Let me dodge that one until I see if Kdall answers my challenge. If my reply to him doesn't answer you... please ask again.*
It's been answered
Let me dodge that one until I see if Kdall answers my challenge. If my reply to him doesn't answer you... please ask again.*
It's pretty obvious from your before and after statements.The fact that you think you corrected me is amusing,
OK. ... good. But why do you think this 'feature' is vestigial?Kdall said:Fine. If you want one example here it is: arrector pili (the things that cause goosebumps)
It's pretty obvious from your before and after statements.
OK. ... good. But why do you think this 'feature' is vestigial?
Really good comments! .. mostly
But.... you have things backwards slightly. It was Barbarian trying to move goal posts who brought the word 'useless' into this particular conversation.*
REVIEW
6days: "We have knowledge of mutation rates, genetic drift, sexual selection, adaptation, so called "junk DNA, so called 'vestigial organs, 'Psuedogenes' and more.
And then we have BELIEFS about our common Designer... or common ancestor."
Barbarian: "of course, there are many, many vestigial organs, such as the appendix. Please don't bother showing us the creationist misconception that "vestigial" means "useless.
OK. ... good. But why do you think this 'feature' is vestigial?
Some time ago...I think it was you who mentioned Bible discrepancies. *I asked you to pick the best example...just one that you thought was the real deal. If it was you... you refused and listed several.*
Now... same thing again... I challenged you with "But, since you think there are countless vestigial parts....list the one you think is most and let's discuss it."
Afraid to list your best example? You think you need backups incase your #1 example fails?*
BTW... you arw welcome for the science class today learning about the coccyx and appendix.
The fact that you think you corrected me is amusing, but I digress
Fine. If you want one example here it is: arrector pili (the things that cause goosebumps)
Beat me
Your assumptions in that statement are all based on your belief system... not science. Evolutionists have made similar arguments in the past about many organs they thought had become useless due to common ancestry. Science later proved them wrong.In other mammals, the arrector pili serve the purpose of fluffing hair up in order to increase body warmth. We no longer even have the hair necessary to make these pili useful
Your assumptions in that statement are all based on your belief system... not science. Evolutionists have made similar arguments in the past about many organs they thought had become useless due to common ancestry. Science later proved them wrong.
Likewise with goosebumps.... there are other possible Answers than just dismissing something as vestigial because you don't understand it. Also, it possible we have features that God designed into us which have lost function due to mutations and genetic burden.
BTW.... goosebumps quite likely are a heightened emotional response.... nothing at all to do with hairy ancestors.
It's possible for us to have a useless organ that has nothing to do with common ancestry beliefs. Our bodies have the accumulated effect of thousands of years of mutations. We are not as fit as God's original design.ISo let me ask you directly, is it possible for an organ to perform a useful function, and yet be vestigial?
Except of course, people live longer than 100 years ago, 500 years ago, 1000 years ago, 3000 years ago, 15,000 years ago.It's possible for us to have a useless organ that has nothing to do with common ancestry beliefs. Our bodies have the accumulated effect of thousands of years of mutations. We are not as fit as God's original design.
OK. ... good. But why do you think this 'feature' is vestigial?
In other mammals, the arrector pili serve the purpose of fluffing hair up in order to increase body warmth. We no longer even have the hair necessary to make these pili useful
Your assumptions in that statement are all based on your belief system... not science. Evolutionists have made similar arguments in the past about many organs they thought had become useless due to common ancestry. Science later proved them wrong.
Likewise with goosebumps.... there are other possible Answers than just dismissing something as vestigial because you don't understand it. Also, it possible we have features that God designed into us which have lost function due to mutations and genetic burden.
BTW.... goosebumps quite likely are a heightened emotional response.... nothing at all to do with hairy ancestors.
Translation: "Oh no.....I'm clearly wrong......deflect, deny, dodge, and repeat."
True... Good post.
My comment was last on the previous page. I want to make sure everyone saw your ridiculous comeback
You didn't like that your assumptions are based in beliefs... not science?
My comment was last on the previous page. I want to make sure everyone saw your ridiculous comeback
Dear Kdall,
I don't think 6days comeback is ridiculous whatsoever. It makes sense to me. Goosebumps are completely unnecessary, but did perhaps be an asset to those ancestors of ours. Maybe a sensation of fear, or danger being near, or watching something awesome.
Bless You For Being There, Kdall,
Michael
Except of course, people live longer than 100 years ago, 500 years ago, 1000 years ago, 3000 years ago, 15,000 years ago.
The reason it is ridiculous is that in other mammals it has a very clear function. We know exactly what they are for, yet 6days wants to pretend like there is no evidence trail leading to an answer, and instead decided that, to paraphrase, "God wanted to give us goosebumps because he thought they were cool, and he gave them to every other mammal because they have a function." See the disconnect there?
Let’s see how this plays out. A prophet of God on a faraway world, explaining Christ to the inhabitants:If there is life on other planets... Christ died for them!
By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.