Interesting claim. Can you prove that every picture of the Earth is a composite? Your claim, you back it up.
The earth is flat and we never went to the moon
- Thread starter DFT_Dave
- Start date
- Status
Interesting claim. Can you prove that every picture of the Earth is a composite? Your claim, you back it up.
I asked a question. I can't find one that's real. Can you?
On Feb. 11, 2015, Elon Musk of SpaceX tweeted this photo, showing the Falcon 9 rocket's second stage carrying the DSCOVR satellite to its parking orbit. The Earth shines in the background:
Fake. :chuckle:On Feb. 11, 2015, Elon Musk of SpaceX tweeted this photo, showing the Falcon 9 rocket's second stage carrying the DSCOVR satellite to its parking orbit. The Earth shines in the background:
Amazing how the UN logo looks like the flat earth model.
The flag of the United Nations contains an example of a polar azimuthal equidistant projection: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azimuthal_equidistant_projection
Seriously, that SpaceX pic is fake.
Yes. If you google Apollo 17 there are some great pictures of the earth taken from the moon. Looks nothing like the flat earth models.
Proof please.
http://flatearthlunacy.com/index.ph...-non-composite-images-of-the-earth-from-space
Scroll down for non-composite photos of earth from space.
For the reasons you have just given is why I said gravity can exist even if not mentioned in the Bible. I have no problem with your argument. But as you say, "imagine all of the matter.." and I I believe that gravity is imagined. But if gravity does exist then I would consider your argument to be correct.
--Dave
Genesis 1:6-7 KJV - [FONT="]And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.[/FONT][FONT="]7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.[/FONT]
The Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion states:
What did the universe look like to the biblical authors? The most common picture is a three-storied cosmos. The earth is a disk floating on an expanse of water, with another expanse of water above it. The sky, or firmament, is an arched structure, a dome, with the celestial bodies fixed in it and with openings through which rain, from the upper watery expanse, falls to earth.
[h=1]Unedited NASA footage of "moon landing" - You still don't believe in a flat earth?[/h]
https://youtu.be/zdFqK1wTx0A
https://youtu.be/zdFqK1wTx0A
View attachment 26128 View attachment 26129
This is where I rollerblade on the Brooklyn side. As you can see there is no curvature of water under the bridge.
The two tall columns were built vertically straight with levels and plumlines at each location. The largest cables were then strung between the two towers. Then the cables hanging from the large cables were put in place before the spans of steal across the bridge.
There was no consideration for the curvature of the earth. That these two very tall columns nearly a mile apart are only 1 5/8 inches more at the top than from the bottom is not nearly what one would expect from an 8 inch drop in curvature from one end the other. No has ever actually measured the distance anyway. The difference is a mere calculation by someone who presupposes a curvature. Even if they there 1 5/8 inch wider at the top they are still "virtually" perpendicular to each other given their height and the distance between them.
--Dave
This is where I rollerblade on the Brooklyn side. As you can see there is no curvature of water under the bridge.
The two tall columns were built vertically straight with levels and plumlines at each location. The largest cables were then strung between the two towers. Then the cables hanging from the large cables were put in place before the spans of steal across the bridge.
There was no consideration for the curvature of the earth. That these two very tall columns nearly a mile apart are only 1 5/8 inches more at the top than from the bottom is not nearly what one would expect from an 8 inch drop in curvature from one end the other. No has ever actually measured the distance anyway. The difference is a mere calculation by someone who presupposes a curvature. Even if they there 1 5/8 inch wider at the top they are still "virtually" perpendicular to each other given their height and the distance between them.
--Dave
No telling how much of the info we have been fed has been faked like that.
[h=1]Rob Skiba proves the Chicago skyline (as seen from the other side) is NOT a mirage[/h]
https://youtu.be/zdFqK1wTx0A
- Status