heir
TOL Subscriber
All men are forgiven, but not saved. To be saved (and sealed) one trusts the Lord after hearing and believing the word of truth (1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV. Ephesians 1:13 KJV).
ECT Nang's Boastful Lie
- Thread starter Doom
- Start date
heir
TOL Subscriber
so he says, but what saith the scripture: 2 Timothy 3:16-17 KJV
Nang
TOL Subscriber
God's Law/Word defines righteousness.
All men fall short of that definition. That is what condemns them.
The Law/Word of God IS God. . . the Logos that Incarnated to fulfill all the Law/Word of God, for His spiritual offspring.
God cannot be against God.
God cannot be against His own moral standards of holiness.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
but "saith" doesn't even mean what you think it means
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
There is no inadequacy of the Bible whatsoever. That doesn't mean the English language is adequate for word-to-word translation of scripture.
Others ask me all the time if they need to learn Greek or Hebrew, and I always tell them the same thing. NO. Just learn what the words mean in your own language.
The inadequacy is of our culture and language, with entitlement that God's depth of inspired meaning is inherently represented by the English language.
Greek doesn't even have an indefinite article for nouns. That means every anarthrous noun doesn't have an equivalent in English. That's not the inadequacy of God and His word, it's the inadequacy of language that is used by Satan to put his devices in the minds of men, including reading scripture.
God shouldn't get the blame for Satan's usage of the confusion God sent at Babel.
Doom
New member
Nope. God is righteous, and He is not defined by Law. If He was, Law would be greater.
God is not Holy because He maintains submission to Law.
You are a mess. The Law is your god. You worship Moses, just like the Pharisees.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
You twist and twist.
heir
TOL Subscriber
If we can't believe the words mean what they say we are all in big trouble. Thankfully, we can Psalms 12:6-7 KJV
Who's Donna?
Nang
TOL Subscriber
That is pure blasphemy and makes faith out to be a human work.
Such statements trample the Son of God underfoot; counts the blood of the covenant a common thing; and insults the Holy Spirit of grace.
heir
TOL Subscriber
I've no need to twist or consult languages I don't even know how to read, speak or write. I have all scripture.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
It's not my opinion. It's the lexical meanings from Erasmus' text in Greek. The foundation for your KJV.
"Your" KJB agrees with me, not you. You don't know what it's translated from. The recipient language doesn't determine the meaning of the donor language.
You're needlessly and ignorantly obtuse. Indoctrinated.
It's you who is doing, "The Twist!"
heir
TOL Subscriber
Nope! It's the good news! You don't have any!
heir
TOL Subscriber
:kiss:
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
You do it constantly. It's called English. English is a language, and you're demanding that English determines the meaning for the Greek (and Hebrew) inspired text.
The very foundation for your KJV is Greek. You twist and consult a language alright. English. You use it to destroy the actual meaning of the text that gave you the KJV.
Obviously.
No, you have a lanugage that you've used to define scripture yourself.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
He's Greeking you!
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Have you considered publishing your own version in English?