Alive is something you are a stranger to.
Wit is something that, stays far from you!
Alive is something you are a stranger to.
I agree, as long as you are not claiming that paying for various levels of participation here is "aiding and abetting".
Is this your claim?
AMR
Wit is something that, stays far from you!
The target of humour seldom see's the funny side...it's to painful.
Your rather 'boorish behavior' portrays you as totally, incorrigible!
I believe you to be an 'anti-social' type of individual, who tries
to find some modicum of relevance on this esteemed forum!
However, you continue to fall short of expectation! Why? The
answer is very simple (like your mind) you lack the kind of
'people skills' necessary, in order to maintain a positive
presence on this or any other 'social gathering!'
I feel nothing but empathy, for your condition! You're simply
not, a nice fellow! You need help!
It is prostitution for Knight to take money from a JW, who is nothing but an enemy against the gospel truths of Triune God.
Standing for the Truths of God is more important than TOL existing for another year.
Nang
:thumb:What can I do??? God predestined an millennia ago that I "prostitute" TOL to JWs.
If I were you.... I would ask God why He did that.
I'm pretty sure he was pointing out her hypocrisy, not condemning judging in general.:rotfl: you and nang and meshak all 3 have a lot of room to be talking about judging people.
What about a God who knows the future doesn't exist and thus cannot be quantified, because nothingness cannot be.I believe that a god who is not all-knowing with regards to the future is a false god.
And yet you accept Calvinism wholly. What does that make you?God has a reason. I just don't know what it is..,
Truster, I could resort to calling you an 'imbecile' but, I shall refrain
from such 'low brow behavior!' Instead, I will simply accuse you of,
being "Intellectually Challenged!" I hope that's acceptable and
respectful enough so as, not to offend your, 'considerable' sensitivities'?
Your posts are beginning to look like those of Lets Argue. More punctuation marks than absolutely necessary either dilutes the message or shows the attitude of the author. It being impossible to dilute your messages any further it must therefore be the latter....GM king of the tantrums.
:thumb:
I'm pretty sure he was pointing out her hypocrisy, not condemning judging in general.
What about a God who knows the future doesn't exist and thus cannot be quantified, because nothingness cannot be.
You are arguing that God knows all the ins and outs of the little red ball in my hand when there is no ball in my hand.
And yet you accept Calvinism wholly. What does that make you?
thats the problem, you don't believe in prophecy. A future that has not yet happened. Any idiot knows night follows day. It's the law. Calvinists knows the laws well in advance.
I do not disagree with any of the scriptures above, but I disagree that these promises were not made to God's people through out time. The first time the gospel promise was made, was to Eve in the garden, when a Savior was first promised to rectify the wickedness of the devil. Genesis 3:15
I study Covenant Theology, and it reveals these promises made openly to men of God from Seth to Noah; from Abraham to Moses; to David and all the prophets, John the Baptist, Mary, etc.
The gospel was only kept a mystery to those who would perish, according to the determination of God.
Dispensationalism is doing you no favors, heir. . .
Dispensationalism is an awful theolgy
Thanks for your opinion, which means nothing. Reason from scripture.Dispensationalism is an awful theolgy
Thanks for your opinion, which means nothing. Reason from scripture.
Thanks for your opinion, which means nothing. Reason from scripture.