That's a possibility for anyone at anytime.
Judge OK’s Petition for America’s First ‘Genderless’ Person
- Thread starter Angel4Truth
- Start date
That's a possibility for anyone at anytime.
That should be obvious. Supra
ClimateSanity
New member
He feels like an apple. That's all that matters right?
Sent from my XT1254 using TheologyOnline mobile app
Is it?
ClimateSanity
New member
It's all that matters to you when a person claims to be a homosexual.
Sent from my XT1254 using TheologyOnline mobile app
So, you consider both claims as being equal?
ClimateSanity
New member
I would never accept anyone's claims to be something that isn't scientifically established. There is a thing called homosexual behavior , but no such being exists that is born to exclusively see fellow men with sexual desire.
Sent from my XT1254 using TheologyOnline mobile app
I'll assume you have "scientifically established" evidence to back this up?
ClimateSanity
New member
Do you have scientifically established evidence that some men are born with only desire for other men?
Sent from my XT1254 using TheologyOnline mobile app
Nope. Though not my standard: "I would never accept anyone's claims to be something that isn't scientifically established."
Seems we're at an impasse.
eider
Well-known member
Do you believe in the miracles of Jesus, Cephas and others?
eider
Well-known member
Hi.....
It's quite interesting, this condition where folks cannot see, recognise or understand something that they don't want to see, recognise or understand.
But genderless identity goes way back in time........ it's nothing new at all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgyny
Gender identity
For humans, androgyne (/ˈændrədʒaɪn/ AN-drə-jyn) in terms of gender identity is a person who does not fit neatly into the typical masculine and feminine gender roles of their society. Androgynes may also use the term "ambigender" or "polygender" to describe themselves. Many androgynes identify as being mentally between woman and man. They may identify as "non-gender", "gender-neutral", "agender", "between genders", "genderqueer", "non-binary", "multigender", "intergendered", "pangender" or "gender fluid". A person who is androgynous may engage freely in what is seen as masculine or feminine behaviors as well as tasks. They have a balanced identity that includes the virtues of both genders and may disassociate the task with what gender it may be socially or physically assigned to. People who are androgynous disregard what traits are culturally constructed specifically for males and females within a specific society, and rather focus on what behavior is most effective within the situational circumstance.
glassjester
Well-known member
Yes, there have been delusional people for all of human history. So?
DavidK
New member
The argument over whether homosexual desire is inherited or learned has nothing to do with Christian theology. Christians need to stop engaging in it, other than to point this out.
Our faith is not one that says, "If you were born with it, it must be natural, and therefore God must approve." When we engage with this argument as if we can prove that homosexual desire is not genetic, we get into an argument that the scripture isn't having.
Christianity, at it's core, says we need to be other than we are. We are all fallen; we are all sinful; we are all far short of what we should be. It says God knows better than us, and that if He says a thing, we should obey. It says that since none of us are obedient, we need Christ's intercession to bridge the gap between God's perfection and our complete lack.
God says the wrath of man is unrighteous. It matters not whether we find a genetic predisposition for Type A personality or if it completely learned. It is still ungodly to be wrathful and we still need Jesus' atonement to reconcile ourselves to God.
God says a man lying with a man as he does with a woman is unrighteous. It doesn't matter whether someone desires that because of genetics or environment. It's still defiling, and we still need Jesus' atonement.
If the whole of life is being "true to yourself" as you are without Christ, then we would have no need of Him, and the cross would be pointless.
Our faith is not one that says, "If you were born with it, it must be natural, and therefore God must approve." When we engage with this argument as if we can prove that homosexual desire is not genetic, we get into an argument that the scripture isn't having.
Christianity, at it's core, says we need to be other than we are. We are all fallen; we are all sinful; we are all far short of what we should be. It says God knows better than us, and that if He says a thing, we should obey. It says that since none of us are obedient, we need Christ's intercession to bridge the gap between God's perfection and our complete lack.
God says the wrath of man is unrighteous. It matters not whether we find a genetic predisposition for Type A personality or if it completely learned. It is still ungodly to be wrathful and we still need Jesus' atonement to reconcile ourselves to God.
God says a man lying with a man as he does with a woman is unrighteous. It doesn't matter whether someone desires that because of genetics or environment. It's still defiling, and we still need Jesus' atonement.
If the whole of life is being "true to yourself" as you are without Christ, then we would have no need of Him, and the cross would be pointless.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
how do you decide whether a judge has judged wisely?
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
pedophiles are counting on people like you quip :thumb:
they are absolutely sincere in their belief that they cannot help being who they are and that their actions cause no harm to the children they molest
eider
Well-known member
I can have an opinion, but a Judge's peers decide whether that Judge has judged wisely.
If necessary, a bench of Appeals Judges will decide,
If necessary a Supreme Court Judgement will decide....
What do you do, or what did you do, for a living? No..... don't..... nobody need know ..... but your special knowledge will no doubt fall short of experience to judge as well.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
The question no one will answer, why does a person need an officially recognized "gender designation" in order to remain celibate, or show no interest in sexuality?
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
i'll answer it
they don't
what's being pushed is an acceptance of "diversity"
clearing the runway for the approaching "Pedophile Express"