Earlier today someone accused me of sounding like an Acts 2 Dispensationalist. Of course, I denied it emphatically. Acts 2 pertained to the House of Israel as well as, Penticost. The Apostle Paul had yet to enter the picture and the Ascended Christ had not given Paul the Grace Gospel to preach to the Gentiles.
Why this poster made this "accusation" isn't apparent to me? He and I had a falling out of sorts and subsequently I placed him on ignore. Rightfully so, I might add. He became somewhat hostile and said I was acting childish. I see that as being ironic. If you'll look up the word "Dispensation" in the secular and religious meanings you'll find a correlation betwixt the two. Peruse this thread and you'll see the relevance of what I'm saying here.
Absolute self-righteous nonsense, on your part.
The fact is that the only opinion you and some of yours agree with is that which allows you your insolent double standard.
The following still stands - you merely proved it true and then revealed your real self once more when I pointed it.
"Consider that just because one comes to hold to Mid-Acts that alone does not make either remaining Acts 2 Dispy distinctions unawares, and or Acts 2 Dispy distinctions that have crept in unawares, automatically disappear."
All you also did was prove once more what you have often proved - that you still have a long way to go beyond the mere basics of MAD.
Even some of your own within MAD on TOL would publicly have agreed with that in quotes were you not all so into enabling one another in this nonsense of yours that some of you masquerade as standing for the truth...
None of us is the issue. Christ alone is.
When all we do is corect others; never agree with them when they are right; and cannot take open correction; that just proves what hypocrites we are.
It is why you and some of yours have been the joke you have been to so many on TOL over the years - beyond the fact of their opposing view.
Has no one taught you and some of yours even the most basic of the fundamentals of the grace life beyond "that's not for us" exclamation point?
Obviously not.