I'm going to keep posting the science, unlike yourself.
10 Vaccines That Saved The World
- Thread starter User Name
- Start date
- Status
I'm going to keep posting the science, unlike yourself.
elohiym
Well-known member
You are posting pop-culture videos, not science.
Res works with "the weak, sick and elderly," i.e., people who are at high risk for complications from the flu which can be deadly. I, on the other hand, do not work with people at high risk, am not exposed to them, and I'm not at risk myself, so I'm neither "a danger to society" nor "a hypocrite." But thanks for asking.
elohiym
Well-known member
You encounter the "the weak, sick and elderly" in public everyday, hypocrite. Flu kills more people than measles, but you don't feel like getting the vaccine.
ClimateSanity
New member
Science does not equal the progressive agenda. Scientists follow the scientific method. Scientists never shy away from evidence even if it comes from non " peer reviewed " sources.
Thanks to the measles vaccination, measles hardly kills anybody anymore (at least in the USA): http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs286/en/
Why do you call yourself a "Left Winger" on your profile? Clearly, you are misrepresenting yourself.
elohiym
Well-known member
It killed relatively few people before the vaccine in the U.S., and people viewed the virus as generally harmless. People used to bring their children to measles teas to intentionally infect them, which is why the rates of infection were so high before the vaccine. Now the rates of infection are the highest in history because the vaccine is an attenuated live measles virus; they just don't call an intentional measles infection by vaccination a case of the measles. The pharmaceutical companies found a way to get people to buy an infection they were getting for free from their neighbors.
elohiym
Well-known member
It's an old thread. He revived it to spread more mindless vaccine propaganda.
Then why are their no peer reviewed studies? Sure, they have experience, they also have an agenda.
elohiym
Well-known member
What sort of study would you need to see?
What agenda and motive do you think they have?
Double blind peer reviewed study.
elohiym
Well-known member
Proving what specifically?
That vaccines don't work. Or that vaccines cause autism. Or that vaccines cause {insert calamity of choice}.
A thousand pardons. I will return to my quiescence.
ClimateSanity
New member
Why dodge my point? I'm a thinking left winger as opposed to those who follow the latest talking points and who choose what to think about an issue based on what the movers and shakers of our side says, although there really is no side.
Ten faith healings and prayers that an average Christian has offered up that solved their problems:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Please fill in the blanks. When you are finished, put down your pencils and lie your head on your desk.
elohiym
Well-known member
We are discussing an article I posted specifically about polio. Can't you follow the discussion? What do you disagree with in Dr. Humphries article? What studies are needed to prove her specific claims? Did you even read the article?
- Status