Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
By attempting to justify adult-child sex in his letter to the editor, leading UK homosexual activist Peter Tatchell encouraged others to have sex with children. The harm that he’s brought to countless innocent children because of his words is immeasurable.
(As if Tatchell’s letter to the editor defending pedophilia wasn’t convincing enough.)
Peter Tatchell – Sex Brought ‘Great Joy’. To 9 Year Olds
Posted on March 12, 2014 by Matthew Hopkins
Matthew Hopkins reveals Peter Tatchell’s association with PIE members, his written assertions that paedophile abuse brought 9-year olds ‘great joy’ and exposes other misguided advocates of reducing the age of consent.
Peter Tatchell is a supposedly respectable, establishment figure. A man at the heart of the campaign to lower the gay age of consent from 18 to 16 he was a Labour Parliamentary candidate and official, currently has his own section of the Guardian website, and describes himself on his website as the Green Party spokesman on Human Rights.
The reality is that Tatchell contributed a chapter to a book compiled by members of the sinister Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) – a book with the sole and stated goal of abolishing the age of consent entirely, making children, toddlers and babes in arms fair game for paedophiles of all ages. Even today Tatchell advocates reducing the age of consent, albeit now just to 14.
The book, ‘The Betrayal Of Youth’ (BOY for short) was put together by convicted paedophile Warren Middleton (aka John Parratt), former vice-chairperson of PIE and published in 1986, only three years after Peter Tatchell stood as the Labour Party Parliamentary candidate for Bermondsey.
Tatchell often makes vague statements to the effect that the BNP ‘fabricated’, ‘smears’ against him. It does appear that the BNP or its supporters forged an image of Tatchell holding a PIE sign.
So on the advice of Louise Mensch your humble inquisitor accessed a number of archives including a personal visit to the British Library to be allowed access to the original copy of Tatchell’s book held there. Because the book consists only of text it is neither illegal for the library to possess a copy nor for members of the public to view it.
Fortunately the responsible British Library authorities have ensured that the vile tome is held in the vaults and tied with a security band to prevent it being viewed by accident. Readers are required to view the book under supervised conditions at the restricted desks marked in red.
Having obtained the copy, the author carefully checked the claims against Tatchell. Contrary to his protestations, it seems that Tatchell was indeed a contributor to the book, BOY and the allegations about it are broadly true.
Read more:
http://matthewhopkinsnews.com/?p=436
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Is the person who incites a riot where lives are lost and property destroyed not guilty because he didn't physically hurt anyone or destroy property?
You mean when I say things like ‘homosexuals should be stoned to death’?
Oh wait, I’m the one that wants to help sexually confused people through therapy (nice try Al).
Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
The purpose of this ‘exercise’ is to show the activism of your average defender of homosexuality. I’ve named several icons in the LGBTQ movement that openly promoted adult-child sex, yet no one (Art Brain, you, annateddenetti, or Sandy) have come forward to vigorously condemn them (instead, the same ole song is dance is played: ‘But Phil Robertson wants to lower the age of consent as well!’)
No confusion here Al; you’re the guy who throughout this 4 part thread has adamantly defended the leading homosexual activist in the UK (Peter Tatchell) for promoting lowering age of sexual consent laws and pedophilia.
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Then you'll step forward and denounce all of the major LGBTQ movement 'icons' (Harry Hay, Frank Kameny, David Thorstadt, Harvey Milk, Peter Tatchell, etc. etc. etc.) as filthy disgusting child molesting perverts that want to lower and eventually abolish age of sexual consent laws.
Say it Al.
Say it Al.
It’s been pointed out numerous times how the leading ‘icons’ of the LGBTQ movement felt about adult-child sex, yet you and others in the LGBTQ movement still refuse to denounce them.
That being said: If only a proud and unrepentant homosexual would step forward and prove me wrong by stating when asked by a child if his or her behavior and lifestyle is immoral, the response would be “Yes, very much so.”
Care to discuss Linda Harvey’s “12 WAYS HOMOSEXUAL ADULTS ENDANGER CHILDREN”?
http://barbwire.com/2014/06/04/twelve-ways-homosexual-adults-endanger-children/
Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Remember what we talked about throughout this 4 part thread Al?
Sinners won’t openly condemn another’s sin, i.e. the shoplifter won’t condemn the burglar just as the homosexual won’t condemn the child molester, because they’re all involved in sinful behavior and if you start judging other sins, then that opens the door to judge yours.
Still defending UK leading homosexual activist and promoter of pedophilia Peter “the pedophile” Tatchell I see.
If homosexuals/child molesters can write their own moral code, why can’t shoplifters and burglars? I'll guarantee you that a lot more lives have been lost through homosexuality than through shoplifting and burglaries.
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
So we can put it on record that you're in favor of the legalization of prostitution, adult incest, polygamy and a wide array of other perversions as long as it involves adults and is consensual?
Ohhhhhh, so you can be quoted as saying people have every supposed ‘right’ to destroy their own lives but if there are victims to their actions, then their behavior should be illegal?
So many rules for someone that at one time firmly believed in what consenting people/adults (depending on the post, Al sometimes didn’t require adulthood) do should be of no one else’s concern.
lain: 
