did you vote in the primary?
God told me who HE wants for president '16?
- Thread starter republicanchick
- Start date
did you vote in the primary?
Stop making excuses for the RNC. They in power now hate right wing conservatism.
You nailed it! :up:
No splain it to me how your unelectable, unelected man could have changed this vote? Do you think Romney could have pulled out a win in 2016?
no
because people like you would not vote for him
because people like you can't tell the difference
because people like you are not being honest
Mocking You
New member
Spot on!
so who did you vote for?
did you vote in the primary?
which candidate do you want?
Did you look out the window? See, I can ask irrelevant questions for the purpose of misdirection too. The RNC is against what is right. They are liberals.
Time to show you what the RNC wants. Statements in italics are direct quotes. I am not going to use the code and waste space.
The Republican Party is committed to domestic energy independence.
They are opposed to free markets. The funny part is in the description is they try and say they are for them, when clearly they are not. They do not want oil imported when it will lower the costs you pay at the pump due to competition. They favor monopoly control of the crop.
The Republican Party is committed to saving Medicare and Medicaid.
Very little commentary is needed when they state they prefer state controlled socialized medicine. They only want to change how it works so it better benefits them.
Medicaid, as the dominant payer in the health market in regards to long-term care, births, and individuals with mental illness, is the next frontier of welfare reform. It is simply too big and too flawed to be managed in its current condition from Washington.
No, it should be discontinued as it hurts the people that need medical care but not emergency care and it makes it unaffordable.
The U.S. Constitution is the law of the land. Judicial activism which includes reliance on foreign law or unratified treaties undermines American law. The sole solution, apart from impeachment, is the appointment of constitutionalist jurists, who will interpret the law as it was originally intended rather than make it.
No, John Boehner should have already impeached and had the illegal alien removed, and many judges that violate the law. But because he is on their side, he lets it happen.
We call on Congress to restructure the Service to ensure the continuance of its essential function of delivering mail while preparing for the downsizing made inevitable by the advance of internet communication.
The Constitution should be amended and the Post Office should be disintegrated. Packages are to be delivered by whomever I choose. They want to keep it and the money sucking industry it is intact.
While the aftermath of the 2001 terrorist attacks brought about a greater need for homeland security, the American people have already delivered their verdict on the Transportation Security Administration: its procedures – and much of its personnel – need to be changed. It is now a massive bureaucracy of 65,000 employees who seem to be accountable to no one for the way they treat travelers. We call for the private sector to take over airport screening wherever feasible and look toward the development of security systems that can replace the personal violation of frisking.
That is actually somewhat close. TSA and DHS should not exist.
Of course, in general, they don't want any of it. If they did, they would do it.
Mocking You
New member
You've already asked me this and I've already answered it.
I voted for Romney and I didn't like it.
I didn't vote in the primary because I live in Minnesota and we have the closed caucus system. There was no primary. It so happens that Ron Paulites flooded the caucuses making them irrelevant. If I would have gone to the caucus I would have supported Rick Santorum.
Right now I like Scott Walker. I like Huckabee but I don't think he's electable. If Jeb Bush or Chris Christie gets the nomination I'll write someone in. I'm done voting for the Republican just because he's a Republican.
The Republicans trounced the Dems in the November elections. Then Boehner decides to reach compromises with the outgoing Dems on spending issues and others issues last December instead of passing a continuing resolution for 45 days of emergency funding and waiting to take up a full budget with the new GOP majority. He basically gave the Dems 2015 as a going away present.
So why should conservatives be optimistic that the GOP will champion their issues going forward when they caved in to a lame duck Congress?
Next cave in? DHS funding and Obama's immigration executive order.
btw my question was not irrelevant since you complain so much about the republican party
and
we have to assume you are just a shill for the democratic party
if
you don't vote in the primary
drbrumley
Well-known member
So 70 million more babies are aborted? No, we will gladly stand in your way.
With a re-publican majority Supreme Court. But hey, vote in that primary.
drbrumley
Well-known member
So Chrys is a socialist, maybe even a fascist. ANY person who is in favor of the pipeline, you are no Conservative. You are to be labeled henceforth a socialist at least, a fascist at worst.
Chrys here has no issue whatsoever of allowing a FOREIGN company to kick AMERICANS off their own property.
The fact that a government can force you off your own property shows that property rights are not secure, even in the U.S. As the great economist Murray Rothbard put it:
“Certainly no one can say that the inviolability of private property is protected by the government. And when government confers this power on a particular business, it is conferring upon it the special privilege of taking property by force.”
drbrumley
Well-known member
:up: Chrys, Take heed of Nick is telling you.
Besides the guy who is pretending to be a Republican,
who are your favorite Libertarian candidates for the upcoming election brumley?
drbrumley
Well-known member
Besides the guy who is pretending to be a Republican,
who are your favorite Libertarian candidates for the upcoming election brumley?
You just can't resist can you? Before you hijack this thread with your partisan politics, create another thread.
Because eminent domain is a bad thing (or at least in the Libertarian world of people like brumley it is).
By the way brumley, did you know that eminent domain has been around since biblical times and that the 5th Amendment to the US Constitution allows it? (You Libertarians are constitutionalists aren't you brumley?).
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/eminent+domain
The thread is about the upcoming Presidential election in case you hadn't noticed.
Here's a list to choose from (Drew Carey?).
http://2016.libertarian-party.org/