Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
I've exposed both Daddy Paul and Jr. Paul in an earlier thread. Jr. Paul is more polished than the old geezer (while Jr. embraces homosexuality and decriminalizing recreational drugs, he avoids hot topics like kiddy porn):
ABSOLUTELY WEAK, and LIBELOUS.
You're a fine one to be talking about libel. Your recent attempt at smearing the late great anti communist J. Edgar Hoover is just once example of you doing so.
From my thread "The Politically Incorrect Truth About Martin Luther King Jr." :
Edward S. Miller, a lifetime FBI man of high rank and stature, recently passed away at the age of 89. A good man and good American, Miller, who was also a veteran of World War II (Okinawa), faithfully served his family, country, and God. He also faithfully served the agency that hired him in 1950, as well as the longtime head of that agency, J. Edgar Hoover.
I was fortunate to spend a long Saturday afternoon with Ed Miller back in March, at long last meeting him after previously only corresponding with him. (He was an alumnus of Grove City College, where I teach.) It was a time I won't forget, and Miller had some things he wanted me not to forget -- and to share with the public. Foremost among them was his take on J. Edgar Hoover. He wanted the world to know what he insisted was the real J. Edgar Hoover --
"...Ed Miller told me that the claims of Hoover having Clyde Tolson as a "gay lover" were "absolutely false." He said that Hoover was a heterosexual who had love affairs with beautiful women such as the glamorous actress Dorothy Lamour. Their romance, in fact, almost led to marriage. Hoover, however, was married to his job. "She dumped him because he was married to his job!" said Miller. "He had one hell of an interesting job, Paul. And he was always very busy."
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ther-King-Jr&p=4906526&viewfull=1#post4906526
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ther-King-Jr&p=4906531&viewfull=1#post4906531
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ther-King-Jr&p=4906778&viewfull=1#post4906778
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-YhPEFakvH.../tJpaNervV5c/s320/Hoover+&+Dorothy+Lamour.png
Even if you have Ron drinking the hippy juice; you have failed to implicate Rand the "aqua buddha". It is well known Rand Paul is married; what is your point.
I'm just refuting yet another one of your many lies:
Originally Posted by SabathMoon
I am not socially a libertarian, nor is Rand or Ron Paul.
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=5115846&viewfull=1#post5115846
Unlike Today's Tom Sawyers, I have presented classical liberalism as Libertarian. Unless you have a problem with Federic Bastiat, I doubt you find all forms of Libertarianism disagreeable.
If you want to make the case for sound economic policies using Libertarian doctrine, then do so, BUT, you can't borrow off of Judeo Christian doctrine because that would be 'stealing', and we all know how Libertarians feel about theft.