Who Here Chose To Be Heterosexual?

[Arthur Brain]

I am suggesting that people learn their "sexual orientation" in a similar way that they learn their native language, through observation and interaction with their environment during their formative years.

This would typically lead to a heterosexual orientation, especially when considering the biological imperative to procreate, but will sometimes lead to asexual, bisexual, homosexual, or fetish orientations in instances of mismatched environmental and biological stimuli.

Well that's one take on it. I don't believe mine came about through such as it wouldn't have even meant anything at such a young age. I saw girls differently to boys before I was five and the 'language' comparison still doesn't work. That's something that has to be taught and subsequently learnt in order to communicate - and that takes time.

To use another analogy. Say someone is born with a prodigious talent. That would require learning a subject before the fruits of such could come to fruition, but one is still born with it.

 

[musterion]

Or there's less of an "ick" factor from some of you when it comes to gay women, which just demonstrates how completely ridiculous all of this is.

No, it's just as "ick."

 

[Granite]

You are claiming that you never even saw a man and a woman kissing while you were growing up?
Not even once?

And if you'd seen a gay couple necking when you were a kid that would've turned you gay?

 

[quip]

I am suggesting that people learn their "sexual orientation" in a similar way that they learn their native language, through observation and interaction with their environment during their formative years.

This would typically lead to a heterosexual orientation, especially when considering the biological imperative to procreate, but will sometimes lead to asexual, bisexual, homosexual, or fetish orientations in instances of mismatched environmental and biological stimuli.

So?

A better question is to ask yourself how you culturally developed the self-righteous predisposition to judge other's sexual orientation.

Just take stringent measures to study upon yourself before obsessing upon the traits of others...and we'll all be better off for it.

 

[quip]

And if you'd seen a gay couple necking when you were a kid that would've turned you gay?

Yeah, it is a rather simplistic notion....for simplistic minds, no less.

 

[genuineoriginal]

Well that's one take on it. I don't believe mine came about through such as it wouldn't have even meant anything at such a young age. I saw girls differently to boys before I was five and the 'language' comparison still doesn't work.

Most five year olds can talk quite well.

That's something that has to be taught and subsequently learnt in order to communicate - and that takes time.

Like reading and writing, as opposed to hearing and speaking?

To use another analogy. Say someone is born with a prodigious talent. That would require learning a subject before the fruits of such could come to fruition, but one is still born with it.

So, it is like the prodigious talent of learning a primary language?

 

[genuineoriginal]

And if you'd seen a gay couple necking when you were a kid that would've turned you gay?

It must be considered as a factor in the development of the abnormal sexual response known as homosexuality.

 

[Angel4Truth]

Or there's less of an "ick" factor from some of you when it comes to gay women, which just demonstrates how completely ridiculous all of this is.

No, its just as disgusting and wrong.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Most five year olds can talk quite well.

They still haven't come close to mastering a language at that age generally speaking.

Like reading and writing, as opposed to hearing and speaking?

Both inform learning how to communicate in given language.

So, it is like the prodigious talent of learning a primary language?

No, not at all. Most people have the capacity to learn, not everyone is born with a prodigious talent but the point of the analogy still holds. It's innate.

 

[musterion]

Granite and Arthur,

Are you homos? I don't mean together; every time there's a thread on this topic, you two are noticeably irritable.

Serious question.

You queer?

 

[genuineoriginal]

A better question is to ask yourself how you culturally developed the self-righteous predisposition to judge other's sexual orientation.

You culturally developed your self-righteous predisposition to judge others according to political correctness through repeated exposure to a bunch of lies.

 

[genuineoriginal]

No, not at all. Most people have the capacity to learn, not everyone is born with a prodigious talent but the point of the analogy still holds. It's innate.

You appear to be claiming that learning to be a homosexual requires a person to be born with a prodigious talent for something, perversion perhaps?

 

[Totton Linnet]

Nobody would choose hell, but they do choose to pervert nature as God created it...it is like a hate crime against God.

 

[Arthur Brain]

You appear to be claiming that learning to be a homosexual requires a person to be born with a prodigious talent for something, perversion perhaps?

:liberals:

I've no idea how you've arrived at that conclusion. I didn't say anything resembling that.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Granite and Arthur,

Are you homos? I don't mean together; every time there's a thread on this topic, you two are noticeably irritable.

Serious question.

You queer?

Considering I've stated my orientation on this thread alone it's hard not to see this as anything other than trolling. What you call irritable I'd call blunt. In case it's somehow still not clear then no, I'm not homosexual. I'm straight, I like women etc...all cleared up now? Jolly good. Doubtless Granite will inform you of the same in "irritable" fashion.

lain:

 

[musterion]

 

[Arthur Brain]

So trolling it was then. Thanks for clearing that up.

 

[Ktoyou]

Furthermore, how could you *choose* to be homosexual if you're straight?

I remember mama, saying, “Do not choose boys impulsively, or for prurient desire, rather bid your time to reflect on the finality of commitment.”

I choose when the time was right!

In those days, no one choose to be homosexuals, as such choosing would lead to total ostracism, being consider a debouched creature, infected with concupiscence, and would render one vulnerable to acts deleterious to ones' person

 

[musterion]

Nope. I was dead serious. Still am.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Nope. I was dead serious. Still am.

So was I. I could imply the same about you if I wanted to but I'm not into trolling so please take that sad act somewhere else.