Search results

So God's vision to Daniel wasn't meant to be taken as an accurate literal 70 weeks. Or, the shortening of days was not about the 70 weeks.

To say it is a MAD cherry pick doesn't mean MAD is the only ism that cherry picks it.

Except further details in another verse says one given Him was lost. John 17:12 ESV (12) While I was with them, I kept them in your name, which you have given me. I have guarded them, and not one of them has been lost except the son of destruction, that the Scripture might be fulfilled.

Well yeah. A doctrine in which you can reject faith in YHWH for faith of another. Saved by grace through faith becomes saved by grace through any type of faith anyone decides to holds to.

Now you resort to lies. I have maintained all along that salvation unto eternal life is by grace through believing faith, not works.

Thank you. I've always found it odd that so many can readily see the characters and events of Israel as a typology of a greater character and event, but can't see Israel itself as typology of the greater.

So you don't think Paul's teaching promises us that our corruptible bodies will someday be changed to incorruptible just because he didn't use the specific word of "promise" in the verse that tells us it will happen. What do you think he meant by it? A maybe?

This just shows what a foolish man you are being and how your doctrine contradicts itself. I make the point that one cannot have salvation unto eternal life if they turn from believing faith in YHWH alone to unbelieving faith in rebellion to YHWH. You argue against it and say anyone can have...

edit wrong thread

The solutions the left comes up with are monstrous. Most of their solutions cause more debauchery than benefit.

I'm not doing that. I don't want folks to become stagnate in their search for truth as if they have already learned all they need to know about the salvation of our great God and Savior. There's layers upon layers in scripture meanings.

Ummm, I thought it was the "promise". Which is also a promise. Right, definitions change depending on what ism you want it to adhere to. Every ism I know does that when necessary to uphold their ism. In your ism we don't have a promise of our corruptible bodies changed to incorruptible. It...

Yeah, the oldies like John MacArthur, Chuck Missler, Chuck Smith, etc. did that a lot. I loved it! But yeah, they would rubber band it at times and stretch it to the limits! But you definitely knew the whole book afterwards and could spot those times when you thought "Hold on, I don't think the...

Matthew 12:22-23 KJV (22) Then was brought unto him one possessed with a devil, blind, and dumb: and he healed him, insomuch that the blind and dumb both spake and saw. (23) And all the people were amazed, and said, Is not this the son of David? Why do they have the notion that the son of...

2 Timothy 3:8 KJV (8) Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. Ya ain't gonna find them in the Canon. But you do in other ancient writings.

Easier said than done when one thinks "scriptures" is only the Canon declared by the RCC. Examples coming.

Or ...... perhaps "those days" are not the same days contained in the 70 weeks of Daniel chapter 9 so that both prophecies are accurate. "Elaborating" would be adding additional info, not changing the info.

It's the same standard of neither having yet received the promise. We are all still waiting for the complete fulfillment of the promise.

You haven't yet received the promise of your flesh body being changed from corruptible to incorruptible. But you have an earnest expectation of it. Apply the same standard to both promises.

This may come as a shock, but every ism cherry picks while claiming they don't. That's why you see every ism accusing the other ism of doing it. They think they are being witty by saying such things when it's actually worthless drivel to say to anyone in any argument since they will fire the...