If the woman watched it, it's her fault.
If a man watched it, it's her fault.
Crucible told me so it's true
:chuckle:
If the woman watched it, it's her fault.
If a man watched it, it's her fault.
Crucible told me so it's true
There is not one example on TOL in all of your years of posting where you have ever stated "he was wrong".
The nonsense you are identifying is ... your own. Neither partner (the wife OR the husband) have a valid excuse for cheating or violence.
Or perhaps he is just a pervert ...
Using your standard, if a wife cheats or watches pornography, *he* is not doing his part AS A HUSBAND.
This seems to me a very important point.dopamine
And with billions of lonely people, porn is big business.Porn is stupid. Lonely persons watch it because they lack intimacy.
And with billions of lonely people, porn is big business.
:chuckle:There is no really good reason to be lonely. Go out and make yourself available.
There is no really good reason to be lonely. Go out and make yourself available.
What an odd logic:
Watching porn is mortally sinful
But
It's totally cool to have sex with multiple women until one marries you
:freak:
You don't have to be lonely and you don't have to have sex not to be lonely.
Habakkuk 2:15 is the closest thing to Sacred Scripture addressing the matter directly IMO. The passage seems to assume that nobody would ever voluntarily permit their neighbors to look upon them while undressed.While the Bible is silent on porn, our Magisterium is not:Text 2354 Pornography consists in removing real or simulated sexual acts from the intimacy of the partners, in order to display them deliberately to third parties. It offends against chastity because it perverts the conjugal act, the intimate giving of spouses to each other. It does grave injury to the dignity of its participants (actors, vendors, the public), since each one becomes an object of base pleasure and illicit profit for others. It immerses all who are involved in the illusion of a fantasy world. It is a grave offense. Civil authorities should prevent the production and distribution of pornographic materials.
1st World society hinges on a 'mini-marriage' construct where you have sex with a potential partner.
That's because you all consistently put blame on men all the time. Never fails.
Even when there is a concern for men, it's always only halfway- a cheap, watered down compassion that doesn't dump accountability on women's heads much like how it's always done with men.
Perfect example, right here- state a moral but don't actually acknowledge the complexity of causes or mitigation for a man doing something wrong.
With women, you'd all sit there all day and you have, especially when it comes to so called sexual harassment and violence.
A sexually frustrated man is not a 'pervert'. This is another perfect example- no compassion, at all. You may as well assign Satan as prosecutor.
Cheating and watching pornography are not the same thing, which is why the man may opt to do the lesser of the two because it's not that he wants to cheat on his wife, but his wife is also not being a wife.
Any woman who gets bent out of shape to the extent that this woman I spoke of did, they are excessively haughty and selfish, plain and simple.
Wrong ... though you consistently fabricate stories and intentionally misrepresent others.
:yawn: Cool story ... perhaps someday you will grow up and meet reality.
Gender has nothing to do with whether or not sexual harassment and domestic violence is wrong. Why is it so hard for you to state "Men AND women need to keep their hands to themselves!"? Outside of protecting a child, there is not one good reason for either spouse to hit one another.
A sexually frustrated man is no different than a sexually frustrated woman. If either of them are cheating, they are adulterous slimebags. IF they are watching porn, aka other men and women having sex, they are a perverts.
OR he could just be an adulterous slimebag ... and pervert.
:yawn: Cool story ...
Exhibit A:
Where I state something and the person opposing it outright exhibits what they oppose.
Irony lain:
It's amusing as well as telling that you were incapable of responding to my post with anything other than "you oppose what I said ... I am right, you are wrong!".
The one thing that never changes about you ... is the fact that you are always predictable.
You're just repeating the same drivel, which I called you on. You pretty much affirmed what I stated :idunno:
At least I'm consistent.
Oh ... here I was talking about reality as compared to your deluded, make-believe fantasy world. My bad.
Consistently hypocritical, misogynistic, out of touch with reality and flat out wrong.
Yep, you are consistent. :chuckle: