. That link by way of. No one else can post on it. You have a whole section as SD where that's the case.I don't close my threads as some cowards do.
How is that different from locking a thread? How isn't that, judging as you judge, cowardly?
Last edited:
That's how the site works.[:yawn: If anyone is interested in yourargument, they can click the link (Eph 4:14).] Sure. And they can read what I have to say here in response...
lain: That's what links are for.
That sounds suspiciously like:That's how the site works.
Sure. And they can read what I have to say here in response to your bringing the link here.:yawn: If anyone is interested in yourargument, they can click the link (Eph 4:14).
You'll note I answered on that point and why. Also, you missed my setting out your hypocrisy on the cowardice nonsense...and by missed I mean lacked an apparent answer for, but here it is again:
Well, the coward bit is ridiculous, but sure you do. That link by way of. No one else can post on it. You have a whole section as SD where that's the case.I don't close my threads as some cowards do.
How is that different from locking a thread? How isn't that, judging as you judge, cowardly?
See, that's what comes of trying to get through life on looks, I suppose. They can't help you when no one can see you. :nono:
:yawn: This thread is not about me. This thread is about the Just-a-System (Eph 4:14).
each:
That's not how you felt several times in this thread, when you felt free to drag in a link to an off site bit of locked ad hom editing of my posts.:yawn: This thread is not about me. This thread is about the Just-a-System (Eph 4:14).
But all right, back on the topic:
This thread is too often (and entirely, as you use it) an illustration of the inherent danger in approaching a statistically driven topic without any apparent understanding of the methodology involved.
Do you have any idea how many cases are adjudicated in this country every year?
Juvenile courts alone handle over 1.7 million cases. If 99% of the time the courts made the right decision that would still leave 17 thousand cases where something went wrong.
In other words, a system that was nearly perfect would leave anyone who wanted to confuse that near perfect rule with the exception thousands of cases to complain about.
We have a great system. You simply have to be able to distinguish the rule from the exception.
:yawn: Proof please (Eph 4:14).
each::yawn: Your words (Eph 4:14).
each:
You already gave it, posting that link to your off site holding pen where no one else can post. You want me to prove that you did that?:yawn: Proof please (Eph 4:14).
lain: Omitting smilies and scripture, here you are calling for a discussion of issue while not discussing the issue but leaving a link to that off site oddity of yours I noted.
Here's an earlier post. Same omissions, and here's the only other thing in the post:
Some of them, with your context and on a site that is essentially locked preventing answer, a thing you call cowardice here...well, you did before I pointed out the hypocrisy of the charge, given.
Now, I dare you to follow your own advice and address the issue related statement I made to critique your attempt to pile anecdotal impressions of the justice system and leave an impression that isn't reasonable when you consider the volume of cases involved.
[See: Town Heretic, :yawn: Your words (Eph 4:14).
:yawn: I quote you exactly (Eph 4:14).
each:
I've answered on this prior.:yawn: I quote you exactly (Eph 4:14).
I'd rather talk about the topic and your mistake in approach. You must have missed it. Here it goes again:
Do you have any idea how many cases are adjudicated in this country every year?
Juvenile courts alone handle over 1.7 million cases. If 99% of the time the courts made the right decision that would still leave 17 thousand cases where something went wrong.
In other words, a system that was nearly perfect would leave anyone who wanted to confuse that near perfect rule with the exception thousands of cases to complain about.
We have a great system. You simply have to be able to distinguish the rule from the exception.