Who says that phrases are not true?
If you'd read the post I wrote, to which you are reacting, here, you'd know that I, in that very post, clearly said that phrases are not true, nor false.
Yes. Did you really not read the post you're reacting to? Clearly, in that post, I said that phrases are not true, nor false.
Sorry, that is not acceptable as scriptural evidence.
Sorry, but your shallowness and incompetence to deal with the objections I've leveled against your doctrinal stupidities is not acceptable as a benchmark for good judgement regarding what the Bible teaches.
Have you not read where Jesus stated in Matthew 5:18
Matthew 5:18
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one
jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Seems to me, as far as Jesus Christ is concerned, the jots and tittles in God's word are not only true but will be fulfilled.
Since, in your self-righteous sanctimony, you manifest yourself to be an enemy of logic, there's simply very little, if anything, I can do for you. Like it or not, phrases (to be specific,
non-propositional phrases) are not true, nor are they false. Only propositions are true, or false. Perhaps I ought to be a bit more specific: whatever does not consist of a subject and a predicate is neither true, nor false. Every phrase that does not consist of a subject and a predicate is neither true, nor false.
The
non-propositional phrase, "black dog", is neither true nor false, but the
proposition, "The neighbor's pet is a black dog", is either true, or false. Pretty simple.
Also, tell me where, exactly, in Scripture, you imagine you have learned that a phrase is a jot and/or a tittle.
The phase [sic] "God the Son" contradicts the clear meaning of the son of God.
Stop being an idiot. The phrase, "God the Son", does not contradict anything, since it is not something that consists of a subject and a predicate. The proposition, "Jesus is God the Son", on the other hand, is a true proposition, and is contradictory to the heretical, anti-Christ falsehood you champion, "Jesus is not God the Son".
You perform a farce when you pretend to be concerned about jots and tittles, seeing as you clearly pay little attention to the details of your own written ravings.
Is Mary the mother of Jesus?
I can go so far as to say that, while Mary was on Earth, she was the mother of Jesus, sure.
Does "son of Mary" mean the same thing as "Mary the son"?
I do not assume that your phrase, "Mary the son", means something, so I have no reason to think you've asked a question, here. You do understand that merely sticking a question mark on the end of a string of words does not make something into a question, right?
The two phrases contradict each other.
No, they do not. No phrase contradicts anything; thus, no phrase contradicts another phrase; thus, the phrase, "son of Mary" does not contradict your nonsense phrase, "Mary the son".
No less does [sic] the two phrases, "son of God" and "God the Son" [sic]
There's yet another shining exemplification of your oh so scrupulous concern for attentiveness to jots and tittles. Thanks.
Again: No, the phrases, "the Son of God" and "God the Son", are not contradictory of one another, nor are they contradictory to anything else.
For that matter, Jesus is never, described as "God the Son" in scripture, yet at last count, Jesus is referred to as the "son of God" about 68 times in scripture.
You've already tried using this trite, futile ploy. All you're doing is making yourself into Captain Obvious by pointing out that the phrase, "the Son of God", is used in the Bible, and that the phrase, "God the Son", is not used in the Bible. And, so what? That's all you've got, and that's worthless for you in terms of what you're trying to do with it. Pointing out the Bible's nonuse of the phrase, "God the Son", is as useless to the question of whether or not Jesus is God the Son, as pointing out the Bible's nonuse of the phrase, "the Father of the Son of God", is useless to the question of whether or not God the Father is the Father of the Son of God.
Notice that, when you say that the Son of God is not God the Son, or when you say that the Bible denies that the Son of God is God the Son, I'm just going to turn your hypocrisy right back upon you by asking you to tell me where, in the Bible, Jesus is described as "NOT God the Son". That's right: Nowhere in the Bible do we find the phrase, "NOT God the Son". Your false doctrine--that Jesus is not God the Son--is extra-Biblical.
I accept what scriptures says about Jesus Christ.
Were that true, then you'd not be the Christ-blaspheming, anti-Christ heretic you are.