What service does it provide?
entertainment
listening to like minded people
who
know how to state an argument
confirming your less than honorable beliefs
like you
I am not happy with them
but
let's talk about it
and
then vote
What service does it provide?
entertainment
listening to like minded people
who
know how to state an argument
confirming your less than honorable beliefs
like you
I am not happy with them
but
let's talk about it
and
then vote
I remember when I became disillusioned, it was when Hugh Hewitt pushed Schwarzenegger over McClintock, and all the talking heads pushing Romney or McCain over Duncan Hunter. I remember clearly the day I stopped listening altogether, and it was when a certain talk show host out-and-out lied, and I knew he was lying. I was driving at the time and I remember smacking the steering wheel and saying "that's a lie, that's completely untrue..." and I turned talk radio off that day and never went back. They're hucksters and and puffed egos who love to hear themselves talk.
...If he was murdered, the hit man was an amateur (leaving a pillow over his head).
Chrys doesn't care that they lie. As long as their lies serve his agenda, he calls it 'entertainment'.I remember when I became disillusioned, it was when Hugh Hewitt pushed Schwarzenegger over McClintock, and all the talking heads pushed Romney or McCain over Duncan Hunter. I remember clearly the day I stopped listening altogether, and it was when a certain talk show host out-and-out lied, and I knew he was lying. I was driving at the time and I remember smacking the steering wheel and saying "that's a lie, that's completely untrue..." and I turned talk radio off that day and never went back. They're hucksters and puffed egos who love to hear themselves talk.
The most sensible post from you to date. Good job!Conservative talk radio isn't about conservatism, it's about money.
You are, what is commonly known as a rightwing hack.entertainment
listening to like minded people
who
know how to state an argument
confirming your less than honorable beliefs
like you
I am not happy with them
but
let's talk about it
and
then vote
Name names. Who was the talking head? WHO?I remember when I became disillusioned, it was when Hugh Hewitt pushed Schwarzenegger over McClintock, and all the talking heads pushed Romney or McCain over Duncan Hunter. I remember clearly the day I stopped listening altogether, and it was when a certain talk show host out-and-out lied, and I knew he was lying. I was driving at the time and I remember smacking the steering wheel and saying "that's a lie, that's completely untrue..." and I turned talk radio off that day and never went back. They're hucksters and puffed egos who love to hear themselves talk.
Chrys doesn't care that they lie. As long as their lies serve his agenda, he calls it 'entertainment'.
acw is just like all the other idiots who listen to talk radio
they will not vote
if
they don't get cruz
and
allow another democrat to appoint another liberal to the court
and
then wonder why we are going in the wrong direction
grow up
start thinking for yourself
stop being led by talk radio
Good points.
He also said it's purpose is to make money by "entertaining people". When that's not what it's doing. It's purpose is to make as much money as possible for its capital investors, and it does that by selling advertisement time to whomever will pay them for it. The more people they can get to tune in, the more money they can demand for their ad-time.Did you even read his posts? He says he doesn't like talk radio.
Conservative talk radio isn't about conservatism, it's about money.
Bingo!
Michael Smirconish is very interesting to listen to on this topic. He was a talk show host back in the day (still is), and he sometimes talks about how he was pressured to essentially go the same direction as Rush in bombastically stirring up the Right-wing, which apparently had an infinite pool of rage waiting to be tapped.
He wrote a novel, which is a fictionalize account of his experience (which I haven't read, I've just heard him talk about it).
http://www.amazon.com/Talk-Novel-Michael-Smerconish/dp/1604334908
Nope, he was not. The Bible is quite silent on abortion for the simple reason that a foetus is not considered a child until one month post birth (for boy children, longer for girls.) Only then were they numbered among the "children of Israel. "
Surely conspiracy theorists will say Obama had something to do with this... Naz? :think:
He also said it's purpose is to make money by "entertaining people". When that's not what it's doing. It's purpose is to make as much money as possible for its capital investors, and it does that by selling advertisement time to whomever will pay them for it. The more people they can get to tune in, the more money they can demand for their ad-time.
But the right wing-nut media has learned that it can attract more viewers by telling them whatever lies they want to hear, and want to believe, and by generating lots of fear, then creating scapegoats for people to hate and blame it all on, than it can by just "entertaining" them with unbelievable stories. It's not "entertainment", anymore, it's propaganda. It's lying, fear-mongering, and scape-goating, for the purpose of selling ad time to whomever will pay them as much as they can get. People like Rupert Murdock used to sell "entertainment" in the form of bizarre phony news stories about Elvis being abducted by space aliens. But he eventually figured out that he could make even more money peddling lies that pretend to be the truth, and stir up people's fear, and bigotry, and blame, and loathing.
The republican party has learned that it can use these same rightwing audiences to win elections by doing the exact same things: telling them the lies that validate their ignorance and bigotry, by stirring up their fears, and by providing them scapegoats to hate and blame everything on. And of course those scapegoats are the republican's opponents: the democrats. So the republicans and the right wing-nut media have created a kind of "unholy alliance" in which they, together, promote the same lies, fears, and scape-goats to the same eager audience, each for their own ends.
And that makes you think he doesn't care about lies if it serves his agenda. Gotcha. lain:He also said it's purpose is to make money by "entertaining people".
Yes it's an unfortunate thing.When that's not what it's doing. It's purpose is to make as much money as possible for its capital investors, and it does that by selling advertisement time to whomever will pay them for it. The more people they can get to tune in, the more money they can demand for their ad-time.
But the right wing-nut media has learned that it can attract more viewers by telling them whatever lies they want to hear, and want to believe, and by generating lots of fear, then creating scapegoats for people to hate and blame it all on, than it can by just "entertaining" them with unbelievable stories. It's not "entertainment", anymore, it's propaganda. It's lying, fear-mongering, and scape-goating, for the purpose of selling ad time to whomever will pay them as much as they can get. People like Rupert Murdock used to sell "entertainment" in the form of bizarre phony news stories about Elvis being abducted by space aliens. But he eventually figured out that he could make even more money peddling lies that pretend to be the truth, and stir up people's fear, and bigotry, and blame, and loathing.
The republican party has learned that it can use these same rightwing audiences to win elections by doing the exact same things: telling them the lies that validate their ignorance and bigotry, by stirring up their fears, and by providing them scapegoats to hate and blame everything on. And of course those scapegoats are the republican's opponents: the democrats. So the republicans and the right wing-nut media have created a kind of "unholy alliance" in which they, together, promote the same lies, fears, and scape-goats to the same eager audience, each for their own ends.
Thanks, I took a look at your link. I don't know much about Smirconish beyond name recognition, never listened to him, but I see from the reviews that he's a former conservative, now moderate? Is that still accurate?
It makes me wonder how many people have swung moderate or changed affiliation from Republican to Independent in recent years. I'm not the only person I know who's traveled a similar road.
You have to admit that it must be getting difficult to keep drinking that right-wing kool-aid these days when the republican party has sunk to levels of absurdity, stupidity, and pointless mean-spiritedness that no American alive has ever seen, before. A few days on TOL is proof enough that people can and do convince themselves of ANYTHING, no matter how absurd and idiotic, but when they have to keep doing it over and over and over, I think it wears down even the chronic self-decievers.I suspect his journey may have been similar to yours (and mine, for that matter), although he got a very direct, relatively early peek behind the curtain, which seemed like it kinda soured him on the whole thing.