The Wrap
on Politics
After noting the historic fall of Trump's popularity below the 50% approval rating in a scant eight days...
While elsewhere, Cruc was busy extending alternative facts to include the definitional...
And on hiding behind walls, one way or another...
On Franklin's security/liberty quote...
Noted with some disappointment the ongoing nature of zealots in triumph...
And that Dick Cheney had actually weighed in on the "Musilm ban" question...
Considered a question from my son...
While in the war on personal responsibility, the unconscientious deflectors were up in arms (like schizophrenics again, apparently and way to go Congress)...
And on criticism relating to a recent military action...
And after some complained about a dour photo of Bannon on Time, I met the question different media treatment with...
Tomorrow? Alt Facts, political hacks and somebody cries "Hitler!" :noid: Okay, so that was me, but wait and see if you don't argree.
on Politics
After noting the historic fall of Trump's popularity below the 50% approval rating in a scant eight days...
Man, when you really think about that it's, well, unrelated. lain:A new Quinnipiac poll released last week shows more American voters support President Trump's executive order to temporarily suspend immigration from several Middle Eastern and North African countries.
Like someone saying, "Hey, most of us on the block want Bill to move!" and another guy says, "Yeah, well most of us like his dog."
Meaning that if the remaining 10 percent wake up we can look more like our ideas and less like irrationally frightened people willing to make Franklin roll in his grave.By a margin of 48 percent to 42 percent, voters supported "suspending immigration from terror prone regions, even if it means turning away refugees."
Right. That something is your thinking, given 48% of the people could love him and that would still leave a popularity rating under 50%.Something doesn't quite match here
While elsewhere, Cruc was busy extending alternative facts to include the definitional...
Once you reserve the right to declare reality and refuse its recognition, whatever follows is unintelligible. I cannot rely on what I read to inform me of your meaning.There's no such thing as poverty in America, unless they are the homeless. I refuse to go by what the 1st World calls 'poverty'- how many ways can a society make itself look spoiled
My Webster's? I don't even own stock, though I put a good bit of stock in it, as should anyone who speaks the language.Poverty is a difficult word to define, and your Websters probably has the worst definition there is to it.
Rather, poverty can cover a poetic range, including spirit, but the inability to provide subsistence is the ground floor for assistance in terms of the subject at hand that I spoke to, public charity.Poverty is much better defined as 'a condition in which the basic needs of food, clothing, and shelter are not met'. But, it can also include illness, no income, no education, and so on.
But who can know what you mean or if you even do?:chuckle: You're all fools
And on hiding behind walls, one way or another...
I not only consider it, I've noted it often enough in relation to the slave trade. But the feelings of those men don't alter the underlying truth of the matter I noted a moment ago, that we are a nation of immigrants, enlivened, expanded and founded by them. Closing ranks in fear of the other is beneath us....perhaps you haven't considered that not all the founding fathers agreed on all matters.
On Franklin's security/liberty quote...
He declared a principle, one that is applicable to the moment. And I wed that application to a foundational truth, that we are a nation founded on the thing so many have chosen to hold in contempt or fear.Franklin was not referring to the loss of liberty of non citizens.
We hold these truths self-evident, that the citizens of our land are endowed...no, wait, that's not how it goes, is it.No citizen has lost any liberty in the issuing of the executive orders.
Noted with some disappointment the ongoing nature of zealots in triumph...
I am truly sorry for many of my friends on the right...some people just aren't happy unless they're miserable and making others like them. Give them power and they want compliance. Give them compliance and they want agreement. Give them agreement and they want to be loved for it. One need following another until the impossible is reached and they can begin the war that resembles in their distortions, love.
And that Dick Cheney had actually weighed in on the "Musilm ban" question...
This Just In:
Dick Cheney says Trump's action, "goes against everything we stand for and believe in."
Do you realize how off base you have to be for Dick Cheney to side with the left? lain:
Considered a question from my son...
Tonight as my son was falling asleep he asked, "Why do people talk and cats meow?"
It's a fair question.
I told him, "Because people have to learn to tell the truth."
While in the war on personal responsibility, the unconscientious deflectors were up in arms (like schizophrenics again, apparently and way to go Congress)...
If you want to turn him into a dry satirist I can't stop you framing it in the way to best shield him from his own rhetoric, but there's little in his rhetorical practice over the years to shore that up... I think he says whatever he thinks in the moment and given the moment whatever he thinks may not be the same thing as another moment. I suspect he feels and hunches his way through a lot of it and that can be okay for an investor who bears the consequence of a wrong call, but is less desirable in a president who passes the fruit of his errors to the people with their fingers crossed.That's not quite what he's doing there though. He's [Trump] ridiculing the system. While he was running to be in charge of it.
And on criticism relating to a recent military action...
He gets the briefing and makes the call...just out of personal curiosity, at some point is Trump going to be responsible for what he says or does or will that personal attachment only find him if a thing works out? lain:I had no idea POTUS was in hands on control of the nuts and bolts of every operation.
Don't they have people in the Military in charge of Military stuff?
And after some complained about a dour photo of Bannon on Time, I met the question different media treatment with...
Let's look at the preeminent conservative magazine for a bit of illumination on mature treatment:
View attachment 25248 View attachment 25249 View attachment 25250 View attachment 25251 View attachment 25255
Just a few and he's the actual president then, not a cabinet appointee. I'm sure they mostly passed on the lower down the totem pole sort...
View attachment 25252 View attachment 25253 View attachment 25254
Well, I'm sure they were as juvenile and hard on their own.
View attachment 25256
Or maybe not. lain:
Tomorrow? Alt Facts, political hacks and somebody cries "Hitler!" :noid: Okay, so that was me, but wait and see if you don't argree.