Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 4

[Arthur Brain]

We found out that some at TOL don't believe there's such a thing as spousal rape.

But surely that's only the nutters and not aCW?

:shocked:

 

[annabenedetti]

But surely that's only the nutters and not aCW?

:shocked:

Hmm....

Well, there's nutters - and then there's people like aCW who can find a lesbian in an acronym for Too Long; Didn't Read.

I think that puts him in a class all his own.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Hmm....

Well, there's nutters - and then there's people like aCW who can find a lesbian in an acronym for Too Long, Didn't Read.

I think that puts him in a class all his own.

One thing aCW cannot own is class...

 

[patrick jane]

My kids ran away and married each other

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Hmm, no such thing as statutory rape when a couple is married.

Correct. Pin that information to your wall for the next time you bring up your anal retentive obsession.

Well, let's set aside for the moment the fact that any sort of adult sexual relations with a 15 year old girl is rape whether under the guise of "marriage" or not and address this particular point you've brought up aCW.

Again: I'll gladly talk about Bill Clinton and the "Lolita Express", or how about Woody Allen having sex with his daughter who is now his wife? (yet another example of those "New York values" that Donald Trump embraces).

Adult-child sex is a huge problem here in the US. I've shown case after case after case where adult homosexual males have sex with underage boys (I've shown in some cases where adult female homosexuals prey on underage girls) and perverts like Bill Clinton and Woody Allen.

If you really want to talk about adult-child marriage, then Ill gladly talk about those filthy Muslim barbarians that marry little girls who should be playing with dolls instead of having sex with a dirty old man.

But since that doesn't involve Christian bashing, you really have no desire to discuss such things do you Art?

If a person forces themselves on their spouse against their will what is that if not rape? You think there's no such thing in a 'marital bed'?

lain:

Careful Art, you might strain yourself moving that goal post so often.

Sorry Art, but I'm not that loser who calls himself a Christian and then defends all kinds of immoral acts, including a husband raping his wife.

If you should ever visit the US you should come out to the Seattle area and join my wife and I in a church service. Amongst other things you'll hear our pastor talk about respecting your spouse. Marriage is a beautiful thing Art. it should never be defiled by acts of violence.

Since I doubt that you'll be doing that anytime soon, why don't you just turn on your television to a show called "Duck Dynasty". The patriarch of the family, a devout Christian named "Phil" just adores his wife.

Marriage is a beautiful thing, a Christian marriage is fantastic.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Correct. Pin that information to your wall for the next time you bring up your anal retentive obsession.

If there's anyone with an 'anal retentive obsession' around here it's you and your four year ongoing fixation with gay men. AFAIC anyone who forces or coerces sex is effectively guilty of rape, married or otherwise.

Again: I'll gladly talk about Bill Clinton and the "Lolita Express", or how about Woody Allen having sex with his daughter who is now his wife? (yet another example of those "New York values" that Donald Trump embraces).

Oh, I know you'll gladly talk about anyone who you're happy enough to slate because of your own agenda but when it comes to the likes of those you personally venerate? Silence.

Adult-child sex is a huge problem here in the US. I've shown case after case after case where adult homosexual males have sex with underage boys (I've shown in some cases where adult female homosexuals prey on underage girls) and perverts like Bill Clinton and Woody Allen.
If you really want to talk about adult-child marriage, then Ill gladly talk about those filthy Muslim barbarians that marry little girls who should be playing with dolls instead of having sex with a dirty old man.

If only you'd be consistent enough to include your personal heroes in such a critical manner when they come out with 'getting' 15 year old girls, not to mention derogatory and utterly demeaning remarks towards women in general.

But since that doesn't involve Christian bashing, you really have no desire to discuss such things do you Art?

Unlike you I'm consistent in condemning child rape all ends up no matter who does it or supports it, so you can put your martyr crown down Connie.

Careful Art, you might strain yourself moving that goal post so often.

Mine are fixed. Rape is rape, simple as.

Sorry Art, but I'm not that loser who calls himself a Christian and then defends all kinds of immoral acts, including a husband raping his wife.

Except when it comes to those who promote getting 15 year old girls then sure...

If you should ever visit the US you should come out to the Seattle area and join my wife and I in a church service. Amongst other things you'll hear our pastor talk about respecting your spouse. Marriage is a beautiful thing Art. it should never be defiled by acts of violence.

It should be, but unfortunately it isn't always the case.

Since I doubt that you'll be doing that anytime soon, why don't you just turn on your television to a show called "Duck Dynasty". The patriarch of the family, a devout Christian named "Phil" just adores his wife.

Marriage is a beautiful thing, a Christian marriage is fantastic.

No thanks, I've no time for anyone who advocates for child brides, is demeaning towards women in general or for insipid sleazy douches who give a pass for that sort of thing either.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Correct. Pin that information [that statutory rape doesn't apply to married couples] to your wall for the next time you bring up your anal retentive obsession.

If there's anyone with an 'anal retentive obsession' around here it's you and your four year ongoing fixation with gay men.

While the indoctrination and physical molestation of children by the LGBTQ movement has been one thing I have focused on throughout this 4 part thread, I do try to show all of the participants of the LGBTQ movement (lesbians, transvestites, etc.) and their 'culture' (pornography, exhibitionism, promiscuity, Christian bashing, etc. etc.).

AFAIC anyone who forces or coerces sex is effectively guilty of rape, married or otherwise.

How about all of those homosexual males that "groom" their underage boy toys? HRC founder/pederast Terry Bean and former San Fransicko Board of Supervisors member Harvey Milk didn't force or coerce any of their underage conquests, they "groomed" them.

From page 1's index:

The grooming process of a child sexual predator
https://www.families.com/blog/the-grooming-process-of-a-child-sexual-predator

How pedophiles groom our children and us
http://www.renegadepopo.com/how-pedophiles-groom--printer-version.php

Aside from individual "grooming" the LGBTQueer movement "grooms" children to accept homosexuality, transgenderism/transvestitism, etc. etc. etc. as something normal.


Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Again: I'll gladly talk about Bill Clinton and the "Lolita Express", or how about Woody Allen having sex with his daughter who is now his wife? (yet another example of those "New York values" that Donald Trump embraces).

Oh, I know you'll gladly talk about anyone who you're happy enough to slate because of your own agenda but when it comes to the likes of those you personally venerate? Silence.

A child molester is a child molester Art. But as I mentioned below: It just aint no fun for you if there is no Christian bashing involved.

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Adult-child sex is a huge problem here in the US. I've shown case after case after case where adult homosexual males have sex with underage boys (I've shown in some cases where adult female homosexuals prey on underage girls) and perverts like Bill Clinton and Woody Allen.
If you really want to talk about adult-child marriage, then Ill gladly talk about those filthy Muslim barbarians that marry little girls who should be playing with dolls instead of having sex with a dirty old man.

If only you'd be consistent enough to include your personal heroes in such a critical manner when they come out with 'getting' 15 year old girls, not to mention derogatory and utterly demeaning remarks towards women in general.

How about we talk about this child molester who belongs to a religion that openly embraces the physical molestation of children?

Go easy on your condemnation Art, as the filthy child molesting barbarians that practice the false religion of Islam are also known for being extremely violent.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

In "New York values thug" news:

Trump Vows to Stand by Campaign Manager Charged With Battery, Says He Does Not Discard People

March 30, 2016

Donald Trump says he is considering legal action in response to a recent battery charge against campaign manager Corey Lewandowski.

"Frankly, this is not a claim that should have been made," Trump told ABC News' David Muir on "Good Morning America" this morning.

Lewandowski was arrested on Tuesday morning for allegedly grabbing former Breitbart reporter Michelle Fields following a Trump event earlier this month. Trump dismissed the incident as "very minor," saying that "practically nothing happened."...

Fields first spoke about the alleged incident in an op-ed published earlier this month. Fields alleges she was assaulted at Trump’s news conference on March 8, the night of the Michigan, Mississippi and Idaho Republican primaries, after posing a question to the New York real estate mogul.

“Trump acknowledged the question, but before he could answer I was jolted backwards. Someone had grabbed me tightly by the arm and yanked me down. I almost fell to the ground, but was able to maintain my balance. Nonetheless, I was shaken,” Fields wrote...

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/dona...ion-charge-campaign-manager/story?id=38024496


So Donald: Are you going to "stand by" your campaign manager kinda like you stood by your first two wives? How about your pledge to standby the Republican Party even if you're not it's nominee, which you've now gone back on? (Commitment isn't Donnie's forte').

You must know more than a few New Yorkers Donnie that can take care of business and 'persuade' the victim to drop charges? And certainly you're not going to let a prosecutor push around someone as important as you are ya Donnie?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I would catch the wrath of the LGBTQueer crowd if I didn't share a huge part of 'gay' culture (showing their hatred of Jesus) by showing an excerpt from this years "Hunky Jesus Contest".


WARNING! As with everything associated with homosexuality...

I ask this question every year and still haven't seen it happen:

When can we expect the cross dressing/child molesting/disease ridden Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence to do a

"Hunky Mohammad Contest"?

Surely the thought of being beaten to a pulp and possibly beheaded for mocking the pedophile prophet Mohammad wouldn't keep the trannies from mocking him?

Wait: You don't suppose the pedophiles of the LGBTQueer movement feel uncomfortable mocking the pedophiles of Islam?

 

[Arthur Brain]

While the indoctrination and physical molestation of children by the LGBTQ movement has been one thing I have focused on throughout this 4 part thread, I do try to show all of the participants of the LGBTQ movement (lesbians, transvestites, etc.) and their 'culture' (pornography, exhibitionism, promiscuity, Christian bashing, etc. etc.).

Oh of course you have aCW, and in such an unabashedly and enviably objective manner as well. In no way at all have you used misinformation or propaganda to bolster your nutty obsession thread.

How about all of those homosexual males that "groom" their underage boy toys? HRC founder/pederast Terry Bean and former San Fransicko Board of Supervisors member Harvey Milk didn't force or coerce any of their underage conquests, they "groomed" them.

Not sure how many times I have to repeat the same in order for it to eventually sink in to whatever resides within your skull aCW.

I have zero tolerance for rape no matter what.
Zero tolerance have I for rape regardless of who's committing it or advocates it.

Do I need to draw a chart on this for you or something?

A child molester is a child molester Art. But as I mentioned below: It just aint no fun for you if there is no Christian bashing involved.

Still with the martyr thing going on there eh? Look dude, pointing out how much of a crank you happen to be along with your accompanying double standards and associated idiocy isn't 'Christian bashing'.

If you really want to talk about adult-child marriage, then Ill gladly talk about those filthy Muslim barbarians that marry little girls who should be playing with dolls instead of having sex with a dirty old man.

Case in point. You're all eager to talk about Muslims but not those of your own 'brethren' who publicly advocate child brides etc themselves. Why won't you gladly address Phil Robertson's remarks?

How about we talk about this child molester who belongs to a religion that openly embraces the physical molestation of children?

You get around to criticizing your 'hero' first and let's, otherwise it would seem that you give a pass to one and not the other and that doesn't fly with me.

Go easy on your condemnation Art, as the filthy child molesting barbarians that practice the false religion of Islam are also known for being extremely violent.

Yes aCW. I'm in quaking terror whenever I pass by the local mosque which is about 100 yards away...

lain:

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior

While the indoctrination and physical molestation of children by the LGBTQ movement has been one thing I have focused on throughout this 4 part thread, I do try to show all of the participants of the LGBTQ movement (lesbians, transvestites, etc.) and their 'culture' (pornography, exhibitionism, promiscuity, Christian bashing, etc. etc.).

Oh of course you have aCW, and in such an unabashedly and enviably objective manner as well. In no way at all have you used misinformation or propaganda to bolster your nutty obsession thread.

Need I show your recent posts where you refused to denounce homosexuality, the disease that is associated with it (HIV/AIDS), a cross dressing man using a women's restroom and even threw in some good ole Christian bashing to a 8 year old girl Art?


Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
How about all of those homosexual males that "groom" their underage boy toys? HRC founder/pederast Terry Bean and former San Fransicko Board of Supervisors member Harvey Milk didn't force or coerce any of their underage conquests, they "groomed" them.

Not sure how many times I have to repeat the same in order for it to eventually sink in to whatever resides within your skull aCW.

I have zero tolerance for rape no matter what.
Zero tolerance have I for rape regardless of who's committing it or advocates it.

Do I need to draw a chart on this for you or something?

The "chart" that you drew in your previous post looked like this:

AFAIC anyone who forces or coerces sex is effectively guilty of rape, married or otherwise.

i.e. nothing about grooming, which the vast majority of pedophiles/pederasts do.

Let's review that filthy promoter of pedophilia's letter to the editor and see if there was any mention of "force" or "coercion" in his (Peter Tatchell's) letter.

No mention of "force" or "coercion" Art, just the "great joy" that 9-13 year old children often times have when they're raped by the likes of homosexual activist Peter Tatchell and his homosexual and heterosexual friends.

 

[patrick jane]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
How about all of those homosexual males that "groom" their underage boy toys? HRC founder/pederast Terry Bean and former San Fransicko Board of Supervisors member Harvey Milk didn't force or coerce any of their underage conquests, they "groomed" them.



The "chart" that you drew in your previous post looked like this:



i.e. nothing about grooming, which the vast majority of pedophiles/pederasts do.

Let's review that filthy promoter of pedophilia's letter to the editor and see if there was any mention of "force" or "coercion" in his (Peter Tatchell's) letter.

No mention of "force" or "coercion" Art, just the "great joy" that 9-13 year old children often times have when they're raped by the likes of homosexual activist Peter Tatchell and his homosexual and heterosexual friends.

But people like Terry Bean, Harvey Milk and Peter Tatchell have no influence and don't hold positions of importance.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

But people like Terry Bean, Harvey Milk and Peter Tatchell have no influence and don't hold positions of importance.

I see that your candidate (the one you called "a joke"), made himself look foolish yet again.

Donald Trump's 3 positions on abortion in 3 hours

March 31, 2019

(CNN) — Donald Trump sought to clarify, walk back, then seemingly reverse his position on punishing women who seek abortion procedures -- should they be legally banned -- over the course of a few hours Wednesday.

Here's what he said about it in just one day:

'Some form of punishment'

The GOP presidential front-runner's mad scramble began a little after he told MSNBC's Chris Matthews that abortion, if outlawed, should carry "some form of punishment."

When Matthews asked if that penalty should apply specifically to the woman, Trump replied: "Yes."

But he didn't elaborate on its nature except to say that men should not be held responsible.

READ: Trump struggles to clarify abortion remarks

The backlash was fast, angry and bipartisan.

Dawn Laguens from the Planned Parenthood Action Fund called Trump "flat-out dangerous," while Bernie Sanders ("Shameful") and Hillary Clinton ("Horrific and telling") tweeted their condemnations.

On the GOP side, John Kasich and Ted Cruz, who both favor strict anti-abortion laws, criticized Trump from the right, with the Texas senator accusing him of having damaged the cause, saying the billionaire "demonstrated that he hasn't seriously thought through the issues."


'This issue is unclear'

Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks sent in a statement from Trump to reporters: "This issue is unclear and should be put back into the states for determination. Like Ronald Reagan, I am pro-life with exceptions, which I have outlined numerous times."

Criticism, though, continued to come.

'The woman is a victim'

By a little before 5 p.m., Trump released another explanation -- marking an almost complete about-face.

"If Congress were to pass legislation making abortion illegal and the federal courts upheld this legislation, or any state were permitted to ban abortion under state and federal law, the doctor or any other person performing this illegal act upon a woman would be held legally responsible, not the woman," Trump said in a statement.

"The woman is a victim in this case as is the life in her womb," Trump said. "My position has not changed -- like Ronald Reagan, I am pro-life with exceptions."
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/30/politics/donald-trump-abortion-positions/index.html

Should we start calling Donald Trump "Cracker Jack Donald"? (Like the prize you use to find in a Cracker Jack box, you never know what you're going to get with Donald Trump).

Uh huh.

 

[patrick jane]

Trump was duped

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Trump was duped

3 different stances on abortion in one day 3 hours. How was Donald Trump "duped"?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Let's see what the Boy Scouts of America Boy Sodomizers of America have been up to since they allowed 'gay' youth to become scouts and openly proud and unrepentant homosexual adults to become Scout Masters:

Missouri Supreme Court: Boy Scouts not liable for abuse

The Missouri Supreme Court ruled March 15 that Boy Scouts of America can't be held liable in a case of alleged child sexual abuse by a scoutmaster, a ruling the victim's attorney said could make it challenging to hold organizations accountable for abuse by employees.

March 22, 2016

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo.
The Missouri Supreme Court ruled March 15 that Boy Scouts of America can't be held liable in a case of alleged child sexual abuse by a scoutmaster, a ruling the victim's attorney said could make it challenging to hold organizations accountable for abuse by employees.

In the ruling, the judges said state law only allows for lawsuits against perpetrators of abuse, not corporations or associations.

"It's going to be more difficult to hold non-perpetrators liable for the actions of their agents and employees," said Randall Rhodes, the lawyer for the now-35-year-old man who sued.

Boy Scouts attorney Gerard Noce did not immediately respond to an Associated Press request for comment March 15.

The man, identified in court documents only as John Doe, said the national Boy Scouts association and a local chapter were negligent and partly responsible for alleged abuse by a scoutmaster. He said the abuse, including battery, started when he was about 12 years old in 1992 and stretched until 1997.

Read more: http://www.waynesvilledailyguide.com/article/20160322/NEWS/160329673

It's interesting how the old Boy Scouts of America, an organization that prohibited homosexuals into their ranks (yet as with any youth mentor organization, was invaded by homosexual predators) was liable for the homosexual child molesters that slipped under the radar, yet the new Boy Scouts of America Boy Sodomizers of America aren't liable even though they knowingly hire men who have very likely been abused as children and engage in same sex perversion.

 

[Rusha]

Trump was duped

How in the world was he *duped*? A person's stance on abortion (IF one genuinely sees it as the killing of an unborn baby), does not change drastically over a few years and especially in the matter of three hours. It's quite clear from Trump's stances over the years as well his comments about PP that Trump is pro-abortion. He is using the blood of the innocent (unborn babies) as a bargaining chip to satisfy his over inflated, ego-driven desire to become the next POTUS.

 

[patrick jane]

How in the world was he *duped*? A person's stance on abortion (IF one genuinely sees it as the killing of an unborn baby), does not change drastically over a few years and especially in the matter of three hours. It's quite clear from Trump's stances over the years as well his comments about PP that Trump is pro-abortion. He is using the blood of the innocent (unborn babies) as a bargaining chip to satisfy his over inflated, ego-driven desire to become the next POTUS.

It was a loaded question from Chris Matthews, a hypothetical. Trump is Pro Life now and runs on the Pro Life platform. He has said he will place a conservative SC judge. He would be better than Clinton. I was once pro choice 30 years ago, people mature and change the way they view life and the unborn lives.

 

[Rusha]

It was a loaded question from Chris Matthews, a hypothetical. Trump is Pro Life now and runs on the Pro Life platform.

When it comes to electing the POTUS, there are no *loaded questions*. Abortion is a fairly simple topic ... you are either for protecting the life of the unborn ... OR you are not. I do not buy that someone such as Trump who was so recently pro-abortion is suddenly concerned about protecting the unborn. He can't even make up his mind insofar as who should be punished for abortions.

There are simple questions that I could have answered as a teen. Anyone who is truly against abortion knows WHY they are against abortion, who is responsible and who should be punished.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

It was a loaded question from Chris Matthews, a hypothetical. Trump is Pro Life now and runs on the Pro Life platform.

Which political party platform states that women who have an abortion should be punished?