Why men won't marry you
- Thread starter serpentdove
- Start date
elohiym
Well-known member
It's weird for you to call a woman in her mid-thirties a "chick." That is what some men call women. In another post you claimed you meant teenager by "chick," so your comment appears even stranger.
elohiym
Well-known member
False accusation. Libel.
elohiym
Well-known member
You don't nitpick over your "friend's" use of the word chick.
elohiym
Well-known member
She doesn't get negged a lot, other than from you. I've seen her user CP. You are stalking her. The reps have little effect on her reputation so you're wasting your time and just revealing how hate-filled you are.
1 John 3:15 Everyone who hates his brother is a murderer; and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him.
elohiym
Well-known member
That is an example of you agreeing with someone who is bearing false witness, promoting a lie about us. My wife has no brothers, and the poster Voltaire is not related to either of us.
elohiym
Well-known member
Here A4T is continuing to promote the lie after my wife corrected Cabinetmaker. Further, she implies my wife was inappropriately involved with another man. Disgusting behavior for a so-called Christian.
As I said, it was iffy. I remember the thread where you changed your name and then Dolo changed his name and then the whole thing got very confusing. I lost track of who was who.
In any case, 1PM has called Rusha a fascist and then BOLOCAT did as well. What ever the relationships are between the people involved, BOLOCAT's use of the word fascist was odd based on the conversation in this thread. I noted that it gave credibility towards Rusha's claim that BOLOCAT's was a scok puppet. Given that BOLOCAT was recently banned as a sock puppet, looks like she was pretty accurate in her assessment.
elohiym
Well-known member
A4T flew off the handle early in the discussion before she accused me of abusing my wife and betting her life on it. She claimed falsely that I posted under the user name jeremysdemo and other user names. Unable to find the evidence and too cowardly to face her bet, she conveniently forgets it and spends much of the rest of the thread trying to trash my wife, and claims when I allegedly do it, it's abuse.
If there is physical abuse, she must learn to defend herself (e.g. martial arts). He will be held accountable for his actions before God. 1 Pe 3:7, Mt 5:27–32
elohiym
Well-known member
He had been reading the vaccine thread where Rusha was called a fascist because of her authoritarian viewpoint. You remember that thread, right? That's the thread where you attacked my wife relentlessly, misrepresenting her position every chance you had, but at the same time had one your daughters asking my wife for information about vaccines privately. Was that some sort of sick game you were playing?
elohiym
Well-known member
But you don't attack her for promoting homosexual marriage. Instead you falsely claim my wife and I "promote child marriage." Hypocritical much?
Elo, 1PM, A4T, and Rusha, You all need to stop this. It doesn't matter who started it (I've been reading all of this stuff, so I know who started it.). Just stop! This whole thing is getting old. A4T and Rusha, both of you should put Elo and 1PM on ignore. Elo and 1PM, both of you should put A4T and Rusha on ignore. I consider all four of you friends. I will not choose sides in all of this. But, I will start handing out infractions if you all don't stop.
elohiym
Well-known member
Total falsehood. I said no such thing ever.
Oh no. My daughter greatly appreciated your wife's help. She was working on a paper for English and you wife's input was beneficial. She did okay on the paper. My daughter is like me, very analytical. Her English teacher was much more touchy-feely so my daughter got graded a little harshly. She still did fine in the class, just an interesting part of college education. I believe I thanked 1PM for her help and if I didn't, Thank you 1PM for your help, my daughter appreciated it as it better helped her to understand the anti-vaxx arguments.
As to my "attacking" your wife, I was careful to attack her positions, not her character. While I do not agree with your and hers viewpoints on a fair number of topics, I do not doubt that you are my bother and sister in Chirst, that you strive to serve God to the best of your ability, that you are happily married and that you raising a happy and healthy family. That said, I see no reason not to vigorously oppose your positions on marrying young and vaccinations.
elohiym
Well-known member
Okay. Your daughter used my wife and never told us that was her intent. My wife didn't give her any anti-vaxx arguments, just directed her to government websites and National Vaccine Information Center. You couldn't do that for your daughter? Pffft.
False.
Your wife offered her honest opinion and provided references. 1PM was not mentioned or slandered in any way. Instead, my daughter was able to provide accurate references to antivaccination materials. My daughter did not misrepresent 1PM. That my daughter does not agree with you, even after following the links provided, should come as no big surprise. At least she looked at it honestly.
As you wish.
Just don't forget that if a woman initiates physical violence, she's no longer a woman.If there is physical abuse, she must learn to defend herself (e.g. martial arts). He will be held accountable for his actions before God. 1 Pe 3:7, Mt 5:27–32Real men don't hit women.
Someone should have told that to Bruce Jenner! Might have saved him some medical expenses....
linger: The pope would agree with you. Matt. 19:6, Rom. 7:2, 3Maybe you could put his picture on your wall like the CathOlics. :freak:
Last edited: