glassjester
Well-known member
It seems that celibacy would have been the other choice.
If imprisoned, would you choose homosexuality over celibacy? I wouldn't.
Judge OK’s Petition for America’s First ‘Genderless’ Person
- Thread starter Angel4Truth
- Start date
It seems that celibacy would have been the other choice.
If imprisoned, would you choose homosexuality over celibacy? I wouldn't.
:doh: Y is the exception to X.
If X is heterosexuality then Y is its exception, homosexuality.
Are you dim?
No the question would be would you choose sex over no sex.
And I've never had to face such a dilemma...I doubt you have either.
glassjester
Well-known member
So you are saying it's possible you would choose to engage in homosexual activity, rather than no sexual activity?
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
eider
Well-known member
I've missed that......... have you got a chapter and verse for that?
Because the subject matter is general sexual orientation...heterosexuality and homosexuality.
Those are likewise exceptions...you could call them exceptions A and B.
Start a thread about them if it pleases you.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
which includes many variants
in fact, pedophilia is believed to be more common than homosexuality
We can call that one C.
glassjester
Well-known member
I would not.
I thought your position was that a heterosexual person could not choose to live a homosexual lifestyle. Are you instead saying that it is possible to do so?
Ok.
No, that's not my position.
Out of desperation or lack of an option I might choose to perform a homosexual act.
So, the question remains: Given the hypothetical prison scenario, am I now a homosexual, heterosexual or some combination?
Or rather am I still a heterosexual under unique (homosexual) circumstances?
The point is that I'm still hetero even though I chose a sexual act that belies that orientation.
Could not the opposite be true? Could I be an inherent homosexual forced by "normative" societal views to choose engagement in straight sex?
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
glassjester
Well-known member
Right. There goes that pesky external locus of control again.
If Quip found himself in the presence of only other men, he'd have "no choice" but to have sex with them (gross).
What if Quip found himself in the presence of only children? Or only animals? Or only relatives?
Insanity. Complete insanity.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
glassjester
Well-known member
I hope, for his sake, that you're right.
glassjester
Well-known member
Though Angel4Truth may be right.
It may just be too difficult for people to face cognitive dissonance.
It may just be too difficult for people to face cognitive dissonance.
My perspective is not simply limited to my own opinion. You guys are prolifically self-serving and myopic.
How would that scenario work? :idunno:
You're simply straw-man grasping.
P.S. You avoided all my questions and instead went straight to the straw-man smear.
hmmmm.... :think:
glassjester
Well-known member
Gross.
Bisexual I suppose. Although I don't believe in the recently-invented concept of fixed, innate sexual orientation. Rather than homosexual or heterosexual, you are merely sexual. Your experiences, morals, and values will determine how and with whom you choose to satisfy the sexual urge. Or, like an animal, you can just satisfy it anytime, anywhere, with whoever's available.