That's not the point.
The point is that Dispensationalism didn't exist for almost 1,800 years until Darby invented it.
No, punk, here is the point:
1. It's irrelevant as to when truth is discovered, devil boy. Craigie once again asserts that Roman Catholicism is true, "The Reformation" in the 1500's is false, and "Spherical earth-ism" is false, as the earth is flat. As STP points out, according to Tellalie, if no one taught, or even heard that Jesus is the Christ until 1830, it would prove him to be an invention and a fraud. And Tellalie asserts that God the Father was not God the father, until the Lord Jesus Christ revealed Him as such.
The punk still spams this sophistry, after 4 years, as one of his main "arguments" against MAD/dispensationalism. It is sophistry, and satanic. And he lied about it. To wit, one of his over 10 "I never said"'s, where I caught him lying:
2. "
That's not my argument. I have never said that dispensationalism was "wrong" because of how old it was. I specifically said that no one taught about Christ coming back twice before Darby did."-Tet.
The habitual liar of TOL-Craigie Tellalie
As for fallible and infallible, there has only been one man to ever walk planet earth who was infallible, and that was Christ Jesus.
Caught, in another lie, as one of his other satanic "arguments," of sophistry, is that dispensationalism is false, either
because it is taught by:
-men, or,
-infallible men
He asserts that he is taught by infallible men, proving that he lied again, when he said "there has only been one man to ever walk planet earth who was infallible, and that was Christ Jesus," as he does not believe that.
He asserts that one of his "arguments" against dispensationalism is that is taught by "fallable men:"
"The reason you don't know is because there is no one name of who invented Preterism.All anyone has to do is google "who invented Dispensationalism" to find over 50,000 pages showing it was Darby.D o the same with Preterism, and you won't find any consensus for one person.That should tell you something. -Craigie
So, he admits that he follows the teachings of men, Preterist teachers, after years of sophistry, deceit, in criticizing us meanie MADists, for "following the teachings of men," while denying that he does.
Here, he claims his Preterism/AD 70-ism, is taught by infallible men, in contrast to dispensatiomnalism:
"Yes Mr. Whalen, they were
fallible men who invented dispensationalism just over 150 years ago.Mr. Whalen, you might want to ask yourself
why you follow the teachings of these fallible men?"-Tet., the Preterist/Roman Catholic
Show us these fallible men we should follow, Craigie, as you say you claim you follow.
Are not all men fallible, devil boy? If so, how does your "they were
fallible men who invented dispensationalism just over 150 years ago" say anything, but prove that you engage in deceptive argumentation, sophistry, to satisfy your obsession?
"A secret parenthetical time period is a false theory
made up by fallible men.”-Preterist con man “tetelestai,” AKA Craigie
"MAD is a false non-Biblical belief system that was
made up by fallable men."-Preterist Craigee Tet.
Show us these fallible men we should follow, Craigie, as you say you claim you follow.
Are not all men, fallible, devil boy? If so, how does your "they were
fallible men who invented dispensationalism just over 150 years ago" say anything, but
prove that you engage in deceptive argumentation, sophistry, to satisfy your obsession?
"Of course, the mutt follows the teachings of infallible men, such as the pope, right Wimpy?
More hypocrisy:
"Do the same with Preterism, and
you won't find any consensus for one person."-Craigie
Vs.
"MAD cannot even agree on........................................."-Tettie, over, and over again, on TOL
Take a bow, actress.
And it is sophistry, satanic, when he "argues" that others "follow the teachings of men," as all he has to do is make his case, all of us have been taught by men, as that is one of the teaching ministries within the boc. Should we follow you,Craigie? Are you a man?(rhtorical q).
