Search results

They both taught the gospel of eternal salvation was by means of the risen Lord. They both taught that their circumcision of the flesh and the law of Moses was not the means of eternal salvation. They both taught God was not through with promises to Israel.

That it has errors doesn't make it not be God's word.

The KJV is not without error.

The newest sack of horse dooky Showtime has to offer. Ben Shapiro reacts to the trailer for Showtime's upcoming documentary series, "Everything's Gonna Be All White." 12 minute video

Yep, the council of Jerusalem should put it to rest that they were all on board with the same gospel of salvation unto eternal life which was only by the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. And yeah, those two verses you listed are clear as a bell. They all believed God put no...

Paul uses future tense also. Romans 5:10 KJV (10) For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. Don't let tenses trip you up.

Then what is this "other faiths" you are talking about that lead to eternal life?

The council at Jerusalem should put to rest that the gospel unto eternal life through the resurrected Lord Jesus Christ was the same one they all were preaching. They all taught that circumcision of the flesh and works of the law of Moses were not the criteria for eternal life.

How do you figure they did not have the same faith? They both put their trust in the God of gods and no other.

Agreed. There are lots of writings we have now that shed light on much. And as for the Dead Sea Scrolls, there are a lot of fragments that have not yet been pieced together. What a goldmine they are!

Me too. The other 1 of out 4 probably think it while not saying it.

I don't think most deny there were not different instances of good news pertaining to different things. The specific good news inquired about is which one makes eternal life possible for mankind.

We can couple that with: 1 Samuel 16:23 ESV (23) And whenever the harmful spirit from God was upon Saul, David took the lyre and played it with his hand. So Saul was refreshed and was well, and the harmful spirit departed from him. But it kept coming back.

OK, thanks anyway.

You can call it whatever you want to. I view the Canonized books as being a compilation of the manuscripts they had available to them at the time. And I think declaring the Canon closed way back then may have been a bit premature. Tons of manuscripts have been found since then. And the Dead...

Is it new to the MAD camp that Daniel's 70 weeks prophesy is the result of a shortened timeline, or has MAD always taught that?

Oh my gosh! I bet you've never said that before. You must not be the real Glorydaz. Look at what you have to do to the text to force it to fit your ism. Seventy weeks was just a shortened time from who knows what. Remove the shortened days from being part of the 70 weeks and you don't have to...

So you don't think we are promised to have our corruptible bodies changed to incorruptible. OK. But I certainly do.

ROFL! Jesus is YHWH. Just have a mod check my IP so ya'll can stop this nonsense.

Atta boy!