You are assuming, so you've said NADA, i.e., you call the shots on who is " a fellow 'Child of God'?" Says who? I assert Pate is not, by his testimony, so your "argument," as usual, is fluff.
Is Calvinism Wrong?
- Thread starter Robert Pate
- Start date
You are assuming, so you've said NADA, i.e., you call the shots on who is " a fellow 'Child of God'?" Says who? I assert Pate is not, by his testimony, so your "argument," as usual, is fluff.
I won't be able to sleep tonight, with all these meanies, ganging up on me. Stop it!!!
How did I do?
You probably went forward in one of those religious crusades and gave your heart to Jesus and now you think that you are a Christian.
I think Pate might be a tad bit autistic.
As for animals, I like wolves far more than stupid sheep.
Right, sloppy. I taught others on the perversion of "gave your heart to Jesus ," and that the 12 had no idea of the impending dbr,prior to its occurence, and now you are stealing from my exposition on these subjects.
Now we know you are also a thief, besides being a wolf, and contradicting yourself, on every other post.
We who turn of lives to Christ are Christians.
I name called Pate first, hypocrite, as, of course, you never critiqued me, did you? Yes, you did; hence, you're getting as senile as Pate, forgetting, contradicting, what you had posted earlier, re. me. Grow a spine.
Made up. That is sloppy Pate.
He spams this copy'npaste to everyone that disagrees with him, or to anyone, that he decides, sins more than he does.
I'm just getting warmed up with you. John W the jerk
Henceforth, 'Old GM' will place John W on my infamous "EGGNORE (Ignore) List." He says little or nothing of worth, in my opinion. He's what they used to call a 'Jerk Extradinaire.'
Stop attacking me!!!!
How did I do? I learned that from you.
I sense a trip to the penalty for me is imminent. Nothing like a bible believer, who just loves the sheep/babes enough to protect them from being "spiritually raped," plundered, by the ravenous, grievous wolves,by marking(name calling)/exposing/identifying them, to ruin a bible party.
Acts 20:29 KJV For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock.
Acts 20:29 KJV For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock.
Add the above slop to Paul "implied" "that Jesus is the new Adam."
As others have asked him: Which is it? Speak plainly, as the book, does.
He keeps winging it, changing his story. And I ask, a legitimate q: Why? He has no biblical justification, for making up biblical terms, changing the words of the book, to support his "doctrine." NADA.
Go ahead-ask him. Silencio.
Translation: the details of the book don't matter.
...
Last edited:
Translation: I like/prefer (fill in the blank), and, what the book says, be dayamed, and, in my opinion, " don't think that Jesus would mind me calling him the "new Adam".
There you go.....Out with the details of the book.
=an utter disdain, lack of respect, for the words of the book.
1. Oh. We did not know that you "have the freedom to interpret the Bible as I see fit."
2. He confuses objective revelation, given by objective words, with illumination/interpretation, so he just makes up biblical words, to support his "doctrine."
...
Last edited:
...
Last edited: