Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Had Donald Trump's cross dressing/transgenderism movement been illegal, then Dylan Redwine's father would have been getting therapy for his gender confusion, and most definitely would have been prohibited from having visitation rights of his children, i.e the murder would have never happened
Right, I already said I am for gender dysphoria being treated as a mental illness.
Should Dylan Redwine's cross dressing-diaper wearing-human feces eating father been given the option to seek treatment or through righteous laws been either given the option of treatment or the threat of incarceration?
Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
And people that have sexual desires for someone of the same sex and engage in those desires (the LGB of LGBT acronym)?
(Be careful once again glassjester, either you're going to go against God with your answer or your new bestest friend Art Brain).
I think that could also be considered a disorder. It is to sex what pika is to eating.
Except that pica isn't condemned by God nor does it (to my knowledge) cause HIV/AIDS and other nasty and often life threatening STD's.
Come to think of it, I doubt that pica eaters have an agenda that changes invaluable institutions and indoctrinates small children.
(And now a disclaimer so that glassjester will keep his LGBTQ buddies happy).
But then many heterosexual behaviors are disordered as well.
I would consider contraception, for example, to be the sexual equivalent of bulimia.
A husband and wife that make use of a device while having natural sex to prevent an unplanned pregnancy is hardly the equivalent to Bruce and what'shisname getting it on in a public restroom toilet stall.
Do we outlaw disorders? Well, no. But neither do we encourage them. We treat them.
Again, should that treatment be optional or required by law?
Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Can Ted Cruz be considered a follower of Christ because after fighting one helluva good fight against secular humanist Donald Trump in the Presidential primaries he reluctantly supported him so that he could continue to serve God as a US Senator and a potential Presidential candidate? I think so.
Can those who had no political aspirations to become President of the United States and in that role pursue a God-fearing agenda, but instead supported and continue to support LGBTQueer activist Donald Trump, can those people be considered followers of Christ?
Let's look to Scripture for the answer:
Isaiah 5:20 is a good start.
Your turn.
I said before that I voted for Trump because there was not a better, viable choice.
Again, promoting evil is not a viable choice. If you think that Donald Trump has some sort of God-fearing agenda that I've missed, then please share it.
I have asked you several times who I should have voted for instead. I am willing to hear you make the case for whomever you think I should have voted for. So go ahead. Who should it have been?
"None of the above, I REFUSE to betray God!"