I don't actually agree with Nang's thesis in this thread. I don't think its wrong to take money from unbelievers, including Jehovah's Witnesses or other non-trinitarians. I also don't think any viewpoints should be banned from this website. We should call unbelievers out on their blasphemy, not censor them as if we were afraid.
Also, I do think its somewhat ironic that Nang is calling on open theists to ban non-trinitarians for their theological views, seeing as the former isn't really much better than the latter. I haven't discussed this with Nang though, so I don't know her reasoning. I could be off track here. But I'm not sure why Nang would expect heretics to censor other heretics, or if there would be a point to that even if there was.
Mind you, there's a place for exclusively Christian dialogue, I don't think that place is on a forum like this one or especially on a forum that is run by heretics.
And... there's probably no way I can say this without getting in trouble myself, so I'll just say, look, I know my assertion that the admins are heretics is a harsh one. I believe that a god who is not all-knowing with regards to the future is a false god. I would not be surprised if open theists felt the same way about the God I worship (especially since I believe God predestines all that occurs, even sin.) I could defend these views in another thread. I won't defend them in this one. Suffice for me to say that I THINK Nang would agree with everything in those last couple paragraphs.
Again, I don't agree with Nang on everything. That doesn't mean I'm going to throw her under the bus. She's a good Christian woman who understands the gospel. That's FAR more than I can say about most here.