So do those who engage in heterosex.
Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 4
- Thread starter aCultureWarrior
- Start date
- Status
glassjester
Well-known member
At the same rate?
Welcome to the WHMBR! Part 4 thread glassjester. Perhaps you could do me a favor and be a second set of eyes for me and let me know if you see in MrDante's latest post that CDC link I've been asking the homosexual activist in denial to produce?
glassjester
Well-known member
Exactly. MrDante was asked to supply a CDC link backing his statements. Where's the link?
Like all other STD's, MSM's (male sex with male) are disproportionately represented when it comes to contracting gonorrhea.
On that note:
Moving on...
Throughout this 4 Part thread I've talked quite a bit about the homosexual-pedophile-pederasty connection, as well as how the LGBTQueer movement has permeated every major institution in our society, including the Church.
A couple of times in the earlier threads I talked about homosexuality in the Catholic Church and how it was allowed due to the liberals inside of the Church.
The following link is disturbing, showing what these homosexuals and bisexuals did to innocent children (and in some cases women, but it must be shown.
It can also be found in page 1's index under "pedophilia/pederasty".
Database of Publicly Accused Priests in the United States
http://bishop-accountability.org/priestdb/PriestDBbylastName-A.html
A couple of times in the earlier threads I talked about homosexuality in the Catholic Church and how it was allowed due to the liberals inside of the Church.
The following link is disturbing, showing what these homosexuals and bisexuals did to innocent children (and in some cases women, but it must be shown.
It can also be found in page 1's index under "pedophilia/pederasty".
Database of Publicly Accused Priests in the United States
http://bishop-accountability.org/priestdb/PriestDBbylastName-A.html
It was in the post immediately following your post presenting all that evidence showing that Adolf Hitler and a large majority of his brutal SS were homosexuals.
Well according to the CDC that claim cannot be made: "However, most jurisdictions do not routinely report sex of sex partner or site of infection for gonorrhea cases, so trends in gonorrhea rates among MSM over time cannot be assessed."
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Welcome to the WHMBR! Part 4 thread glassjester. Perhaps you could do me a favor and be a second set of eyes for me and let me know if you see in MrDante's latest post that CDC link I've been asking the homosexual activist in denial to produce?
Feel free to check the index on page 1 for Scott Lively and Kevin Abram's "The Pink Swastika". The evidence was presented and discussed ad nauseum in a couple of earlier threads, along with other sources such as an openly homosexual writer stating it as well. The modern day LGBTQueer movement learned much from the gestapo, hence being referred to as the "gaystapo" by many.
Once you go through the well researched link, you can present anything that you feel isn't true and we can discuss it further.
Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Exactly. MrDante was asked to supply a CDC link backing his statements. Where's the link?
Like all other STD's, MSM's (male sex with male) are disproportionately represented when it comes to contracting gonorrhea.
On that note:
Moving on...
Amazing, absolutely amazing. The CDC records disproportionate amounts of HIV/AIDS, syphilis, anal cancer, tobacco use, alcohol abuse, recreational drug use, etc. etc. etc. amongst MSM, but can't do the same with gonorrhea?
The things that I learn from homosexual activists in denial.
Welcome to the WHMBR! Part 4 thread glassjester. Perhaps you could do me a favor and be a second set of eyes for me and let me know if you see in MrDante's latest post that CDC link I've been asking the homosexual activist in denial to produce?
Feel free to check the index on page 1 for Scott Lively and Kevin Abram's "The Pink Swastika". The evidence was presented and discussed ad nauseum in a couple of earlier threads, along with other sources such as an openly homosexual writer stating it as well. The modern day LGBTQueer movement learned much from the gestapo, hence being referred to as the "gaystapo" by many.
Once you go through the well researched link, you can present anything that you feel isn't true and we can discuss it further.
Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Exactly. MrDante was asked to supply a CDC link backing his statements. Where's the link?
Like all other STD's, MSM's (male sex with male) are disproportionately represented when it comes to contracting gonorrhea.
On that note:
Moving on...
Amazing, absolutely amazing. The CDC records disproportionate amounts of HIV/AIDS, syphilis, anal cancer, tobacco use, alcohol abuse, recreational drug use, etc. etc. etc. amongst MSM, but can't do the same with gonorrhea?
The things that I learn from homosexual activists in denial.
Are Lively and Abram the guys who claim that all the nazi concentration camps were staffed and run by Jews?
(Why do I waste my time on people like MrDante? I guess I a have a soft spot in my heart for the ignorant).
Since it appears that you have problems locating page 1's index, I'll link the website to "The Pink Swastika".
http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/books/pinkswastika/html/the_pinkswastika_4th_edition_-_final.htm
what's that to do with anything?
If you are reading and quoting a book like "Pink Swastika" then I would have to agree you do have a soft spot for the ignorant.
I'm still left wondering if Lively and Abram are to have us believe the Nazi concentration camps were staffed and run by Jews. (It's actually a more reasonable idea than the whole Hitler and the SS were all gay.
I Suppose I could have asked if Lively and Abram were flat-earthers but flat earthers have much better evidence to support their position.
glassjester
Well-known member
You equated the risk of STD between hetero- and homo- populations, with this exchange:
ACW: those who engage in homosex are prone to all kinds of nasty diseases.
Mr.D: so do those who engage in heterosex.
ACW was implying that homosexual activity is bad for society and a dangerous practice. Mr. D. was equating homosexual activity to heterosexual activity, thereby defending the practice.
But isn't that misleading?
Here's a similar (unfair) comparison:
Person A: Those who engage in drunk driving are prone to nasty car accidents.
Person B: So are those who engage in sober driving.
Person A is implying that drunk driving is bad for society and a dangerous practice. Person B is equating drunk driving to sober driving, thereby defending the practice.
Does Person B make a valid argument? Why/why not?
No, I was pointing out that unprotected sexual activity can result in any number of STD's no matter what sexual orientation of the participants.
“I am reminded of a colleague who reiterated "all my homosexual patients are quite sick" - to which I finally replied "so are all my heterosexual patients.” ― Ernest Van den Haag
Since you labeled the comparison "unfair" you already know it's not a valid argument
glassjester
Well-known member
Agreed. And among which population is the occurrence more frequent?
Similarly, Person B was pointing out that driving can result in a car accident no matter the BAC of the participants. Fair?
So which practice has proved more damaging?
Why would that matter?
glassjester
Well-known member
It matters because when you're determining whether a particular practice is a social good or a social ill, you have to consider not just whether it can cause damage, but also how likely it is to cause damage.
This is why driving is considered a social good (although it can cause damage), but drunk driving is considered a social ill (because it's much more likely to cause damage).
In theory, people can have sex without spreading disease - whether hetero or homo. Just like there are lots of people who drive perfectly well even when drunk! But most people are not likely to practice safe driving while practicing drunk driving.
Homosexuals can practice safe sex. Drunks can practice safe driving - but they don't.
So in actuality - which practice is more damaging?
Homosexuality or heterosexuality?
So you are saying that a higher rate of STD's among gays is an indication that gays are harmful to society. Does this work as a justification for discrimination?
glassjester
Well-known member
Discrimination in what way?
- Status