It will show that he gets his beliefs from men just like he accuses us of. What's the difference whether it's Darby or doctor feel-good and Mr syrupy and other distinguished figures of churchianity?
Yes, this punk's MO on TOL, is sophistry, and hypocrisy, as he wines, and cries, and pines, about how MAD is wrong, because it is "invented," by "men," and accuses others of "following the false teachings/inventions of men." The punk knows that it is a deceitful "argument," as all false doctrine, by definition, are "inventions" of men," come from men. That does NADA for his, or any other's doctrine, re. its veracity, or lack thereof-as if he is taught directly by God?
Additionally, the scripture directs us to follow the teachings of faithful men; but this punk:
-in deceit, does away with the God ordained teaching ministry of certain men, within the boc, as outlined by Paul
-in hypocrisy spews forth this sophistry, as he has admitted that he learns/is taught by other men
And finally, the greasy punk asserts that when you discover objective truth, determines if it is, in effect, objective truth, and thus asserts, by this satanic "argument," he employs, over and over again, on TOL, against the dispensational approach to interpreting/understanding the book, that "The Reformation" of the 1500's is false, the earth was flat at one time, "God the Father" was not "God the Father" until He was revealed as such, by the Lord Jesus Christ, and the Lord Jesus Christ was not the Lord Jesus Christ, until He was revealed as such to "whomever." This is one of the "arguments" Roman Catholics employ, in deceit, against "Protestanism. Of course, Tellalie has admitted that he is a closet Catholic.
