Quetzal
New member
How about the foreign notion (to you) that the rapist is responsible?In my opinion, the father bears some responsibility for the kidnapping and rape
How about the foreign notion (to you) that the rapist is responsible?In my opinion, the father bears some responsibility for the kidnapping and rape
How about the foreign notion (to you) that the rapist is responsible?
You have said many other things to get people to respond to your idiotic theories but you still miss the primary point that the rapist the individual responsible. Period. No ifs, ands, or buts. I cannot comprehend why you think differently.i've never said otherwise :idunno:
nope - they don't get get nearly as much attention as male on female rape
neither does male on male rape
even when the law didn't call for it, fathers and brothers used to take it on themselves to implement
rape my sister - expect at the very least a severe beating, perhaps a castration, or maybe you'll just disappear
:thumb:
all crime - if i go down to the ghetto, get drunk, wave a fistful of hundreds around while shouting racial slurs and pass out, why shouldn't i bear some responsibility for the inevitable beating and robbery that occurs?
and the seductress is guilty of the lesser sin?
now be fair - this is zoo you're talking about :chuckle:
:thumb:
rape is wrong because it is a perversion of the natural purpose of sex, which God gave us, which is procreation, in a marriage
actually, i was thinking about a couple of specific cases when i made my "provocative" statement in the other thread - one of them was the amish girls case (which happened just down the road from me)
as I have said, i don't blame children for situations that they may find themselves in (unless they're being disobedient).
In this case, the Amish father allowed them to be out of sight, with the expectation that they would be interacting with the wicked world that the Amish deliberately separate themselves from.
In my opinion, the father bears some responsibility for the kidnapping and rape
You have said many other things to get people to respond to your idiotic theories but you still miss the primary point that the rapist the individual responsible. Period. No ifs, ands, or buts. I cannot comprehend why you think differently.
Is the pedophile's cruelty more severe when he rapes a 10 year old child, 5 year old, 9 month old?
Of course the seductress is the lessor sin.
not sure a 9 month old would have lasting repercussions, absent physical damage
the emotional trauma for a 10 year old or a five year old would be severe
but a sin all the same
Have you ever seen the lacerated vagina of a child who has been raped by an adult male?
yes, i have, which is why i qualified it with "absent physical damage"
Are you aware of what effect trauma has on the brain? Regardless of age.not sure a 9 month old would have lasting repercussions, absent physical damage
not sure a 9 month old would have lasting repercussions, absent physical damage
the emotional trauma for a 10 year old or a five year old would be severe
but a sin all the same
That should be the end of your discussion but you just can't help yourself, can you?the rapist is responsible for his actions, yes
I cannot comprehend why you think differently.
Yes I agree lust is a selfish animalistic desire, which takes no time at all to confirm on the internet if you are so inclined, not that I have ever tried you understand. :nono:I'm not thinking you fully understand what "lust" is, it is selfish desire.
A married man and woman belong to one another.
My comment was for self glory gazer
the rapist is responsible for his actions, yes
i've never suggested otherwise
and the victim (whether woman, man or guardian of a child) is responsible for their actions that may have allowed the situation to develop
consider the following: a father allows his children to be babysat by a known pedophile. The children are molested. Of course the pedophile is responsible for his actions.
but do you not see that the father is also culpable for putting the children in a risky situation?
not sure why we're going in this direction
rape is bad
That should be the end of your discussion but you just can't help yourself, can you?
That should be the end of your discussion but you just can't help yourself, can you?
... without lust humanity just wouldn't be here.
The fact that you have to pull such an extreme, specific example to make your point highlights just has pathetic it is. I have already fed this troll too much, no more. :wave2:a father allows his children to be babysat by a known pedophile.
The children are molested.
is the pedophile responsible for his actions?
of course
does the father bear any responsibility for putting the children at risk?