gcthomas
New member
I've taught young children who would would have considered that a clever comment. Maybe they would have judged your intellect spot on: clever for a ten year old.
Top physicist on climate change....
- Thread starter Nathon Detroit
- Start date
I've taught young children who would would have considered that a clever comment. Maybe they would have judged your intellect spot on: clever for a ten year old.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Lord help us.
Once again, climatologists are proven idiots, and global warming is proven to be nothing more than a hoax:
"In a paper published in the Journal of Glaciology on Friday, researchers from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, the University of Maryland in College Park, and the engineering firm Sigma Space Corporation offer a new analysis of satellite data that show a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001 in the Antarctic ice sheet."
That gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.
HERE
"In a paper published in the Journal of Glaciology on Friday, researchers from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, the University of Maryland in College Park, and the engineering firm Sigma Space Corporation offer a new analysis of satellite data that show a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001 in the Antarctic ice sheet."
That gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.
HERE
gcthomas
New member
The paper, if you read it, is describing massive climate changes in several areas of Antarctica, some of which somewhat cancel out the ice mass changes in other areas now, but with a trend to not cancelling in the near future. It is strong evidence of climate change.
Why are you misrepresenting it as anti-AGW? The authors are clear that it isn't.
brewmama
New member
Well of course the authors don't say so, because they avoid actual facts like the plague. They want us to be afraid of AGW, despite all the evidence against it.
gcthomas
New member
You should read the paper. There are great big climate changes going on all over Antarctica, as recorded by their instruments. How can you read it and still say climate change isn't happening?
Quetzal
New member
Which evidence is that, exactly?
gcthomas
New member
When even their cherry picked papers actually prove the existence of climate change, there is not likely to be any. I shan't hold my breath.
Quetzal
New member
:chuckle:
brewmama
New member
LOL. Oh the irony. Thinking that the paper "proves" climate change, when what the actual fact is "In a paper published in the Journal of Glaciology on Friday, researchers from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, the University of Maryland in College Park, and the engineering firm Sigma Space Corporation offer a new analysis of satellite data that show a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001 in the Antarctic ice sheet."
When CO2 levels were drastically rising of course, and death of the planet was imminent.
Of course then they put their little spin on it and try to say but, but, but, we know it's coming!!
brewmama
New member
Oh, where to begin! The evidence that although CO2 keeps increasing, satellite measurements show no global warming for over 18 years, the backing off of all their predictions, which are notoriously wrong, the rebuttal of the hockey stick, the unmasking of the obvious agenda and politicization of the climate "industry", the actual decrease in severe weather rather than increase, the quick manufactured covering of bases to explain all the record cold, and on and on.
brewmama
New member
:salute:
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
no :duh:
You don't.
brewmama
New member
Why didn't that post show up for me?
“According to a Coast Guard officer, the icy conditions “are the “worst he’s seen in 20 years“
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/...-warming-put-on-hold-because-of-too-much-ice/