Who Here Chose To Be Heterosexual?
- Thread starter Arthur Brain
- Start date
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well that rather lends credence to the notion that people don't choose to be homosexuals as why would anyone choose to be such in a society that would treat them like that?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
No.
See what I mean? Irritable.
With trolling and immaturity? Certainly. If you wanna debate like an adult then let me know. Otherwise you can conjecture as much as you will, it won't change anything.
Perhaps...perhaps not.
But don't dodge the issue by changing the focus upon me. I've no pious dogma which dictates self-righteously condemning/segregating a specific segment of society...you've, on the other hand, somehow proudly absorbed such mindless ideology.
What factors within your life have nurtured such ignorance?
musterion
Well-known member
No, you're irritable when anyone questions or criticizes homosexuality. Always have been. Irritable, in fact, to near the point of seeming defensiveness. You and Auntie Grantie both. Every time. Hence...
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
No, you're irritable when anyone questions or criticizes homosexuality. Always have been. Irritable, in fact, to near the point of seeming defensiveness. You and Auntie Grantie both. Every time. Hence...
Oh boy, now the 'Auntie' epithet. Are you related to aCW by any chance? He's just as much of a crank where it comes to making out folk are gay if they don't ascribe to his 'ideology' on his three year personal blog.
Look dude, I'll tell you what I tell him. If I was homosexual I'd have no qualms in admitting it. Why would I or anyone else? It's not like there's a threat anymore for people out of the closet and recognizing that as a positive thing doesn't make one gay by association.
If you're going to be in any way consistent then would you apply the same level of 'uncertainty' to those who are fixated on the topic - like aCW? A guy who spends little time talking about anything else, who's been banned for lurid innuendo on more than one occasion and who isn't above posting unnecessarily graphic content on his own pet project? Somehow I think not.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
musterion
Well-known member
No problem, Meshak.
:thumb:
:darwinsm:
:darwinsm:
is that what you say to your boyfriend?
blessings
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
It does make clear one thing, they disappeared, for sure! :noway:
I remember old women would shudder more at the subject, not mentioned, than over a murder.
They hitched a ride to the coast........... remember Dan White? It seems like yesterday to me.
It is so hard for anyone to understand how much time effects ones attitude, especially today! Not to say they are missing out on insight, rather they are missing the point of view, in flux.
They fail to see how the measure of personal relevance changes with time.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well, they wouldn't have disappeared, they'd have just been forced to hide such for fear of repercussions and probably forced to live a lie to cover it up. They'd still be there and likely in unhappy relationships/marriages where the women in such weren't exactly getting the best deal either when you think about it.
If homosexuality causes more consternation among folk than murder then I'd say society has progressed for the better as that's no longer the case. It wasn't that far back where black people weren't allowed in cinemas and where women and children practically had no rights or a voice at all. Things change with time and perhaps not always for the better but more so than not I would say.
tardlyartie makes the argument for societal acceptance of pedophilia:
"I agree"
This may be true, and this is up to you, far more than me. I am yesterdays papers, and have sense enough to know it.
What ASC does not get is what I have said here; my generation took a stand, which seems extreme today, and since this is the case, there is but two choices, to leave it be, or become an infamous anachronism.
The issue, with people of colour, for me, in my time and in my understanding cannot and shall not ever be compared, or made a template for this issue. The twain shall not meet; we were held to racialist thinking, which was lifted by what appeared in our own lives everyday, and all common sense, such racialism was no more than a caste system, where the advantage became something imagined by the few, yet perpetuated into the consciousness of the many, until the many threw off the shackles, as worthless, and repressive as they had became to all of us, no matter what colour we are.
I think the question is who here chooses to be gay. We are born heterosexual.
genuineoriginal
New member
Of course you do.
You have been self-righteously condemning Christians and Christian beliefs for many years.
Hypocrite.
"Must" according to who? How fragile do you think kids are? Or put another way, just how delicate a balance do you think human sexuality really is?
You guys should get a new hobby. Seriously.