flintstoned
New member
My Dad was not married, so I am the product of his marriage to my Mom.
I'm not sure I follow....
How was your dad NOT married if you say he was married to your mom?
My Dad was not married, so I am the product of his marriage to my Mom.
My wife will be surprised.Only a homo would say that.
You’ll still have to civilly divorce, but in the eyes of Christians, your marriage is null.
I'm not sure I follow....
How was your dad NOT married if you say he was married to your mom?
Oh.Who cares?
I agree with these words, and there is a need to know precisely how to do this, to carry it out. And it is, to know that believing the Gospel saves, regardless, and that grave sins sever unity between grave sinners and the rest of the Church. Grave sinners who have not reconciled with the rest of the Body of Christ contritely for their grave sin, should not be welcomed to the Lord's Supper until and unless they do. Grave sins do not nullify faith, but grave sins are wounds to Church unity.
1st Corinthians 11:
For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord’s death till he come. 27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. 28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. 29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnationh to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body. 30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.
So 1st Corinthians 11:27-29 KJV is "half cocked rubbish," and "rainbow flags" aren't? You believe that the Church should welcome unrepentant grave sinners into communion?2 Corinthians and Galatians are keys to the misconception made from 1 Corinthians 11.
Paul scathingly rebuked Peter for separating from gentile sinners in Galatians.
In 2 Corinthians 2... especially 2nd Corinthians 2:11, Paul explains he was testing Corinth. He called disfellowship a tool of Satan and explained Forgivness was the standard.
Any other doctrine is half cocked rubbish.
Before my Dad married my Mom he was not married. I am my Mother's firstborn.
Flintstoned said:Jacob said:Sex between a married man and woman is not wrong.
It's wrong if it occurs within a second marriage (If the ex-spouse is still alive, etc).
So what does this factoid have to do with my original reply to your comment:
The grave symbolizes death.
All sins are grave, but we are appointed to die once anyway.
Paul said, "For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord." (Romans 6:23)
1 John 5:16-17 16 If any man see his brother sin a sin which is not unto death, he shall ask, and he shall give him life for them that sin not unto death. There is a sin unto death: I do not say that he shall pray for it. 17 All unrighteousness is sin: and there is a sin not unto death. |
You’ll still have to civilly divorce, but in the eyes of Christians, your marriage is null.
A man and woman who are civilly married to each other, where one or both of them are civilly divorced and their ex is still alive, is adultery. That's what the Lord said. That civil marriage is not valid. Same sex civil marriages are not valid either.What the carnally minded people of this world do is not going to please God whatsoever.
They are after all, carnally minded, not spiritually minded
The Christian who is spiritually minded recognizes that a marriage is s commitment to God and to the spouse.
Marriage is between a believing man and a believing woman.
Believing scripture, not social media, not the trends of this world.
Marriage by design includes the creator of the heaven and earth.
His word tells us what a marriage is
Homosexuality is a sin and sin has no place in marriage.
No sin belongs in any Christians life, but we do err at times, but we need to make sure our lifestyle is according to the word of God.
Sin can be defined as "missing the mark." The mark which is set, arguably, by God. I would define sin as "manipulating and deliberately hurting another person." For me then a sinful act is one which deliberately sets out to harm others. Mere homosexual sex is no more inherently sinful than mere heterosexual sex.
Strawman. I didn't make that argument. However, humor me. If a man wants to marry his son, should that be against secular law or should that be legal?As for the canard that sex is solely for procreation, that is why we prevent infertile people and the elderly from marriage because they cannot have children .... Oh! wait, we don't.
Isn't it wonderful that you teach the lost that God was mistaken in assigning the harshest punishment for the sin of homosexual acts?I am not bound in my understanding by the words and worldviews of folk two millenia ago. My job, here and now, is to follow my Lord who fellowshipped with all kinds of undesirable folk.
Show me one word from Christ about homosexuality. Moreover show me one reason I should accept that the Levites of 4k years ago know more about homosexuality than we do today.Isn't it wonderful that you teach the lost that God was mistaken in assigning the harshest punishment for the sin of homosexual acts?
By accepting your teachings they can stay lost!
I am not bound in my understanding by the words and worldviews of folk two millenia ago. My job, here and now, is to follow my Lord who fellowshipped with all kinds of undesirable folk.
So you might as well not believe in any of the Bible then or Christ Jesus? As Jesus himself also preached two millennia ago as did his apostles, one of which was Paul who filled with the Holy Spirit taught it was wrong to commit gay acts!
Yes, Jesus did mix with everyone, whatever their sin, but he also taught them to turn from sin, and gay relationships are a sin. But only God knows the hearts of others, but we are to speak the truth and leave God to do the judging.
Show me one word from Christ about homosexuality. Moreover show me one reason I should accept that the Levites of 4k years ago know more about homosexuality than we do today.
Tihei Mauri ora