glorydaz
Well-known member
I guess it's better to have them LIE through their teeth on a regular basis and to our faces than it is to demonstrate a bit of mockery....which is at least honest.
On "Cripples"
- Thread starter ok doser
- Start date
I guess it's better to have them LIE through their teeth on a regular basis and to our faces than it is to demonstrate a bit of mockery....which is at least honest.
shagster01
New member
According to nothing.
So are millions of other people.
So what :idunno:
Leadership is not based on
a)marriage
b)not being a fan of Jezebel's baby killers
c)your dumb, unfounded, typical liberal opinion
People focus on all the things that don't matter, and wonder why we end up with inept leadership
Does this mean that now that the "brilliant" Donald Trump is beginning to look like the Republican presidential nominee conservatives have been forced to abandon their position on "family values?"
Conservatives can take consolation in the fact that at least Vladimir Putan's "family" endorses
"the Donald!"
I'm trying to think when a President's affairs or personal sins ever had an impact on their leadership and you know what?
I can't think of a damn thing.
Good job picking leadership on criteria that has nothing to do with leadership. Please do us a favor and not vote :thumb:
I can't think of a damn thing.
Good job picking leadership on criteria that has nothing to do with leadership. Please do us a favor and not vote :thumb:
glorydaz
Well-known member
And Rusha is pro-idiots.
glorydaz
Well-known member
Well, there was that JFK/Marilyn Monroe thing. Didn't that keep him from handling the Cuban Missile Crisis? :think:
Maybe not.
Clinton nearly got impeached over that blue dress thing....but now his wife is being considered for the Oval Office.
But, that Donald is rumored to be "pro-adultery" so surely that means something.
Except when a Democratic President Clinton had a tryst with Monica Lewinsky, the Republicans threw up their hands in self-righteous indignation - and then tried to have him impeached by the House on December 19, 1998 and then by the Senate on February 12, 1999!
During the investigation, it was also revealed GOP House Speaker-designate Representative Bob Livingston, Republican Dan Burton of Indiana, Republican Helen Chenoweth of Idaho and Republican Henry Hyde of Illinois were all involved in marital infidelities.
Last edited:
glorydaz
Well-known member
Did any of those "indiscretions" impact their leadership? I believe that was the issue.
shagster01
New member
You don't feel having a first lady with her nude photos all over the Internet (she posed for them, they weren't stolen) has an impact on leadership?
That surprises me from the Christian right?
Perhaps I should.
You are a much better choice than Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, or Bernie Sanders. So there is that....
genuineoriginal
New member
If Rusha ran, I would seriously consider voting for her based on her anti-abortion stance alone.
:darwinsm: LOL, you must really hate them.
ClimateSanity
New member
He said mean things to Megan Kelly and Rosie O'Donnell. This means he hates women and so it is possible he committed adultery. SarcWell, there was that JFK/Marilyn Monroe thing. Didn't that keep him from handling the Cuban Missile Crisis? :think:
Maybe not.
Clinton nearly got impeached over that blue dress thing....but now his wife is being considered for the Oval Office.
But, that Donald is rumored to be "pro-adultery" so surely that means something.
Oh, is that the argument you are going with, Dolo?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ex-wife-Marla-Maples-confesses-loves-him.html
From the article:
Poor Donald. She MADE him do it. :think:
Enthusiast
New member
Nahhh. You are just describing the person, right?Trump's lighting up the e-verse with his gaffe of "mocking a crippled reporter"
Gotta dig into this a bit, but my first thought was:
Is it politically correct to refer to the handicapped as "cripples"?
