You misunderstood then, and you misunderstand now.
There was no "misunderstanding you back then, we'll see if you've changed.
I realize it's because of your fervor, but that is off-putting to many. I look past it, because I DO see the egregious error in non-criminalized same-gender sexuality (I won't even use the term homosexual, because it legitimizes something that can't be legitimized; and it relegates true sexuality to having to include the hetero prefix).
The truth is not pretty to many, especially those who have loved ones or friends that proudly engage in this behavior. The thought of that person being held accountable for his crimes against nature doesn't appeal to many, even to those that call themselves "Christian".
I've never thought 2000 years of Judeo-Christian civilizations and cultures have had it wrong to criminalize same-gender sexuality. I just don't know how to get there from here now that the tide has long turned; so you also misunderstood my points regarding Theocracies.
Well then, here's your opportunity to explain yourself (save the $1.50 vocabulary and use words that your average Joe can understand) in regards to theocracies and how they have any connection to the recriminalization of sexual sins.
I don't know how more plain I can be. Your strength is also your weakness. You see everyone as a homosexualist (your terminology). My point then and now is that your methodologies aren't always effective, regardless of whether you're right about the subject matter and have relentless intentions for the good.
You haven't changed one bit: attack the messenger.
I don't care about all that. You're providing a ton a information for those who will listen and take a stand. I'm wanting to be more effective in taking a stand. It's as simple as that.
We'll see.
I'm here. I don't share your abrasive approach, but I agree with your premises. Sexual perversion is the very foundation of eroding everything Christian in modern western culture. And I consider standard fornication and adultery to be every bit as damaging as same-gender sexual deviance. Deviance is deviance.
While fornication and adultery are immoral, unlike homosexuality they're not perverse behaviors. That being said: As I've shown throughout this 4 part thread, homosexuality is the last nail in the proverbial coffin when it comes to destroying our once Judeo-Christian based nation. I talked about the sexual revolution, this is the last plank in it.
My sexually intimate relationship with my wife is free of lust and perverted sexual acts that emulate same-gender sexaul immorality. I don't condone and endorse sodomy and/or fellatio/cunnilingus by married couples.
I'd say I'm pretty far right on all this. There isn't any Leftist in me. I despise neo-liberalism.
TMI, Too much info.