Neither you, nor mysteryboy has made one post relating to the topic of the thread.
The two of you have done nothing but try to twist everything I have said.
Does Luke 19:44 disprove Preterism?
- Thread starter George Affleck
- Start date
Neither you, nor mysteryboy has made one post relating to the topic of the thread.
The two of you have done nothing but try to twist everything I have said.
Tets all messed up now. He don't know which way is up. He's
disoriented and headed for the mat, then, the count.
1,2,3,4,5, etc. Both Tet and Luis De Alcazar have been KOed!
He's lost the game. And, being the bad loser he and Luis De Alcazar are,
they have to continue to swing wildly, but not hit anything.
And what happens to anyone who is still alive?
What scriptures?
So you think this....
1Th 4:15 For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.
1Th 4:16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
1Th 4:17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
Happens each time that a believer dies?
Paul isn't the only person to talk about being caught up though. Jesus talked about people suddenly being gone as well.
I said it aligns perfectly with Matt 24:34 and other passages.
Yes, I believe Dispensationalism is a false man made system invented by John Nelson Darby, that does not line up with scripture, is contrary to scripture, and can very easily be proven wrong with scripture.
I never said preterism was perfect.
And, I made it clear preterism isn't a "system" like Dispensationalism is.
I said anything that aligns perfectly with scripture is not man made, it's a validation of the scripture.
No, there are some valid things Dispensationalism teaches that are true.
Anything you say, is already twisted.
Luis De Alcazar would beg to defer with you.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Was he a preterist when he played 3rd base for the Padres?
Stay on the mat Tet. You're down for the count. Now look who is embarrassing
themselves? Both Tet and the dearly departed Luis De Alcazar.
themselves? Both Tet and the dearly departed Luis De Alcazar.
musterion
Well-known member
Which as an eschatological system makes it perfect and infallible, given your eschatological bent.
As an eschatological system, yes you did. Just did, in fact. Again.
:think:
If it's not Scripture...but aligns perfectly with and validates Scripture...but it's not man-made...what is it? Stuff like this is why you're creepy.
Square that circle sometime.
I don't know.
(Rev 20:5) (The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.) This is the first resurrection.
Yes, which is why Paul said "alive and remain".
Jesus spoke of the wicked being removed before the righteous. (the tares are gathered first and burned before the wheat is gathered)
Paul spoke of the dead in Christ rising first.
Tet is half Catholic/half cultist.
Tet is plagued by "Twilight Zone" reasoning.
Hey Tet, Does Christ sit on the throne of David for a thousand years?
Does Tet really believe that Satan is already chained up for a thousand years?
I never said that.
No I didn't.
I couldn't even answer Kmo's question about what happens to the people on earth after the thousand years is over.
The only thing creepy is your obsession of trying and catch me in a "gotcha".
This all comes down to the fact that you are embarrassed that most of your belief system was invented by John Nelson Darby.
It drives you crazy.
Does Tet believe that Christ has already/or is sitting on the throne of David now?
And, yours by Luis De Alcazar a Catholic priest.