Search results

That's because you're blinded.

Unfortunately we live in an age of isims. You'll hardly find any theology site that will study through a book of the bible verse by verse. Instead, they only plant platitudes of their particular ism. Theology stores are packed full of books on isms that sell like hotcakes. But the section of...

I beg to differ. By claiming one prophesy doesn't have to be accurate because of God's love, then the logical conclusion is that same reasoning can apply to any of them. Nothing prevents that reasoning from applying to only end times prophesy. But that's the cherry picking that has to happen to...

If there was already multiple ways to be saved unto eternal life then Christ didn't need to die. There has always been only way to be saved unto eternal life. Claiming there have been multiple ways is bogus to the core.

Did Abe have the details or not????

Mine too. David said "Blessed be the man in whom God does not impute sin". If that could be done without the details of Christ dying and rising, then He died in vain because there was already a way. Job said he knew his redeemer lived and he would see God after his earthly body died. But some...

One could counter the accuracy of any prophecy using that. All the prophesies MAD claims is only accurate for Israel could be countered with it because God's love for all of mankind could trump it. It's a MAD cherry pick.

By their fruit you shall know. If any of the 70 weeks are shortened then the 70 weeks prophesied by Daniel is not accurate.

Then your viewpoint would have Glorydaz be wrong for saying Abe didn't have the details required to be saved before he died.

Again, this version of d'ism says one that has already died can be saved after their death by getting details at some later time.

Right, so Daniel's prophesied 70 weeks may not be 70 weeks at all.

By that logic no one before Christ died did. That's generations and generations of mankind that died without any hope of salvation. Your version of d'ism suggests that any man can die and still be able to believe after that.

Or you are. Calvin loved to use that tactic on others.

You might be reading that wrong.

None of the works he did or didn't do afterward could annul him being justified by believing faith alone. Romans chapter 4 gives a lot of detail about it.

There ya go! I wish everyone would approach the Bible without any baggage of MADism, Calvinism, universalism, etc. Because once you get saddled with one of them then you start trying to force scripture to comply to the ism.

We are saved by the same gospel Abraham had ---- believing faith without works. Just as Paul tells us. Surely you don't think that could only apply to people 2000 years later when Paul lived. Paul also tells us the law that came afterwards (after Abe was justified by believing faith without...

I propose that they have heard of or saw the mighty deeds YHWH (the God of Israel) has done and they have decided to choose the winning God. Rahab did the same when the spies came. "Hey guys, I've heard of the might deeds your god YHWH has done, and I believe I'll choose that one as well!"...

It is Paul talking to Gentiles! He is telling the Gentiles he's talking to that they too will be cut off if they switch from believing to unbelieving just as the Israelites are cut off for switching from believing to unbelieving. Paul repeatedly tells believers to have enduring belief and to...

That prophesy tells how Gentiles recognize that the true Most High God is the God of Israel. Not because Israel told them so, but because God demonstrated it.