If Rusha ran, I would seriously consider voting for her based on her anti-abortion stance alone.
I know people that vote strictly Republican just because they are Pro-Life
If Rusha ran, I would seriously consider voting for her based on her anti-abortion stance alone.
Nahhh. You are just describing the person, right?
I know people that vote strictly Republican just because they are Pro-Life
who would be
that
much of an idiot?
Good lookin fish. :thumb:nobody commented on my fish
I stopped voting Republican when I realized that they only claimed to be Pro-Life, but acted like Pro-Abortionists when it came to making laws and voting.I know people that vote strictly Republican just because they are Pro-Life
The Republicans must have thought so because they attempted to impeach Clinton!Did any of those "indiscretions" impact their leadership? I believe that was the issue.
The Republicans must have thought so because they attempted to impeach Clinton!
Livingston was forced to resign as GOP House Speaker.
That was when Republicans were making the moral distinction that somehow they had the monopoly on "family values."Indeed ... a bit of hypocrisy on their part.
That was when Republicans were making the moral distinction that somehow they had the monopoly on "family values."
Now that they smell a possible winner in Donald Trump, conservatives can no longer claim that he embodies ""family values," while the former "birthers" who've been questioning Obama's nation of birth for the past 7 years have been silent now that one of their own, Ted Cruz, is a presidential candidate.
The Republicans must have thought so because they attempted to impeach Clinton!
Livingston was forced to resign as GOP House Speaker.